Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century
Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Solomon, Jill [verfasserIn] Solomon, Aris [verfasserIn] Joseph, Nathan [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd ; 2000 |
---|
Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
---|
Reproduktion: |
2002 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Corporate governance - Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993, 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2000 ; number:3 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ242511392 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ242511392 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210707160202.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 120427s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1467-8683.00200 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ242511392 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Solomon, Jill |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA |b Blackwell Publishers Ltd |c 2000 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. | ||
533 | |d 2002 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2002|||||||||| | ||
700 | 1 | |a Solomon, Aris |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Joseph, Nathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Norton, Simon |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Corporate governance |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 |g 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ24392593X |w (DE-600)2062255-7 |x 1467-8683 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2000 |g number:3 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2000 |e 3 |h 0 |
author_variant |
j s js a s as n j nj |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14678683:2000----::ntttoaivsosiwocroaeoenneeomoiyeomn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2000 |
publishDate |
2000 |
allfields |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 doi (DE-627)NLEJ242511392 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Solomon, Jill verfasserin aut Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Solomon, Aris verfasserin aut Joseph, Nathan verfasserin aut Norton, Simon oth In Corporate governance Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392593X (DE-600)2062255-7 1467-8683 nnns volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 3 0 |
spelling |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 doi (DE-627)NLEJ242511392 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Solomon, Jill verfasserin aut Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Solomon, Aris verfasserin aut Joseph, Nathan verfasserin aut Norton, Simon oth In Corporate governance Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392593X (DE-600)2062255-7 1467-8683 nnns volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 3 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 doi (DE-627)NLEJ242511392 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Solomon, Jill verfasserin aut Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Solomon, Aris verfasserin aut Joseph, Nathan verfasserin aut Norton, Simon oth In Corporate governance Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392593X (DE-600)2062255-7 1467-8683 nnns volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 3 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 doi (DE-627)NLEJ242511392 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Solomon, Jill verfasserin aut Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Solomon, Aris verfasserin aut Joseph, Nathan verfasserin aut Norton, Simon oth In Corporate governance Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392593X (DE-600)2062255-7 1467-8683 nnns volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 3 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 doi (DE-627)NLEJ242511392 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Solomon, Jill verfasserin aut Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2000 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Solomon, Aris verfasserin aut Joseph, Nathan verfasserin aut Norton, Simon oth In Corporate governance Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392593X (DE-600)2062255-7 1467-8683 nnns volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 8 2000 3 0 |
source |
In Corporate governance 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
In Corporate governance 8(2000), 3, Seite 0 volume:8 year:2000 number:3 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Corporate governance |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Solomon, Jill @@aut@@ Solomon, Aris @@aut@@ Joseph, Nathan @@aut@@ Norton, Simon @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2000-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ24392593X |
id |
NLEJ242511392 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242511392</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707160202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/1467-8683.00200</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242511392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solomon, Jill</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishers Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2002</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2002||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solomon, Aris</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Joseph, Nathan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Norton, Simon</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Corporate governance</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2000), 3, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24392593X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2062255-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1467-8683</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
author |
Solomon, Jill |
spellingShingle |
Solomon, Jill Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
authorStr |
Solomon, Jill |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ24392593X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
NL |
publishPlace |
Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1467-8683 |
topic_title |
Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
publisher |
Blackwell Publishers Ltd |
publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishers Ltd |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
s n sn |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Corporate governance |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ24392593X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Corporate governance |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ24392593X (DE-600)2062255-7 |
title |
Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ242511392 |
title_full |
Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
author_sort |
Solomon, Jill |
journal |
Corporate governance |
journalStr |
Corporate governance |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2000 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Solomon, Jill Solomon, Aris Joseph, Nathan |
container_volume |
8 |
physical |
Online-Ressource |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Solomon, Jill |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
institutional investors’ views on corporate governance reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
title_auth |
Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
abstract |
Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. |
abstractGer |
Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Solomon, Aris Joseph, Nathan Norton, Simon |
author2Str |
Solomon, Aris Joseph, Nathan Norton, Simon |
ppnlink |
NLEJ24392593X |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1111/1467-8683.00200 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T02:14:53.383Z |
_version_ |
1803794087550124032 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242511392</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707160202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/1467-8683.00200</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242511392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solomon, Jill</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Institutional Investors’ Views on Corporate Governance Reform: policy recommendations for the 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, Uk and Boston, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishers Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Growing interest in UK corporate governance has engendered research on specific issues of corporate governance reform. However, there seems to be little research on the more general impact of recent reforms in corporate governance. In this paper we employ an extensive postal questionnaire survey to investigate: (i) UK institutional investors’ general attitudes towards recent corporate governance reforms; (ii) whether UK institutional investors consider specific corporate governance initiatives to be of equal importance, and; (iii) whether all institutional investors represent a homogeneous group with respect to corporate governance reform. The empirical results indicate that institutional investors: (i) have generally welcomed the recent reforms; (ii) do not consider that specific corporate governance initiatives are equally important but attach more relevance to initiatives aimed at monitoring the principal/agent problem, and; (iii) may be treated as a homogeneous group, except in relation to voting policy, where pension funds appear more pro-active in their approach than other groups.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2002</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2002||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Solomon, Aris</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Joseph, Nathan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Norton, Simon</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Corporate governance</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2000), 3, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24392593X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2062255-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1467-8683</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00200</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399496 |