Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study
Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in th...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Dixon, Simon [verfasserIn] Shackley, Phil [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd ; 1999 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2007 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Community dentistry and oral epidemiology - Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973, 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:27 ; year:1999 ; number:2 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ242632955 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ242632955 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707161921.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ242632955 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dixon, Simon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Blackwell Publishing Ltd |c 1999 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. | ||
| 533 | |d 2007 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2007|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cost-benefit analysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shackley, Phil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Community dentistry and oral epidemiology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973 |g 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927207 |w (DE-600)2027101-3 |x 1600-0528 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:1999 |g number:2 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 27 |j 1999 |e 2 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
s d sd p s ps |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:16000528:1999----::siaighbnftocmuiyaefurdtouighwligesoat |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1999 |
| publishDate |
1999 |
| allfields |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242632955 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Dixon, Simon verfasserin aut Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| cost-benefit analysis Shackley, Phil verfasserin aut In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927207 (DE-600)2027101-3 1600-0528 nnns volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 1999 2 0 |
| spelling |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242632955 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Dixon, Simon verfasserin aut Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| cost-benefit analysis Shackley, Phil verfasserin aut In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927207 (DE-600)2027101-3 1600-0528 nnns volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 1999 2 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242632955 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Dixon, Simon verfasserin aut Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| cost-benefit analysis Shackley, Phil verfasserin aut In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927207 (DE-600)2027101-3 1600-0528 nnns volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 1999 2 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242632955 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Dixon, Simon verfasserin aut Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| cost-benefit analysis Shackley, Phil verfasserin aut In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927207 (DE-600)2027101-3 1600-0528 nnns volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 1999 2 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242632955 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Dixon, Simon verfasserin aut Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. 2007 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2007|||||||||| cost-benefit analysis Shackley, Phil verfasserin aut In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927207 (DE-600)2027101-3 1600-0528 nnns volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 1999 2 0 |
| source |
In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 27(1999), 2, Seite 0 volume:27 year:1999 number:2 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
cost-benefit analysis |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Dixon, Simon @@aut@@ Shackley, Phil @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1999-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927207 |
| id |
NLEJ242632955 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242632955</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707161921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242632955</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dixon, Simon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2007</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2007||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cost-benefit analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shackley, Phil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Community dentistry and oral epidemiology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">27(1999), 2, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927207</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2027101-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1600-0528</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1999</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">1999</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
Dixon, Simon |
| spellingShingle |
Dixon, Simon misc cost-benefit analysis Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| authorStr |
Dixon, Simon |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927207 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1600-0528 |
| topic_title |
Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study cost-benefit analysis |
| publisher |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| topic |
misc cost-benefit analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc cost-benefit analysis |
| topic_browse |
misc cost-benefit analysis |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927207 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927207 (DE-600)2027101-3 |
| title |
Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ242632955 |
| title_full |
Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| author_sort |
Dixon, Simon |
| journal |
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology |
| journalStr |
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1999 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Dixon, Simon Shackley, Phil |
| container_volume |
27 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Dixon, Simon |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| title_auth |
Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| abstract |
Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. |
| abstractGer |
Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Shackley, Phil |
| author2Str |
Shackley, Phil |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927207 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T02:40:21.115Z |
| _version_ |
1803795689495330816 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242632955</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707161921.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242632955</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dixon, Simon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: To estimate the health and non-health effects of fluoridation on well-being using the willingness-to-pay technique. Methods: A pilot study of 100 people was undertaken in which the willingness-to-pay technique was used to estimate the welfare effects of community water fluoridation in the city of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom. In view of the pilot nature of the study, it was decided to use quota sampling based on age and sex rather than random sampling. Reasons for respondents' answers and their previous knowledge of fluoridation were also noted. Results: Sixty-two percent of respondents were in favour of fluoridation, 31% were opposed, and 7% were unsure. Thirty-one respondents re-fused to answer the willingness-to-pay questions. The mean willingness to pay for those in favour of fluoridation was less than that for those opposed to fluoridation. The main reasons given for opposing fluoridation were its impact on freedom of choice and the desire for pure water. Nineteen percent of the sample held incorrect information on the effects of fluoridation. Conclusions: The study illustrates how a simple referendum can miss important information regarding the intensity of individuals' preferences. An important aspect of the willingness-to-pay technique is its ability to identify ‘losers’ and quantify their welfare loss. This issue has been ignored by all previous economic evaluations of fluoridation. Further investigation is required to replicate this work on a larger sample of individuals, and to develop the willingness-to-pay technique.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2007</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2007||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cost-benefit analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shackley, Phil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Community dentistry and oral epidemiology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Blackwell, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">27(1999), 2, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927207</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2027101-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1600-0528</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1999</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02001.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">1999</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398802 |