AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY
Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an altern...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. [verfasserIn] HICKMAN, MATTHEW [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd ; 1999 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2006 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Criminology - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970, 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:37 ; year:1999 ; number:2 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ242505430 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ242505430 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707160110.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ242505430 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a PIQUERO, ALEX R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Blackwell Publishing Ltd |c 1999 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. | ||
| 533 | |d 2006 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2006|||||||||| | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a HICKMAN, MATTHEW |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Criminology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970 |g 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927339 |w (DE-600)2066199-X |x 1745-9125 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:1999 |g number:2 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 37 |j 1999 |e 2 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
a r p ar arp m h mh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:17459125:1999----::nmiiatsottlsotob |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1999 |
| publishDate |
1999 |
| allfields |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242505430 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb PIQUERO, ALEX R. verfasserin aut AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| HICKMAN, MATTHEW verfasserin aut In Criminology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927339 (DE-600)2066199-X 1745-9125 nnns volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 1999 2 0 |
| spelling |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242505430 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb PIQUERO, ALEX R. verfasserin aut AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| HICKMAN, MATTHEW verfasserin aut In Criminology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927339 (DE-600)2066199-X 1745-9125 nnns volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 1999 2 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242505430 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb PIQUERO, ALEX R. verfasserin aut AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| HICKMAN, MATTHEW verfasserin aut In Criminology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927339 (DE-600)2066199-X 1745-9125 nnns volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 1999 2 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242505430 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb PIQUERO, ALEX R. verfasserin aut AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| HICKMAN, MATTHEW verfasserin aut In Criminology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927339 (DE-600)2066199-X 1745-9125 nnns volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 1999 2 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242505430 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb PIQUERO, ALEX R. verfasserin aut AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. 2006 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2006|||||||||| HICKMAN, MATTHEW verfasserin aut In Criminology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927339 (DE-600)2066199-X 1745-9125 nnns volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 1999 2 0 |
| source |
In Criminology 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Criminology 37(1999), 2, Seite 0 volume:37 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Criminology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. @@aut@@ HICKMAN, MATTHEW @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1999-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927339 |
| id |
NLEJ242505430 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242505430</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707160110.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242505430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PIQUERO, ALEX R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2006</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2006||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HICKMAN, MATTHEW</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Criminology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">37(1999), 2, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927339</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2066199-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1745-9125</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1999</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">1999</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. |
| spellingShingle |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| authorStr |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927339 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1745-9125 |
| topic_title |
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| publisher |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Criminology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927339 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Criminology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927339 (DE-600)2066199-X |
| title |
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ242505430 |
| title_full |
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| author_sort |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. |
| journal |
Criminology |
| journalStr |
Criminology |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1999 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. HICKMAN, MATTHEW |
| container_volume |
37 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
PIQUERO, ALEX R. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
an empirical test of tittle's control balance theory |
| title_auth |
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| abstract |
Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. |
| abstractGer |
Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
HICKMAN, MATTHEW |
| author2Str |
HICKMAN, MATTHEW |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927339 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T02:13:51.330Z |
| _version_ |
1803794022483886080 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242505430</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707160110.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242505430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PIQUERO, ALEX R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Classic statements of control theory propose that individuals who are controlled or bonded will be more likely to be deterred from deviance, while those who are not controlled or bonded will be more likely to turn to deviance. In a recent restatement of control theory, Tittle (1995) offers an alternative viewpoint. Though he agrees that a lack of control (a control deficit) can lead to repressive forms of deviance (predation, defiance, and submission), Tittle also asserts that overcontrol (a control surplus) may lead to autonomous types of deviance (exploitation, plunder, and decadence). Terming it control balance theory, Tittle argues that the amount of control to which one is subject relative to the amount of control one can exercise (i.e., the control ratio) affects not only the probability that one will engage in a deviant act, but also the specific form or type of deviance. In this article, we focus on one of the key hypotheses of control balance theory: an individual's control balance ratio predicts deviant behavior. We examine this hypothesis using two vignettes designed to investigate the repressive acts of predation and defiance. Segmented, nonlinear regression results yield mixed evidence in that both control surpluses and control deficits significantly predict predation and defiance. The theoretical implications of our results for control balance theory are discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2006</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2006||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HICKMAN, MATTHEW</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Criminology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">37(1999), 2, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927339</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2066199-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1745-9125</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1999</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00488.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">1999</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400304 |