CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE
A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views thes...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Traum, David R. [verfasserIn] Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd ; 1992 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
---|
Reproduktion: |
2007 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Computational intelligence - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985, 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:1992 ; number:3 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ238512665 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ238512665 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210707063720.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 120417s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ238512665 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Traum, David R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Blackwell Publishing Ltd |c 1992 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. | ||
533 | |d 2007 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2007|||||||||| | ||
650 | 4 | |a speech acts | |
700 | 1 | |a Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Computational intelligence |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985 |g 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243926685 |w (DE-600)2016539-0 |x 1467-8640 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:1992 |g number:3 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 1992 |e 3 |h 0 |
author_variant |
d r t dr drt e a h ea eah |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14678640:1992----::ovraincsnakretdp |
hierarchy_sort_str |
1992 |
publishDate |
1992 |
allfields |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ238512665 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Traum, David R. verfasserin aut CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1992 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| speech acts Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. verfasserin aut In Computational intelligence Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243926685 (DE-600)2016539-0 1467-8640 nnns volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 1992 3 0 |
spelling |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ238512665 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Traum, David R. verfasserin aut CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1992 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| speech acts Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. verfasserin aut In Computational intelligence Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243926685 (DE-600)2016539-0 1467-8640 nnns volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 1992 3 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ238512665 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Traum, David R. verfasserin aut CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1992 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| speech acts Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. verfasserin aut In Computational intelligence Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243926685 (DE-600)2016539-0 1467-8640 nnns volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 1992 3 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ238512665 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Traum, David R. verfasserin aut CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1992 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| speech acts Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. verfasserin aut In Computational intelligence Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243926685 (DE-600)2016539-0 1467-8640 nnns volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 1992 3 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ238512665 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Traum, David R. verfasserin aut CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1992 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| speech acts Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. verfasserin aut In Computational intelligence Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243926685 (DE-600)2016539-0 1467-8640 nnns volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 1992 3 0 |
source |
In Computational intelligence 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
In Computational intelligence 8(1992), 3, Seite 0 volume:8 year:1992 number:3 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
speech acts |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Computational intelligence |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Traum, David R. @@aut@@ Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1992-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243926685 |
id |
NLEJ238512665 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ238512665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707063720.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120417s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ238512665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traum, David R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2007</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2007||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">speech acts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hinkelman, Elizabeth A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Computational intelligence</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">8(1992), 3, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243926685</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2016539-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1467-8640</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1992</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">1992</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
author |
Traum, David R. |
spellingShingle |
Traum, David R. misc speech acts CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE |
authorStr |
Traum, David R. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243926685 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
NL |
publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1467-8640 |
topic_title |
CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE speech acts |
publisher |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
topic |
misc speech acts |
topic_unstemmed |
misc speech acts |
topic_browse |
misc speech acts |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Computational intelligence |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243926685 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Computational intelligence |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243926685 (DE-600)2016539-0 |
title |
CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ238512665 |
title_full |
CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE |
author_sort |
Traum, David R. |
journal |
Computational intelligence |
journalStr |
Computational intelligence |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1992 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Traum, David R. Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |
container_volume |
8 |
physical |
Online-Ressource |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Traum, David R. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue |
title_auth |
CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE |
abstract |
A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. |
abstractGer |
A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. |
abstract_unstemmed |
A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |
author2Str |
Hinkelman, Elizabeth A. |
ppnlink |
NLEJ243926685 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x |
up_date |
2024-07-06T05:19:05.535Z |
_version_ |
1803805676572508160 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ238512665</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707063720.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120417s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ238512665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Traum, David R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK-ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A linguistic form's compositional, timeless meaning can be surrounded or even contradicted by various social, aesthetic, or analogistic companion meanings. This paper addresses a series of problems in the structure of spoken language discourse, including turn-taking and grounding. It views these processes as composed of fine-grained actions, which resemble speech acts both in resulting from a computational mechanism of planning and in having a rich relationship to the specific linguistic features which serve to indicate their presence. The resulting notion of Conversation Acts is more general than speech act theory, encompassing not only the traditional speech acts but turn-taking, grounding, and higher-level argumentation acts as well. Furthermore, the traditional speech acts in this scheme become fully joint actions, whose successful performance requires full listener participation. This paper presents a detailed analysis of spoken language dialogue. It shows the role of each class of conversation acts in discourse structure, and discusses how each class can be processed and recognized. Conversation acts, it will be seen, better account for the success of conversation than speech act theory alone. They also provide a pragmatic view of meaning in which the literal/non-literal distinction is simply irrelevant.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2007</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2007||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">speech acts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hinkelman, Elizabeth A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Computational intelligence</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">8(1992), 3, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243926685</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2016539-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1467-8640</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1992</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00380.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">1992</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399703 |