Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation
Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different tita...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sader, Márcia Soares [verfasserIn] Balduino, Alex [verfasserIn] De Almeida Soares, Glória [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Munksgaard International Publishers ; 2005 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
---|
Reproduktion: |
2005 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Clinical oral implants research - Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990, 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2005 ; number:6 ; pages:0 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ242554954 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ242554954 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210707160815.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 120427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ242554954 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sader, Márcia Soares |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Munksgaard International Publishers |c 2005 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. | ||
533 | |d 2005 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2005|||||||||| | ||
650 | 4 | |a cell–biomaterial interaction | |
700 | 1 | |a Balduino, Alex |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a De Almeida Soares, Glória |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Borojevic, Radovan |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Clinical oral implants research |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990 |g 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ24392626X |w (DE-600)2027104-9 |x 1600-0501 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2005 |g number:6 |g pages:0 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2005 |e 6 |h 0 |
author_variant |
m s s ms mss a b ab a s g d asg asgd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:16000501:2005----::fetfhedsictetetottnusraensebattahetrl |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2005 |
publishDate |
2005 |
allfields |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242554954 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sader, Márcia Soares verfasserin aut Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| cell–biomaterial interaction Balduino, Alex verfasserin aut De Almeida Soares, Glória verfasserin aut Borojevic, Radovan oth In Clinical oral implants research Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392626X (DE-600)2027104-9 1600-0501 nnns volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 16 2005 6 0 |
spelling |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242554954 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sader, Márcia Soares verfasserin aut Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| cell–biomaterial interaction Balduino, Alex verfasserin aut De Almeida Soares, Glória verfasserin aut Borojevic, Radovan oth In Clinical oral implants research Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392626X (DE-600)2027104-9 1600-0501 nnns volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 16 2005 6 0 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242554954 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sader, Márcia Soares verfasserin aut Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| cell–biomaterial interaction Balduino, Alex verfasserin aut De Almeida Soares, Glória verfasserin aut Borojevic, Radovan oth In Clinical oral implants research Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392626X (DE-600)2027104-9 1600-0501 nnns volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 16 2005 6 0 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242554954 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sader, Márcia Soares verfasserin aut Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| cell–biomaterial interaction Balduino, Alex verfasserin aut De Almeida Soares, Glória verfasserin aut Borojevic, Radovan oth In Clinical oral implants research Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392626X (DE-600)2027104-9 1600-0501 nnns volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 16 2005 6 0 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242554954 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sader, Márcia Soares verfasserin aut Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| cell–biomaterial interaction Balduino, Alex verfasserin aut De Almeida Soares, Glória verfasserin aut Borojevic, Radovan oth In Clinical oral implants research Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ24392626X (DE-600)2027104-9 1600-0501 nnns volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 16 2005 6 0 |
source |
In Clinical oral implants research 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 |
sourceStr |
In Clinical oral implants research 16(2005), 6, Seite 0 volume:16 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
cell–biomaterial interaction |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Clinical oral implants research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sader, Márcia Soares @@aut@@ Balduino, Alex @@aut@@ De Almeida Soares, Glória @@aut@@ Borojevic, Radovan @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ24392626X |
id |
NLEJ242554954 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242554954</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707160815.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242554954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sader, Márcia Soares</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Munksgaard International Publishers</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2005</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2005||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cell–biomaterial interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balduino, Alex</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Almeida Soares, Glória</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Borojevic, Radovan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical oral implants research</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2005), 6, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24392626X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2027104-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1600-0501</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
author |
Sader, Márcia Soares |
spellingShingle |
Sader, Márcia Soares misc cell–biomaterial interaction Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
authorStr |
Sader, Márcia Soares |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ24392626X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
NL |
publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1600-0501 |
topic_title |
Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation cell–biomaterial interaction |
publisher |
Munksgaard International Publishers |
publisherStr |
Munksgaard International Publishers |
topic |
misc cell–biomaterial interaction |
topic_unstemmed |
misc cell–biomaterial interaction |
topic_browse |
misc cell–biomaterial interaction |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
r b rb |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical oral implants research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ24392626X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical oral implants research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ24392626X (DE-600)2027104-9 |
title |
Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ242554954 |
title_full |
Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
author_sort |
Sader, Márcia Soares |
journal |
Clinical oral implants research |
journalStr |
Clinical oral implants research |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2005 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
0 |
author_browse |
Sader, Márcia Soares Balduino, Alex De Almeida Soares, Glória |
container_volume |
16 |
physical |
Online-Ressource |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sader, Márcia Soares |
doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
title_auth |
Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
abstract |
Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. |
abstractGer |
Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Balduino, Alex De Almeida Soares, Glória Borojevic, Radovan |
author2Str |
Balduino, Alex De Almeida Soares, Glória Borojevic, Radovan |
ppnlink |
NLEJ24392626X |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth |
doi_str |
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x |
up_date |
2024-07-06T02:22:45.167Z |
_version_ |
1803794582252552192 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242554954</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707160815.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242554954</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sader, Márcia Soares</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Munksgaard International Publishers</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: Cell–titanium interactions are crucial to the clinical success of bone and dental implants. The physico-chemical characteristics of the substrates surface influence osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity as well. The osteoblast behavior was analyzed on three different titanium surfaces: ground with an abrasive 600 grit SiC paper, blasted with alumina particles (65 μm diameter) and alumina blasted followed by a double chemical etch (4% HF+4% HF/8% H2O2). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and profilometry showed distinct microtopographies. Ground samples showed parallel-groove orientation. The Al2O3-blasted surface presented the roughest microtopography with aluminum-rich particles incrusted in the titanium surface. Osteoblasts cells from femora of Balb/c mice were seeded onto the substrates tested. Cell morphology and initial attachment were evaluated by SEM. Osteoblasts adhered to and spread on all samples tested. However, on rough surfaces, osteoblasts did not spread completely and acquired a polygonal morphology. Besides, the cell proliferation rate was diminished at the beginning of incubation on rough surfaces. Our results suggest a delay, rather than an impairment, in osteoblast viability and alkaline phosphatase activity when cells are cultured on rough surfaces, inducing a distinct osteoblast phenotype, rather than blocking its activity. At least in the culture conditions used in this work, alumina particles did not affect osteoblast behavior.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2005</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2005||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cell–biomaterial interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balduino, Alex</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Almeida Soares, Glória</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Borojevic, Radovan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical oral implants research</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2005), 6, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24392626X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2027104-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1600-0501</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01135.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3998175 |