Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals
Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Des...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Robertson, R. John [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2005 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Library review - Bingley : Emerald, 1927, 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:54 ; year:2005 ; number:5 ; pages:295-300 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/00242530510600543 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ219623112 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ219623112 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707090719.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090811s2005 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/00242530510600543 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ219623112 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Robertson, R. John |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. | ||
| 533 | |f Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Digital libraries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Information science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Librarians | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Professions | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Library review |d Bingley : Emerald, 1927 |g 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ219579547 |w (DE-600)1481827-9 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:2005 |g number:5 |g pages:295-300 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EFD | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 54 |j 2005 |e 5 |h 295-300 |g 6 | ||
| author_variant |
r j r rj rjr |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
robertsonrjohn:2005----:eaaaultipiainfrirradnomto |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2005 |
| publishDate |
2005 |
| allfields |
10.1108/00242530510600543 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219623112 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Robertson, R. John verfasserin aut Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals 2005 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions In Library review Bingley : Emerald, 1927 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219579547 (DE-600)1481827-9 nnns volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 54 2005 5 295-300 6 |
| spelling |
10.1108/00242530510600543 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219623112 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Robertson, R. John verfasserin aut Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals 2005 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions In Library review Bingley : Emerald, 1927 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219579547 (DE-600)1481827-9 nnns volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 54 2005 5 295-300 6 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/00242530510600543 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219623112 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Robertson, R. John verfasserin aut Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals 2005 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions In Library review Bingley : Emerald, 1927 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219579547 (DE-600)1481827-9 nnns volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 54 2005 5 295-300 6 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/00242530510600543 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219623112 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Robertson, R. John verfasserin aut Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals 2005 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions In Library review Bingley : Emerald, 1927 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219579547 (DE-600)1481827-9 nnns volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 54 2005 5 295-300 6 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/00242530510600543 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219623112 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Robertson, R. John verfasserin aut Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals 2005 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions In Library review Bingley : Emerald, 1927 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219579547 (DE-600)1481827-9 nnns volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 54 2005 5 295-300 6 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Library review 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
In Library review 54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300 volume:54 year:2005 number:5 pages:295-300 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Library review |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Robertson, R. John @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ219579547 |
| id |
NLEJ219623112 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219623112</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707090719.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2005 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/00242530510600543</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219623112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robertson, R. John</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Digital libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Librarians</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Professions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Library review</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald, 1927</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219579547</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1481827-9</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:295-300</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">295-300</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
| author |
Robertson, R. John |
| spellingShingle |
Robertson, R. John misc Digital libraries misc Information science misc Librarians misc Professions Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| authorStr |
Robertson, R. John |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ219579547 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals Digital libraries Information science Librarians Professions |
| topic |
misc Digital libraries misc Information science misc Librarians misc Professions |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Digital libraries misc Information science misc Librarians misc Professions |
| topic_browse |
misc Digital libraries misc Information science misc Librarians misc Professions |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Library review |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ219579547 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Library review |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ219579547 (DE-600)1481827-9 |
| title |
Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ219623112 |
| title_full |
Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| author_sort |
Robertson, R. John |
| journal |
Library review |
| journalStr |
Library review |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2005 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
295 |
| author_browse |
Robertson, R. John |
| container_volume |
54 |
| physical |
6 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| author-letter |
Robertson, R. John |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/00242530510600543 |
| title_sort |
metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| title_auth |
Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| abstract |
Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. |
| abstractGer |
Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ219579547 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1108/00242530510600543 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:40:38.950Z |
| _version_ |
1803807032817483776 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219623112</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707090719.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2005 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/00242530510600543</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219623112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robertson, R. John</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata "compromises" they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Digital libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Librarians</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Professions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Library review</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald, 1927</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2005), 5, Seite 295-300</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219579547</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1481827-9</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:295-300</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">295-300</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.402936 |