Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis
What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reas...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2004 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
3 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Development and learning in organizations - Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003, 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:18 ; year:2004 ; number:1 ; pages:24-26 ; extent:3 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/14777280410510427 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ219590346 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ219590346 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707090222.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090811s2004 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/14777280410510427 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ219590346 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2004 | |
| 300 | |a 3 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. | ||
| 533 | |f Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Co-operation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Employees | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Singapore | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Team building | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Training techniques | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Development and learning in organizations |d Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003 |g 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ219577935 |w (DE-600)2112764-5 |x 1477-7282 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2004 |g number:1 |g pages:24-26 |g extent:3 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EFD | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2004 |e 1 |h 24-26 |g 3 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:14777282:2004----::isacnutshpstvhwdetrtannd |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2004 |
| publishDate |
2004 |
| allfields |
10.1108/14777280410510427 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219590346 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis 2004 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques In Development and learning in organizations Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219577935 (DE-600)2112764-5 1477-7282 nnns volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 2004 1 24-26 3 |
| spelling |
10.1108/14777280410510427 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219590346 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis 2004 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques In Development and learning in organizations Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219577935 (DE-600)2112764-5 1477-7282 nnns volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 2004 1 24-26 3 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/14777280410510427 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219590346 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis 2004 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques In Development and learning in organizations Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219577935 (DE-600)2112764-5 1477-7282 nnns volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 2004 1 24-26 3 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/14777280410510427 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219590346 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis 2004 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques In Development and learning in organizations Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219577935 (DE-600)2112764-5 1477-7282 nnns volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 2004 1 24-26 3 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/14777280410510427 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219590346 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis 2004 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques In Development and learning in organizations Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219577935 (DE-600)2112764-5 1477-7282 nnns volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 2004 1 24-26 3 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Development and learning in organizations 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 |
| sourceStr |
In Development and learning in organizations 18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26 volume:18 year:2004 number:1 pages:24-26 extent:3 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Development and learning in organizations |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ219577935 |
| id |
NLEJ219590346 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219590346</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707090222.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2004 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/14777280410510427</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219590346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Co-operation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Singapore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Team building</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Training techniques</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Development and learning in organizations</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219577935</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2112764-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1477-7282</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2004</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:24-26</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2004</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">24-26</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ219577935 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1477-7282 |
| topic_title |
Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis Co-operation Employees Singapore Team building Training techniques |
| topic |
misc Co-operation misc Employees misc Singapore misc Team building misc Training techniques |
| spellingShingle |
misc Co-operation misc Employees misc Singapore misc Team building misc Training techniques Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Co-operation misc Employees misc Singapore misc Team building misc Training techniques |
| topic_browse |
misc Co-operation misc Employees misc Singapore misc Team building misc Training techniques |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Development and learning in organizations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ219577935 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Development and learning in organizations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ219577935 (DE-600)2112764-5 |
| title |
Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ219590346 |
| title_full |
Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| journal |
Development and learning in organizations |
| journalStr |
Development and learning in organizations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2004 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
24 |
| container_volume |
18 |
| physical |
3 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/14777280410510427 |
| title_sort |
kiasu accentuates the positive: how adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| title_auth |
Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| abstract |
What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. |
| abstractGer |
What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ219577935 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1108/14777280410510427 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:35:11.108Z |
| _version_ |
1803806689051279360 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219590346</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707090222.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2004 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/14777280410510427</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219590346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kiasu accentuates the positive: How adventure training disproved hypothesis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What organization would not want staff who could work well as a team, who could get on well with their colleagues, and who would support each other and who pooled their skills, knowledge and effort into the common cause of the enterprise's success? Silly question maybe. After all, the only reason any workforce is a "force" at all, or why any establishment of employees is established in the first place is to work as a unit for the good of the business. Or is it? The answer, of course, is undoubtedly "yes" but the question needs asking, and answering, if only to clear up some confusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Co-operation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Employees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Singapore</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Team building</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Training techniques</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Development and learning in organizations</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB University Press, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2004), 1, Seite 24-26</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219577935</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2112764-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1477-7282</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2004</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:24-26</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777280410510427</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2004</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">24-26</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4001703 |