Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible
Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Elliott, Rogers [verfasserIn] Farrington, Beth [verfasserIn] Manheimer, Holly [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd ; 1988 |
---|
Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
---|
Reproduktion: |
2006 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of applied social psychology - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971, 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:18 ; year:1988 ; number:16 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ240836820 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ240836820 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210707121547.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 120426s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ240836820 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Elliott, Rogers |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Blackwell Publishing Ltd |c 1988 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. | ||
533 | |d 2006 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2006|||||||||| | ||
700 | 1 | |a Farrington, Beth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Manheimer, Holly |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of applied social psychology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971 |g 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927274 |w (DE-600)2066531-3 |x 1559-1816 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:1988 |g number:16 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 1988 |e 16 |h 0 |
author_variant |
r e re b f bf h m hm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:15591816:1988----::ywtessrdbend |
hierarchy_sort_str |
1988 |
publishDate |
1988 |
allfields |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240836820 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Elliott, Rogers verfasserin aut Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1988 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| Farrington, Beth verfasserin aut Manheimer, Holly verfasserin aut In Journal of applied social psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927274 (DE-600)2066531-3 1559-1816 nnns volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1988 16 0 |
spelling |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240836820 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Elliott, Rogers verfasserin aut Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1988 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| Farrington, Beth verfasserin aut Manheimer, Holly verfasserin aut In Journal of applied social psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927274 (DE-600)2066531-3 1559-1816 nnns volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1988 16 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240836820 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Elliott, Rogers verfasserin aut Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1988 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| Farrington, Beth verfasserin aut Manheimer, Holly verfasserin aut In Journal of applied social psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927274 (DE-600)2066531-3 1559-1816 nnns volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1988 16 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240836820 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Elliott, Rogers verfasserin aut Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1988 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| Farrington, Beth verfasserin aut Manheimer, Holly verfasserin aut In Journal of applied social psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927274 (DE-600)2066531-3 1559-1816 nnns volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1988 16 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ240836820 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Elliott, Rogers verfasserin aut Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1988 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| Farrington, Beth verfasserin aut Manheimer, Holly verfasserin aut In Journal of applied social psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927274 (DE-600)2066531-3 1559-1816 nnns volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 18 1988 16 0 |
source |
In Journal of applied social psychology 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of applied social psychology 18(1988), 16, Seite 0 volume:18 year:1988 number:16 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of applied social psychology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Elliott, Rogers @@aut@@ Farrington, Beth @@aut@@ Manheimer, Holly @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1988-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927274 |
id |
NLEJ240836820 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ240836820</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707121547.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120426s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ240836820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elliott, Rogers</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2006</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2006||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Farrington, Beth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manheimer, Holly</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of applied social psychology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">18(1988), 16, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927274</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2066531-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1559-1816</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:16</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">16</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
author |
Elliott, Rogers |
spellingShingle |
Elliott, Rogers Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
authorStr |
Elliott, Rogers |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927274 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
NL |
publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1559-1816 |
topic_title |
Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
publisher |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of applied social psychology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927274 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of applied social psychology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927274 (DE-600)2066531-3 |
title |
Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ240836820 |
title_full |
Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
author_sort |
Elliott, Rogers |
journal |
Journal of applied social psychology |
journalStr |
Journal of applied social psychology |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1988 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Elliott, Rogers Farrington, Beth Manheimer, Holly |
container_volume |
18 |
physical |
Online-Ressource |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Elliott, Rogers |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
eyewitnesses credible and discredible |
title_auth |
Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
abstract |
Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. |
abstractGer |
Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
16 |
title_short |
Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Farrington, Beth Manheimer, Holly |
author2Str |
Farrington, Beth Manheimer, Holly |
ppnlink |
NLEJ243927274 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x |
up_date |
2024-07-06T10:58:53.117Z |
_version_ |
1803827054502739968 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ240836820</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707121547.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120426s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ240836820</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elliott, Rogers</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Eyewitnesses Credible and Discredible</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Undergraduate subjects read descriptions of two armed robbery cases that varied in the degree to which physical and circumstantial evidence alone would evoke a judgment of guilt. The effect on such judgments of the addition of an eyewitness identifying the defendant, and the effect of discrediting such eyewitness testimony were studied, along with the effects of altering the evidentiary standard (reasonable doubt or preponderance of the evidence), in both between- and within-subjects designs. The different cases, the different conditions of testimony, and the different standards of proof had large effects on judgment. Testimony discrediting an eyewitness was fully effective in lowering the rate of guilt judgments, regardless of the strength of the physical and circumstantial evidence, the standard of proof, or whether or not subjects made serial judgments after reading successive increments to the summaries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2006</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2006||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Farrington, Beth</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Manheimer, Holly</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of applied social psychology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">18(1988), 16, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927274</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2066531-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1559-1816</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:16</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01215.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">16</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4004793 |