An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process
Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable mai...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1998 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
12 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Integrated manufacturing systems - Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990, 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:9 ; year:1998 ; number:2 ; pages:87-98 ; extent:12 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/09576069810202005 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ219900957 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ219900957 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707094825.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090811s1998 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/09576069810202005 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ219900957 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1998 | |
| 300 | |a 12 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. | ||
| 533 | |f Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Analytical hierarchy process | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Maintenance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Models | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Labib, Ashraf W. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a O'Connor, Richard F. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Williams, Glyn B. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Integrated manufacturing systems |d Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990 |g 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ219578702 |w (DE-600)2029248-X |x 0957-6061 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:1998 |g number:2 |g pages:87-98 |g extent:12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EFD | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 1998 |e 2 |h 87-98 |g 12 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:09576061:1998----::nfetvmitnneytmsntenltc |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1998 |
| publishDate |
1998 |
| allfields |
10.1108/09576069810202005 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219900957 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process 1998 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models Labib, Ashraf W. oth O'Connor, Richard F. oth Williams, Glyn B. oth In Integrated manufacturing systems Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578702 (DE-600)2029248-X 0957-6061 nnns volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 9 1998 2 87-98 12 |
| spelling |
10.1108/09576069810202005 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219900957 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process 1998 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models Labib, Ashraf W. oth O'Connor, Richard F. oth Williams, Glyn B. oth In Integrated manufacturing systems Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578702 (DE-600)2029248-X 0957-6061 nnns volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 9 1998 2 87-98 12 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/09576069810202005 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219900957 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process 1998 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models Labib, Ashraf W. oth O'Connor, Richard F. oth Williams, Glyn B. oth In Integrated manufacturing systems Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578702 (DE-600)2029248-X 0957-6061 nnns volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 9 1998 2 87-98 12 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/09576069810202005 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219900957 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process 1998 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models Labib, Ashraf W. oth O'Connor, Richard F. oth Williams, Glyn B. oth In Integrated manufacturing systems Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578702 (DE-600)2029248-X 0957-6061 nnns volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 9 1998 2 87-98 12 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/09576069810202005 doi (DE-627)NLEJ219900957 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process 1998 12 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models Labib, Ashraf W. oth O'Connor, Richard F. oth Williams, Glyn B. oth In Integrated manufacturing systems Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578702 (DE-600)2029248-X 0957-6061 nnns volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 9 1998 2 87-98 12 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Integrated manufacturing systems 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 |
| sourceStr |
In Integrated manufacturing systems 9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98 volume:9 year:1998 number:2 pages:87-98 extent:12 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Integrated manufacturing systems |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Labib, Ashraf W. @@oth@@ O'Connor, Richard F. @@oth@@ Williams, Glyn B. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1998-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ219578702 |
| id |
NLEJ219900957 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219900957</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707094825.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s1998 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/09576069810202005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219900957</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytical hierarchy process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maintenance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Labib, Ashraf W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O'Connor, Richard F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, Glyn B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Integrated manufacturing systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219578702</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2029248-X</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-6061</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1998</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:87-98</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">1998</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">87-98</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ219578702 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0957-6061 |
| topic_title |
An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process Analytical hierarchy process Decision making Maintenance Models |
| topic |
misc Analytical hierarchy process misc Decision making misc Maintenance misc Models |
| spellingShingle |
misc Analytical hierarchy process misc Decision making misc Maintenance misc Models An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Analytical hierarchy process misc Decision making misc Maintenance misc Models |
| topic_browse |
misc Analytical hierarchy process misc Decision making misc Maintenance misc Models |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
a w l aw awl r f o rf rfo g b w gb gbw |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Integrated manufacturing systems |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ219578702 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Integrated manufacturing systems |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ219578702 (DE-600)2029248-X |
| title |
An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ219900957 |
| title_full |
An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| journal |
Integrated manufacturing systems |
| journalStr |
Integrated manufacturing systems |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1998 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
87 |
| container_volume |
9 |
| physical |
12 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/09576069810202005 |
| title_sort |
an effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| title_auth |
An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| abstract |
Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. |
| abstractGer |
Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Labib, Ashraf W. O'Connor, Richard F. Williams, Glyn B. |
| author2Str |
Labib, Ashraf W. O'Connor, Richard F. Williams, Glyn B. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ219578702 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1108/09576069810202005 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T06:25:34.155Z |
| _version_ |
1803809858945810432 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ219900957</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707094825.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s1998 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/09576069810202005</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ219900957</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Attempts to develop a model of maintenance decision making using the analytic hierarchy (AHP). Describes problems in maintenance arising from not having clear criteria and not having robust decisions with which to maintain failing equipment. The objective being to develop a dynamic and adaptable maintenance system that utilises existing data and supports decisions accordingly. Proposes a three-stage system that can handle multiple criteria decision analysis, conflicting objectives, and subjective judgements. Moreover, the methodology facilitates and supports a group decision-making process. This systematic, and adaptable, approach will determine what specific actions to perform given current working conditions. The first stage involves identifying the criteria upon which engineering personnel wish to formulate a maintenance decision, or action. The second stage is to prioritise the different criteria by implementing a multiple-criteria evaluation method. Finally, based on different criteria, machines are ranked according to criticality. This is followed by an analysis of failures in a graphical and a hierarchical format.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analytical hierarchy process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maintenance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Labib, Ashraf W.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O'Connor, Richard F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Williams, Glyn B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Integrated manufacturing systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : Emerald Group Publ., 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">9(1998), 2, Seite 87-98</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219578702</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2029248-X</subfield><subfield code="x">0957-6061</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1998</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:87-98</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576069810202005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">1998</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">87-98</subfield><subfield code="g">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.40028 |