A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark
In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably di...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Downing, F. Gerald [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ; 1992 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
22 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: New Testament studies - Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954, 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:38 ; year:1992 ; number:1 ; month:01 ; pages:15-36 ; extent:22 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ225465698 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ225465698 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210706064421.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 091218s1992 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0028688500023055 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ225465698 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XA-GB | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Downing, F. Gerald |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 1992 | |
| 300 | |a 22 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. | ||
| 533 | |f Cambridge Journals Digital Archives | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t New Testament studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 |g 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 |w (DE-627)NLEJ224554115 |w (DE-600)1483312-8 |x 1469-8145 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:1992 |g number:1 |g month:01 |g pages:15-36 |g extent:22 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-CUP | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 1992 |e 1 |c 01 |h 15-36 |g 22 | ||
| author_variant |
f g d fg fgd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14698145:1992----::prdgprlxueat |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1992 |
| publishDate |
1992 |
| allfields |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225465698 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Downing, F. Gerald verfasserin aut A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1992 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In New Testament studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 (DE-627)NLEJ224554115 (DE-600)1483312-8 1469-8145 nnns volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 38 1992 1 01 15-36 22 |
| spelling |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225465698 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Downing, F. Gerald verfasserin aut A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1992 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In New Testament studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 (DE-627)NLEJ224554115 (DE-600)1483312-8 1469-8145 nnns volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 38 1992 1 01 15-36 22 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225465698 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Downing, F. Gerald verfasserin aut A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1992 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In New Testament studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 (DE-627)NLEJ224554115 (DE-600)1483312-8 1469-8145 nnns volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 38 1992 1 01 15-36 22 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225465698 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Downing, F. Gerald verfasserin aut A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1992 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In New Testament studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 (DE-627)NLEJ224554115 (DE-600)1483312-8 1469-8145 nnns volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 38 1992 1 01 15-36 22 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 doi (DE-627)NLEJ225465698 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng XA-GB Downing, F. Gerald verfasserin aut A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1992 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. Cambridge Journals Digital Archives In New Testament studies Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 (DE-627)NLEJ224554115 (DE-600)1483312-8 1469-8145 nnns volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 38 1992 1 01 15-36 22 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In New Testament studies 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 |
| sourceStr |
In New Testament studies 38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36 volume:38 year:1992 number:1 month:01 pages:15-36 extent:22 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
New Testament studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Downing, F. Gerald @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1992-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ224554115 |
| id |
NLEJ225465698 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ225465698</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706064421.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">091218s1992 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/S0028688500023055</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ225465698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Downing, F. Gerald</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Cambridge Journals Digital Archives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">New Testament studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954</subfield><subfield code="g">38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ224554115</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483312-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1469-8145</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1992</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:15-36</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-CUP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">1992</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">15-36</subfield><subfield code="g">22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives |
| author |
Downing, F. Gerald |
| spellingShingle |
Downing, F. Gerald A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| authorStr |
Downing, F. Gerald |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ224554115 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Cambridge |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1469-8145 |
| topic_title |
A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
| publisherStr |
Cambridge University Press |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
New Testament studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ224554115 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
New Testament studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ224554115 (DE-600)1483312-8 |
| title |
A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ225465698 |
| title_full |
A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| author_sort |
Downing, F. Gerald |
| journal |
New Testament studies |
| journalStr |
New Testament studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1992 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
15 |
| author_browse |
Downing, F. Gerald |
| container_volume |
38 |
| physical |
22 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| countryofpublication_str_mv |
XA-GB |
| author-letter |
Downing, F. Gerald |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 |
| title_sort |
a paradigm perplex: luke, matthew and mark |
| title_auth |
A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| abstract |
In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. |
| abstractGer |
In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-CUP GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ224554115 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1017/S0028688500023055 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:52:29.456Z |
| _version_ |
1803807777838071808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ225465698</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210706064421.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">091218s1992 xxk|||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/S0028688500023055</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ225465698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Downing, F. Gerald</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Cambridge Journals Digital Archives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">New Testament studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1954</subfield><subfield code="g">38(1992), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 15-36</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ224554115</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483312-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1469-8145</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:38</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1992</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:15-36</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500023055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-CUP</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">38</subfield><subfield code="j">1992</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">15-36</subfield><subfield code="g">22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398756 |