Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing
Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Archbold, Carol A. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2005 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
19 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Policing - Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997, 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2005 ; number:1 ; pages:30-48 ; extent:19 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/13639510510580968 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ219739420 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ219739420 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707092406.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090811s2005 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/13639510510580968 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ219739420 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Archbold, Carol A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a 19 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. | ||
| 533 | |f Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Liability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Police misconduct | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Policing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk management | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Policing |d Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997 |g 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ219578265 |w (DE-600)1481293-9 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2005 |g number:1 |g pages:30-48 |g extent:19 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EFD | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2005 |e 1 |h 30-48 |g 19 | ||
| author_variant |
c a a ca caa |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
archboldcarola:2005----:aaighbtolnrsmngm |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2005 |
| publishDate |
2005 |
| allfields |
10.1108/13639510510580968 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219739420 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Archbold, Carol A. verfasserin aut Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing 2005 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management In Policing Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578265 (DE-600)1481293-9 nnns volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2005 1 30-48 19 |
| spelling |
10.1108/13639510510580968 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219739420 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Archbold, Carol A. verfasserin aut Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing 2005 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management In Policing Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578265 (DE-600)1481293-9 nnns volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2005 1 30-48 19 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/13639510510580968 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219739420 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Archbold, Carol A. verfasserin aut Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing 2005 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management In Policing Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578265 (DE-600)1481293-9 nnns volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2005 1 30-48 19 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/13639510510580968 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219739420 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Archbold, Carol A. verfasserin aut Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing 2005 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management In Policing Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578265 (DE-600)1481293-9 nnns volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2005 1 30-48 19 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/13639510510580968 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219739420 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Archbold, Carol A. verfasserin aut Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing 2005 19 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management In Policing Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578265 (DE-600)1481293-9 nnns volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2005 1 30-48 19 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Policing 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 |
| sourceStr |
In Policing 28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48 volume:28 year:2005 number:1 pages:30-48 extent:19 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Policing |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Archbold, Carol A. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ219578265 |
| id |
NLEJ219739420 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219739420</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707092406.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2005 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/13639510510580968</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219739420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Archbold, Carol A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Police misconduct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Policing</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219578265</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1481293-9</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:30-48</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">30-48</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
| author |
Archbold, Carol A. |
| spellingShingle |
Archbold, Carol A. misc Liability misc Police misconduct misc Policing misc Risk management Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| authorStr |
Archbold, Carol A. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ219578265 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing Liability Police misconduct Policing Risk management |
| topic |
misc Liability misc Police misconduct misc Policing misc Risk management |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Liability misc Police misconduct misc Policing misc Risk management |
| topic_browse |
misc Liability misc Police misconduct misc Policing misc Risk management |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Policing |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ219578265 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Policing |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ219578265 (DE-600)1481293-9 |
| title |
Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ219739420 |
| title_full |
Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| author_sort |
Archbold, Carol A. |
| journal |
Policing |
| journalStr |
Policing |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2005 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
30 |
| author_browse |
Archbold, Carol A. |
| container_volume |
28 |
| physical |
19 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| author-letter |
Archbold, Carol A. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/13639510510580968 |
| title_sort |
managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| title_auth |
Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| abstract |
Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. |
| abstractGer |
Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ219578265 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1108/13639510510580968 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:59:02.713Z |
| _version_ |
1803808190196875264 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219739420</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707092406.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2005 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/13639510510580968</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219739420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Archbold, Carol A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Managing the bottom line: risk management in policing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose - To present qualitative data illustrating how some of the largest law enforcement agencies in the USA use risk management in their efforts to control police liability. Design/methodology/approach - To explore this topic, two main data sources were utilized: telephone interviews with 354 law enforcement agencies identified the prevalence of the use of risk management by police agencies; and survey data from police agencies provided descriptive information about the roles, duties, and placement of risk managers within each police organization. Findings - Telephone interviews revealed that 14 of the 354 (0.039 percent) law enforcement agencies identified risk management as one of several tools they use to control police-related liability within their organizations. This finding is surprising, given the increase in costs associated with settlements/payouts for police-involved litigation and liability claims over the past few decades. Research limitations/implications - Future research should identify the reasons why police agencies choose not to use risk management in their police liability management efforts. In addition, future research should explore how the characteristics of city government and/or political culture are associated with the use of risk management by law enforcement agencies. Practical implications - This paper can serve as a basic resource for police scholars and practitioners, city/county attorneys, risk managers, and various other city/county agents that are interested in learning about risk management as a way to manage police liability. Originality/value - This paper presents the first national study of risk management in police agencies in the USA.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Police misconduct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Policing</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2005), 1, Seite 30-48</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219578265</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1481293-9</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:30-48</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639510510580968</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">30-48</subfield><subfield code="g">19</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3972235 |