Theological Originality
In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Burke, T. E. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ; 1976 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
20 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Religious studies - Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965, 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:1976 ; number:1 ; month:03 ; pages:1-20 ; extent:20 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ225360500 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ225360500 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706062919.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 091218s1976 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500008969 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ225360500 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Burke, T. E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Theological Originality |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 1976 | |
| 300 | |a 20 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. | ||
| 533 | |f Cambridge Journals Digital Archives | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 |w (DE-627)NLEJ224554042 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1976 |g number:1 |g month:03 |g pages:1-20 |g extent:20 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-CUP | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 1976 |e 1 |c 03 |h 1-20 |g 20 | ||
| author_variant |
t e b te teb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1469901X:1976----::hooiaoi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1976 |
| publishDate |
1976 |
| allfields |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225360500 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Burke, T. E. verfasserin aut Theological Originality Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1976 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In Religious studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 (DE-627)NLEJ224554042 (DE-600)1466479-3 1469-901X nnns volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1976 1 03 1-20 20 |
| spelling |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225360500 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Burke, T. E. verfasserin aut Theological Originality Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1976 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In Religious studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 (DE-627)NLEJ224554042 (DE-600)1466479-3 1469-901X nnns volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1976 1 03 1-20 20 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225360500 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Burke, T. E. verfasserin aut Theological Originality Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1976 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In Religious studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 (DE-627)NLEJ224554042 (DE-600)1466479-3 1469-901X nnns volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1976 1 03 1-20 20 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225360500 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Burke, T. E. verfasserin aut Theological Originality Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1976 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In Religious studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 (DE-627)NLEJ224554042 (DE-600)1466479-3 1469-901X nnns volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1976 1 03 1-20 20 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225360500 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Burke, T. E. verfasserin aut Theological Originality Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1976 20 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In Religious studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 (DE-627)NLEJ224554042 (DE-600)1466479-3 1469-901X nnns volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 1976 1 03 1-20 20 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Religious studies 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 |
| sourceStr |
In Religious studies 12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20 volume:12 year:1976 number:1 month:03 pages:1-20 extent:20 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Religious studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Burke, T. E. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1976-03-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ224554042 |
| id |
NLEJ225360500 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ225360500</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706062919.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">091218s1976 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/S0034412500008969</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ225360500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burke, T. E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theological Originality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1976</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Cambridge Journals Digital Archives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Religious studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ224554042</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466479-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1469-901X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1976</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-20</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-CUP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">1976</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1-20</subfield><subfield code="g">20</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives |
| author |
Burke, T. E. |
| spellingShingle |
Burke, T. E. Theological Originality |
| authorStr |
Burke, T. E. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ224554042 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Cambridge |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1469-901X |
| topic_title |
Theological Originality |
| publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
| publisherStr |
Cambridge University Press |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Religious studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ224554042 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Religious studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ224554042 (DE-600)1466479-3 |
| title |
Theological Originality |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ225360500 |
| title_full |
Theological Originality |
| author_sort |
Burke, T. E. |
| journal |
Religious studies |
| journalStr |
Religious studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1976 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Burke, T. E. |
| container_volume |
12 |
| physical |
20 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| author-letter |
Burke, T. E. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 |
| title_sort |
theological originality |
| title_auth |
Theological Originality |
| abstract |
In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. |
| abstractGer |
In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Theological Originality |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ224554042 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1017/S0034412500008969 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:40:23.661Z |
| _version_ |
1803807016784756736 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ225360500</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706062919.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">091218s1976 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/S0034412500008969</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ225360500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burke, T. E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theological Originality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1976</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion, or for that matter of any branch of philosophy, the names of Whitehead and Wittgenstein are not often linked. Whitehead's later work is, for the most part, treated as a rather specialized interest, an attractively under-cultivated field for the enterprising thesis-writer perhaps, but well away from the main centres of current philosophical activity. And what he has to say about specifically religious or theological issues (apart from the often quoted or misquoted ‘Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness‘)1 becomes simply one ramification of an ingenious but somewhat eccentric system. Nonetheless, there is at least this much justification for considering it in relation to the much more influential and widely discussed views of Wittgenstein. Whitehead has some original things to say about God, Wittgenstein some original reasons for thinking that Whitehead's brand of originality is here radically misplaced. And the possibility or otherwise of such theological originality is an issue of very considerable importance for the philosophy of religion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Cambridge Journals Digital Archives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Religious studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965</subfield><subfield code="g">12(1976), 1 vom: März, Seite 1-20</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ224554042</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466479-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1469-901X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1976</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-20</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-CUP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">1976</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1-20</subfield><subfield code="g">20</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3987713 |