Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calcul...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
RUGGERA, LORENZO [verfasserIn] BELTRAMI, PAOLO [verfasserIn] BALLARIO, RICCARDO [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty ; 2005 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2005 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: International journal of urology - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997, 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2005 ; number:6 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ242677584 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ242677584 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707162531.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ242677584 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a RUGGERA, LORENZO |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| 264 | 1 | |a Melbourne, Australia |b Blackwell Science Pty |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. | ||
| 533 | |d 2005 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2005|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a BELTRAMI, PAOLO |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a BALLARIO, RICCARDO |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a CAVALLERI, STEFANO |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a ARTIBANI, WALTER |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal of urology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997 |g 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243925654 |w (DE-600)2009793-1 |x 1442-2042 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2005 |g number:6 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 2005 |e 6 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
l r lr p b pb r b rb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14422042:2005----::matfntmclilclcatpgahiteramnornloeclcstnsihx |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2005 |
| publishDate |
2005 |
| allfields |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242677584 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb RUGGERA, LORENZO verfasserin aut Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy BELTRAMI, PAOLO verfasserin aut BALLARIO, RICCARDO verfasserin aut CAVALLERI, STEFANO oth CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA oth ARTIBANI, WALTER oth In International journal of urology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925654 (DE-600)2009793-1 1442-2042 nnns volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 2005 6 0 |
| spelling |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242677584 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb RUGGERA, LORENZO verfasserin aut Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy BELTRAMI, PAOLO verfasserin aut BALLARIO, RICCARDO verfasserin aut CAVALLERI, STEFANO oth CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA oth ARTIBANI, WALTER oth In International journal of urology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925654 (DE-600)2009793-1 1442-2042 nnns volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 2005 6 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242677584 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb RUGGERA, LORENZO verfasserin aut Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy BELTRAMI, PAOLO verfasserin aut BALLARIO, RICCARDO verfasserin aut CAVALLERI, STEFANO oth CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA oth ARTIBANI, WALTER oth In International journal of urology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925654 (DE-600)2009793-1 1442-2042 nnns volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 2005 6 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242677584 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb RUGGERA, LORENZO verfasserin aut Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy BELTRAMI, PAOLO verfasserin aut BALLARIO, RICCARDO verfasserin aut CAVALLERI, STEFANO oth CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA oth ARTIBANI, WALTER oth In International journal of urology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925654 (DE-600)2009793-1 1442-2042 nnns volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 2005 6 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ242677584 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb RUGGERA, LORENZO verfasserin aut Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Science Pty 2005 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. 2005 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2005|||||||||| extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy BELTRAMI, PAOLO verfasserin aut BALLARIO, RICCARDO verfasserin aut CAVALLERI, STEFANO oth CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA oth ARTIBANI, WALTER oth In International journal of urology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925654 (DE-600)2009793-1 1442-2042 nnns volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 12 2005 6 0 |
| source |
In International journal of urology 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In International journal of urology 12(2005), 6, Seite 0 volume:12 year:2005 number:6 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of urology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
RUGGERA, LORENZO @@aut@@ BELTRAMI, PAOLO @@aut@@ BALLARIO, RICCARDO @@aut@@ CAVALLERI, STEFANO @@oth@@ CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA @@oth@@ ARTIBANI, WALTER @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243925654 |
| id |
NLEJ242677584 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242677584</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707162531.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242677584</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RUGGERA, LORENZO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Melbourne, Australia</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Pty</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2005</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2005||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BELTRAMI, PAOLO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BALLARIO, RICCARDO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CAVALLERI, STEFANO</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ARTIBANI, WALTER</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of urology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2005), 6, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243925654</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009793-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1442-2042</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
RUGGERA, LORENZO |
| spellingShingle |
RUGGERA, LORENZO misc extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| authorStr |
RUGGERA, LORENZO |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243925654 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Melbourne, Australia |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1442-2042 |
| topic_title |
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| publisher |
Blackwell Science Pty |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Science Pty |
| topic |
misc extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| topic_browse |
misc extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s c sc l c lc w a wa |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of urology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243925654 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of urology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243925654 (DE-600)2009793-1 |
| title |
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ242677584 |
| title_full |
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| author_sort |
RUGGERA, LORENZO |
| journal |
International journal of urology |
| journalStr |
International journal of urology |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2005 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
RUGGERA, LORENZO BELTRAMI, PAOLO BALLARIO, RICCARDO |
| container_volume |
12 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
RUGGERA, LORENZO |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| title_auth |
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| abstract |
Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
6 |
| title_short |
Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
BELTRAMI, PAOLO BALLARIO, RICCARDO CAVALLERI, STEFANO CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA ARTIBANI, WALTER |
| author2Str |
BELTRAMI, PAOLO BALLARIO, RICCARDO CAVALLERI, STEFANO CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA ARTIBANI, WALTER |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243925654 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T02:49:17.329Z |
| _version_ |
1803796251753316352 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ242677584</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707162531.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ242677584</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RUGGERA, LORENZO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Melbourne, Australia</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Pty</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Aim: There is wide consensus that the lowest success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is in the complete clearance of renal stones located in the lower calyces. We assess the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for lower pole renal calculi to determine the relationship between the spatial anatomy of lower pole and the outcome of ESWL.Methods: We evaluated 107 patients who were treated for solitary lower pole renal stones less than 20 mm in diameter with ESWL. The spatial anatomy of the lower pole, as defined by the lower infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length and infundibular width, was measured by preoperative intravenous pyelography, while the stone location and size were determined by using abdominal plain X-ray. All patients were followed up at 1 and 3 months with abdominal plain X-ray and ultrasonography.Results: Only 62 patients (58%) became stone free, while 45 (42%) retained residual fragments. A small lower infundibulopelvic angle, a long infundibular length and a tight infundibular width are unfavorable for stone clearance after ESWL.Conclusions: ESWL is the treatment of choice for most renal and ureteral stones. However, stone clearance from the lower pole following ESWL is poor and significantly affected by the inferior pole collecting system anatomy. Therefore, we believe it is important to evaluate these anatomical factors when deciding on the best treatment for lower pole renal calculi.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2005</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2005||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BELTRAMI, PAOLO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BALLARIO, RICCARDO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CAVALLERI, STEFANO</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CAZZOLETTI, LUCIA</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ARTIBANI, WALTER</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of urology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2005), 6, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243925654</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009793-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1442-2042</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01101.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4020147 |