China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism
This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Killion, M. Ulric [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
The Berkeley Electronic Press ; 2003 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Global jurist / Frontiers - Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001, 3.2003, 2, art3 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2003 ; number:2 ; pages:3 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ219553726 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ219553726 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707085657.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090716s2003 xxu|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ219553726 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XD-US | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Killion, M. Ulric |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |
| 264 | 1 | |b The Berkeley Electronic Press |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. | ||
| 533 | |f Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a China | |
| 650 | 4 | |a constitutionalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a neo-liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a liberalism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Global jurist / Frontiers |d Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001 |g 3.2003, 2, art3 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ219537259 |w (DE-600)2115503-3 |x 1535-1653 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2003 |g number:2 |g pages:3 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-BEP | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 2003 |e 2 |h 3 |y 3.2003, 2, art3 | ||
| author_variant |
m u k mu muk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:15351653:2003----::hnadelbrlosi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2003 |
| publishDate |
2003 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)NLEJ219553726 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XD-US Killion, M. Ulric verfasserin aut China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism The Berkeley Electronic Press 2003 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism In Global jurist / Frontiers Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001 3.2003, 2, art3 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219537259 (DE-600)2115503-3 1535-1653 nnns volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-BEP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2003 2 3 3.2003, 2, art3 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)NLEJ219553726 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XD-US Killion, M. Ulric verfasserin aut China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism The Berkeley Electronic Press 2003 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism In Global jurist / Frontiers Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001 3.2003, 2, art3 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219537259 (DE-600)2115503-3 1535-1653 nnns volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-BEP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2003 2 3 3.2003, 2, art3 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)NLEJ219553726 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XD-US Killion, M. Ulric verfasserin aut China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism The Berkeley Electronic Press 2003 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism In Global jurist / Frontiers Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001 3.2003, 2, art3 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219537259 (DE-600)2115503-3 1535-1653 nnns volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-BEP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2003 2 3 3.2003, 2, art3 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)NLEJ219553726 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XD-US Killion, M. Ulric verfasserin aut China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism The Berkeley Electronic Press 2003 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism In Global jurist / Frontiers Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001 3.2003, 2, art3 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219537259 (DE-600)2115503-3 1535-1653 nnns volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-BEP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2003 2 3 3.2003, 2, art3 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)NLEJ219553726 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XD-US Killion, M. Ulric verfasserin aut China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism The Berkeley Electronic Press 2003 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism In Global jurist / Frontiers Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001 3.2003, 2, art3 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219537259 (DE-600)2115503-3 1535-1653 nnns volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-BEP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2003 2 3 3.2003, 2, art3 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Global jurist / Frontiers 3.2003, 2, art3 volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 |
| sourceStr |
In Global jurist / Frontiers 3.2003, 2, art3 volume:3 year:2003 number:2 pages:3 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Global jurist / Frontiers |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Killion, M. Ulric @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ219537259 |
| id |
NLEJ219553726 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219553726</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707085657.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090716s2003 xxu|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219553726</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Killion, M. Ulric</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">The Berkeley Electronic Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">constitutionalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neo-liberalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">liberalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Global jurist / Frontiers</subfield><subfield code="d">Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">3.2003, 2, art3</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219537259</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2115503-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1535-1653</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-BEP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">3</subfield><subfield code="y">3.2003, 2, art3</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals |
| author |
Killion, M. Ulric |
| spellingShingle |
Killion, M. Ulric misc China misc constitutionalism misc neo-liberalism misc liberalism China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |
| authorStr |
Killion, M. Ulric |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ219537259 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1535-1653 |
| topic_title |
China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism China constitutionalism neo-liberalism liberalism |
| publisher |
The Berkeley Electronic Press |
| publisherStr |
The Berkeley Electronic Press |
| topic |
misc China misc constitutionalism misc neo-liberalism misc liberalism |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc China misc constitutionalism misc neo-liberalism misc liberalism |
| topic_browse |
misc China misc constitutionalism misc neo-liberalism misc liberalism |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Global jurist / Frontiers |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ219537259 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Global jurist / Frontiers |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ219537259 (DE-600)2115503-3 |
| title |
China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ219553726 |
| title_full |
China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |
| author_sort |
Killion, M. Ulric |
| journal |
Global jurist / Frontiers |
| journalStr |
Global jurist / Frontiers |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2003 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
3 |
| author_browse |
Killion, M. Ulric |
| container_volume |
3 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XD-US |
| author-letter |
Killion, M. Ulric |
| title_sort |
china and neo-liberal constitutionalism |
| title_auth |
China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |
| abstract |
This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. |
| abstractGer |
This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-BEP GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism |
| url |
http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ219537259 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:28:46.192Z |
| _version_ |
1803806285437599744 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219553726</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707085657.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090716s2003 xxu|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219553726</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Killion, M. Ulric</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">China and Neo-liberal Constitutionalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">The Berkeley Electronic Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article discusses the probability of growth of neo-liberalism in modern China and its implications for Chinese constitutionalism. A China polity under the vision of a neo-liberal regime engenders problems of prescribing a legal system and identifying constitutional ethos. The genesis of this article is a February 21, 2003, symposium of Chinese neo-liberals, who proffer Chinese neo-liberalism in answer to issues of reforms and Chinese constitutionalism. A Chinese neo-liberal constitutional coterie desiderates immediate democracy and a governmental model that mirrors a United States constitutional government, replete with separation of powers and independent judicial review. Such urgings are arguably a denial of both the historicity of Western liberalism and China's ontological base in tradition, being Confucianism. The historic excesses and abuses of liberalism should serve to frustrate a transplant of neo-liberal constitutionalism in China.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Berkeley Electronic Press Academic Journals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">constitutionalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neo-liberalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">liberalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Global jurist / Frontiers</subfield><subfield code="d">Berkeley, Calif. : Bepress, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">3.2003, 2, art3</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219537259</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2115503-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1535-1653</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.bepress.com/gj/frontiers/vol3/iss2/art3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-BEP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">3</subfield><subfield code="y">3.2003, 2, art3</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400133 |