Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s
Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rathe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Lang, Niklaus P. [verfasserIn] Brägger, Urs [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd ; 1991 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2005 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of clinical periodontology - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974, 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:18 ; year:1991 ; number:6 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ240721314 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ240721314 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506173921.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120426s1991 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ240721314 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lang, Niklaus P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Blackwell Publishing Ltd |c 1991 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. | ||
| 533 | |d 2005 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2005|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a diagnostic tests | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brägger, Urs |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of clinical periodontology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 |g 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927142 |w (DE-600)2026349-1 |x 1600-051X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:1991 |g number:6 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 1991 |e 6 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
n p l np npl u b ub |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1600051X:1991----::eidnadanss |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1991 |
| publishDate |
1991 |
| allfields |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240721314 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Lang, Niklaus P. verfasserin aut Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1991 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| diagnostic tests Brägger, Urs verfasserin aut In Journal of clinical periodontology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927142 (DE-600)2026349-1 1600-051X nnns volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1991 6 0 |
| spelling |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240721314 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Lang, Niklaus P. verfasserin aut Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1991 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| diagnostic tests Brägger, Urs verfasserin aut In Journal of clinical periodontology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927142 (DE-600)2026349-1 1600-051X nnns volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1991 6 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240721314 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Lang, Niklaus P. verfasserin aut Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1991 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| diagnostic tests Brägger, Urs verfasserin aut In Journal of clinical periodontology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927142 (DE-600)2026349-1 1600-051X nnns volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1991 6 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240721314 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Lang, Niklaus P. verfasserin aut Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1991 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| diagnostic tests Brägger, Urs verfasserin aut In Journal of clinical periodontology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927142 (DE-600)2026349-1 1600-051X nnns volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1991 6 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240721314 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Lang, Niklaus P. verfasserin aut Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1991 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| diagnostic tests Brägger, Urs verfasserin aut In Journal of clinical periodontology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927142 (DE-600)2026349-1 1600-051X nnns volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1991 6 0 |
| source |
In Journal of clinical periodontology 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of clinical periodontology 18(1991), 6, Seite 0 volume:18 year:1991 number:6 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
diagnostic tests |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of clinical periodontology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Lang, Niklaus P. @@aut@@ Brägger, Urs @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1991-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927142 |
| id |
NLEJ240721314 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ240721314</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506173921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120426s1991 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ240721314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lang, Niklaus P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2005</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2005||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diagnostic tests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brägger, Urs</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of clinical periodontology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974</subfield><subfield code="g">18(1991), 6, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927142</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2026349-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1600-051X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1991</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">1991</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
Lang, Niklaus P. |
| spellingShingle |
Lang, Niklaus P. misc diagnostic tests Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| authorStr |
Lang, Niklaus P. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927142 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1600-051X |
| topic_title |
Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s diagnostic tests |
| publisher |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| topic |
misc diagnostic tests |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc diagnostic tests |
| topic_browse |
misc diagnostic tests |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of clinical periodontology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927142 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of clinical periodontology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927142 (DE-600)2026349-1 |
| title |
Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ240721314 |
| title_full |
Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| author_sort |
Lang, Niklaus P. |
| journal |
Journal of clinical periodontology |
| journalStr |
Journal of clinical periodontology |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1991 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Lang, Niklaus P. Brägger, Urs |
| container_volume |
18 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Lang, Niklaus P. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| title_auth |
Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| abstract |
Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Brägger, Urs |
| author2Str |
Brägger, Urs |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927142 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T10:43:41.984Z |
| _version_ |
1803826099110543360 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ240721314</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506173921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120426s1991 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ240721314</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lang, Niklaus P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Periodontal diagnosis in the 1990s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract. Clinicians are usually inclined to reduce data obtained from diagnosis to a simpler form such as “yes or no” answers in order to obtain useful parameters for daily practice. It should be realized, however, that the diagnostic process very rarely exhibits “black and white” situations. Rather the evaluation of numerous “grey levels” is imperative. The diagnostic process, therefore, remains always incomplete and inaccurate, and it represents an evaluation of probabilities rather than certainties. For this reason, the diagnostician should realize and understand the mathematical relations between the information provided by diagnostic tests and the clinical situation actually present at the time of the test. This will allow one to convert diagnostic results into therapeutic procedures with a high degree of confidence. Since results from diagnostic tests are quite often used to decide on treatment, complex data are reduced to simple dichotomy, such as presence or absence of disease, normal or abnormal conditions, etc. In order to react to diagnostic tests in an ordinal, dichotomous manner, the clinician has to choose a particular level of a test at which he initiates treatment without having the assurance that this level represents the one and only standard at which treatment has to be initiated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2005</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2005||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diagnostic tests</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brägger, Urs</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of clinical periodontology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974</subfield><subfield code="g">18(1991), 6, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927142</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2026349-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1600-051X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1991</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02303.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">1991</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399493 |