Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management
Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2002 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
8 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Business process management journal - Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995, 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2002 ; number:2 ; pages:161-168 ; extent:8 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/14637150210425117 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ220021600 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ220021600 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707100617.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090811s2002 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/14637150210425117 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ220021600 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a 8 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. | ||
| 533 | |f Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Contingency theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Organization theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Process | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Uncertainty | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Robert T. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ryan, Chuck |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Business process management journal |d Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995 |g 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ219578427 |w (DE-600)2014421-0 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g pages:161-168 |g extent:8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EFD | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 2002 |e 2 |h 161-168 |g 8 | ||
| matchkey_str |
jonesroberttryanchuck:2002----:acigrcscocadnetitmdlnq |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2002 |
| publishDate |
2002 |
| allfields |
10.1108/14637150210425117 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220021600 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management 2002 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty Jones, Robert T. oth Ryan, Chuck oth In Business process management journal Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578427 (DE-600)2014421-0 nnns volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2002 2 161-168 8 |
| spelling |
10.1108/14637150210425117 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220021600 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management 2002 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty Jones, Robert T. oth Ryan, Chuck oth In Business process management journal Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578427 (DE-600)2014421-0 nnns volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2002 2 161-168 8 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/14637150210425117 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220021600 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management 2002 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty Jones, Robert T. oth Ryan, Chuck oth In Business process management journal Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578427 (DE-600)2014421-0 nnns volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2002 2 161-168 8 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/14637150210425117 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220021600 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management 2002 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty Jones, Robert T. oth Ryan, Chuck oth In Business process management journal Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578427 (DE-600)2014421-0 nnns volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2002 2 161-168 8 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/14637150210425117 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220021600 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management 2002 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty Jones, Robert T. oth Ryan, Chuck oth In Business process management journal Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ219578427 (DE-600)2014421-0 nnns volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2002 2 161-168 8 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Business process management journal 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 |
| sourceStr |
In Business process management journal 8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168 volume:8 year:2002 number:2 pages:161-168 extent:8 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Business process management journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jones, Robert T. @@oth@@ Ryan, Chuck @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2002-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ219578427 |
| id |
NLEJ220021600 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ220021600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707100617.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2002 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/14637150210425117</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ220021600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contingency theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organization theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quality management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Robert T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ryan, Chuck</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Business process management journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219578427</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2014421-0</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:161-168</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">161-168</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ219578427 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management Contingency theory Organization theory Process Quality management Uncertainty |
| topic |
misc Contingency theory misc Organization theory misc Process misc Quality management misc Uncertainty |
| spellingShingle |
misc Contingency theory misc Organization theory misc Process misc Quality management misc Uncertainty Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Contingency theory misc Organization theory misc Process misc Quality management misc Uncertainty |
| topic_browse |
misc Contingency theory misc Organization theory misc Process misc Quality management misc Uncertainty |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r t j rt rtj c r cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Business process management journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ219578427 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Business process management journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ219578427 (DE-600)2014421-0 |
| title |
Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ220021600 |
| title_full |
Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management |
| journal |
Business process management journal |
| journalStr |
Business process management journal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2002 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
161 |
| container_volume |
8 |
| physical |
8 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/14637150210425117 |
| title_sort |
matching process choice and uncertainty: modeling quality management |
| title_auth |
Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management |
| abstract |
Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. |
| abstractGer |
Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Jones, Robert T. Ryan, Chuck |
| author2Str |
Jones, Robert T. Ryan, Chuck |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ219578427 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1108/14637150210425117 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T06:45:11.498Z |
| _version_ |
1803811093478375424 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ220021600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707100617.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2002 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/14637150210425117</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ220021600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Matching process choice and uncertainty: Modeling quality management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on organizational theory, a contingency model of quality management practices is proposed, whereby quality management orientation, process choice, and environmental uncertainty are the contextualizing variables. The model posits that to maximize quality and firm performance, quality management practices must be congruent with the particular situation within which the firm finds itself. Thus, no one set of quality management practices can be implemented and be expected to increase performance in all environments. The model suggests reasons for quality management program failures found in recent research and the popular press. Research propositions and implications are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Contingency theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organization theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quality management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Uncertainty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jones, Robert T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ryan, Chuck</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Business process management journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2002), 2, Seite 161-168</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ219578427</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2014421-0</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:161-168</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150210425117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">161-168</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398386 |