Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery
Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2002 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: British journal of clinical governance - Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999, 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:2002 ; number:2 ; pages:75-80 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/14664100210427570 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ220023786 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ220023786 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707100636.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 090811s2002 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/14664100210427570 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ220023786 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. | ||
| 533 | |f Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Hospitals | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Operational audit | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Procedures | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Clark, S. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Greenwood, M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t British journal of clinical governance |d Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999 |g 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ21957815X |w (DE-600)2013028-4 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g pages:75-80 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-EFD | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2002 |e 2 |h 75-80 |g 6 | ||
| matchkey_str |
clarksgreenwoodm:2002----:hobeblcrpyaipatcioaada |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2002 |
| publishDate |
2002 |
| allfields |
10.1108/14664100210427570 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220023786 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2002 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Hospitals Operational audit Procedures Clark, S. oth Greenwood, M. oth In British journal of clinical governance Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ21957815X (DE-600)2013028-4 nnns volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2002 2 75-80 6 |
| spelling |
10.1108/14664100210427570 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220023786 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2002 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Hospitals Operational audit Procedures Clark, S. oth Greenwood, M. oth In British journal of clinical governance Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ21957815X (DE-600)2013028-4 nnns volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2002 2 75-80 6 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/14664100210427570 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220023786 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2002 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Hospitals Operational audit Procedures Clark, S. oth Greenwood, M. oth In British journal of clinical governance Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ21957815X (DE-600)2013028-4 nnns volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2002 2 75-80 6 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/14664100210427570 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220023786 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2002 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Hospitals Operational audit Procedures Clark, S. oth Greenwood, M. oth In British journal of clinical governance Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ21957815X (DE-600)2013028-4 nnns volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2002 2 75-80 6 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/14664100210427570 doi (DE-627)NLEJ220023786 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery 2002 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 Hospitals Operational audit Procedures Clark, S. oth Greenwood, M. oth In British journal of clinical governance Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ21957815X (DE-600)2013028-4 nnns volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2002 2 75-80 6 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In British journal of clinical governance 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
In British journal of clinical governance 7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80 volume:7 year:2002 number:2 pages:75-80 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Hospitals Operational audit Procedures |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
British journal of clinical governance |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Clark, S. @@oth@@ Greenwood, M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2002-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ21957815X |
| id |
NLEJ220023786 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ220023786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707100636.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2002 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/14664100210427570</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ220023786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hospitals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Operational audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Procedures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clark, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greenwood, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">British journal of clinical governance</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ21957815X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013028-4</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:75-80</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">75-80</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005 |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ21957815X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery Hospitals Operational audit Procedures |
| topic |
misc Hospitals misc Operational audit misc Procedures |
| spellingShingle |
misc Hospitals misc Operational audit misc Procedures Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Hospitals misc Operational audit misc Procedures |
| topic_browse |
misc Hospitals misc Operational audit misc Procedures |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s c sc m g mg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
British journal of clinical governance |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ21957815X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
British journal of clinical governance |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ21957815X (DE-600)2013028-4 |
| title |
Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ220023786 |
| title_full |
Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| journal |
British journal of clinical governance |
| journalStr |
British journal of clinical governance |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2002 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
75 |
| container_volume |
7 |
| physical |
6 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/14664100210427570 |
| title_sort |
thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| title_auth |
Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| abstract |
Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. |
| abstractGer |
Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-EFD GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Clark, S. Greenwood, M. |
| author2Str |
Clark, S. Greenwood, M. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ21957815X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1108/14664100210427570 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T06:45:32.827Z |
| _version_ |
1803811115844501504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ220023786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707100636.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090811s2002 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/14664100210427570</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ220023786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Thromboembolic prophylaxis: practice in oral and maxillofacial surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Describes how the implementation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures was audited. In 1997, four oral and maxillofacial units were asked about their practice of prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (TED). Proformas were sent to each unit to assess 45 patients retrospectively. These patients were chosen at random from within defined groups of surgery. The audit was repeated in 1998, after presentation and discussion of initial findings. Of 117 patients at low risk of TED, 72 (62 per cent) and 50 (81 per cent) of 62 patients at moderate risk received prophylaxis. In the second run of the audit, there was a 7 per cent increase in the number of patients at moderate risk receiving prophylaxis. Patients admitted for trauma surgery were the most likely to have TED prophylaxis omitted. Concludes that there was an improvement between the first and second run of the audit, but some patients were still not being treated appropriately.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hospitals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Operational audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Procedures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clark, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greenwood, M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">British journal of clinical governance</subfield><subfield code="d">Bradford : MCB Univ. Press, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2002), 2, Seite 75-80</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ21957815X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013028-4</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:75-80</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14664100210427570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">75-80</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399617 |