A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma
Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1990 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
in: Diseases of the colon & rectum - 1990, 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:33 ; year:1990 ; month:04 ; pages:285-290 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ207499829 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ207499829 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506115001.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 070528s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ207499829 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1990 | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. | ||
| 533 | |f Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Shank, Brenda |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dershaw, D. David |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Caravelli, James |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barth, Jay |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Enker, Warren |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i in |t Diseases of the colon & rectum |d 1990 |g 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 |w (DE-627)NLEJ188993568 |w (DE-600)2046914-7 |x 1530-0358 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:1990 |g month:04 |g pages:285-290 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-SOJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 1990 |c 4 |h 285-290 |g 6 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:15300358:1990----::popcietdotecuayfroeaieoptdoorpisaigfains |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1990 |
| publishDate |
1990 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ207499829 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma 1990 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Shank, Brenda oth Dershaw, D. David oth Caravelli, James oth Barth, Jay oth Enker, Warren oth in Diseases of the colon & rectum 1990 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 (DE-627)NLEJ188993568 (DE-600)2046914-7 1530-0358 nnns volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 33 1990 4 285-290 6 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ207499829 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma 1990 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Shank, Brenda oth Dershaw, D. David oth Caravelli, James oth Barth, Jay oth Enker, Warren oth in Diseases of the colon & rectum 1990 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 (DE-627)NLEJ188993568 (DE-600)2046914-7 1530-0358 nnns volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 33 1990 4 285-290 6 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ207499829 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma 1990 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Shank, Brenda oth Dershaw, D. David oth Caravelli, James oth Barth, Jay oth Enker, Warren oth in Diseases of the colon & rectum 1990 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 (DE-627)NLEJ188993568 (DE-600)2046914-7 1530-0358 nnns volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 33 1990 4 285-290 6 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ207499829 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma 1990 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Shank, Brenda oth Dershaw, D. David oth Caravelli, James oth Barth, Jay oth Enker, Warren oth in Diseases of the colon & rectum 1990 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 (DE-627)NLEJ188993568 (DE-600)2046914-7 1530-0358 nnns volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 33 1990 4 285-290 6 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ207499829 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma 1990 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 Shank, Brenda oth Dershaw, D. David oth Caravelli, James oth Barth, Jay oth Enker, Warren oth in Diseases of the colon & rectum 1990 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 (DE-627)NLEJ188993568 (DE-600)2046914-7 1530-0358 nnns volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 33 1990 4 285-290 6 |
| language |
English |
| source |
in Diseases of the colon & rectum 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
in Diseases of the colon & rectum 33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290 volume:33 year:1990 month:04 pages:285-290 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shank, Brenda @@oth@@ Dershaw, D. David @@oth@@ Caravelli, James @@oth@@ Barth, Jay @@oth@@ Enker, Warren @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1990-04-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ188993568 |
| id |
NLEJ207499829 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ207499829</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506115001.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070528s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ207499829</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shank, Brenda</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dershaw, D. David</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caravelli, James</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Barth, Jay</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enker, Warren</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Diseases of the colon & rectum</subfield><subfield code="d">1990</subfield><subfield code="g">33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188993568</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2046914-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1530-0358</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1990</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:285-290</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">1990</subfield><subfield code="c">4</subfield><subfield code="h">285-290</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ188993568 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1530-0358 |
| topic_title |
A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
b s bs d d d dd ddd j c jc j b jb w e we |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ188993568 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ188993568 (DE-600)2046914-7 |
| title |
A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| spellingShingle |
A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ207499829 |
| title_full |
A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| journal |
Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| journalStr |
Diseases of the colon & rectum |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1990 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
285 |
| container_volume |
33 |
| physical |
6 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| title_sort |
a prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| title_auth |
A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| abstract |
Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-SOJ GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| title_short |
A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Shank, Brenda Dershaw, D. David Caravelli, James Barth, Jay Enker, Warren |
| author2Str |
Shank, Brenda Dershaw, D. David Caravelli, James Barth, Jay Enker, Warren |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ188993568 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T09:50:50.062Z |
| _version_ |
1803822773108211712 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ207499829</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506115001.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070528s1990 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ207499829</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A prospective study of the accuracy of preoperative computed tomographic staging of patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract From June 1983 to January 1986, 91 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum had computed tomographic scans of the pelvis performed before treatment as part of a “sandwich” radiotherapy-surgery regimen. Two experienced diagnostic radiologists performed locoregional staging of all scans according to the University of California at San Francisco criteria; one of these radiologists repeated this staging at a later time to test the reproducibility of a single observer. Staging was performed without the use of any other radiographic studies or of any clinical information except the patients' age, sex, and the diagnosis of rectal carcinoma, to test the value of computed tomographic scans alone for staging. Agreement between the two stagings performed by the first observer was 51 percent, and interobserver agreement was only 37 percent. Agreement with Dukes' staging was only 33 percent. Therefore, preoperative pelvic computed tomographic scanning of primary rectal adenocarcinoma should not be relied upon for staging or for the selection of patients for treatment options.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shank, Brenda</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dershaw, D. David</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caravelli, James</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Barth, Jay</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enker, Warren</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">in</subfield><subfield code="t">Diseases of the colon & rectum</subfield><subfield code="d">1990</subfield><subfield code="g">33(1990) vom: Apr., Seite 285-290</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ188993568</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2046914-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1530-0358</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1990</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:285-290</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02055469</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-SOJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">1990</subfield><subfield code="c">4</subfield><subfield code="h">285-290</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4003143 |