Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro
This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the si...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Gernhardt, C. R. [verfasserIn] Kielbassa, A. M. [verfasserIn] Hahn, P. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd ; 2001 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2008 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of oral rehabilitation - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974, 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2001 ; number:9 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ243049102 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ243049102 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707171810.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ243049102 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gernhardt, C. R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford UK |b Blackwell Science Ltd |c 2001 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. | ||
| 533 | |d 2008 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2008|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a bond strength | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kielbassa, A. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hahn, P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schaller, H.-G. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of oral rehabilitation |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 |g 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927177 |w (DE-600)2007587-X |x 1365-2842 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2001 |g number:9 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2001 |e 9 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
c r g cr crg a m k am amk p h ph |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13652842:2001----::eslbnsrntsforifrndniahsvsnraitdnnnra |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2001 |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| allfields |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243049102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gernhardt, C. R. verfasserin aut Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. 2008 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2008|||||||||| bond strength Kielbassa, A. M. verfasserin aut Hahn, P. verfasserin aut Schaller, H.-G. oth In Journal of oral rehabilitation Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927177 (DE-600)2007587-X 1365-2842 nnns volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2001 9 0 |
| spelling |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243049102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gernhardt, C. R. verfasserin aut Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. 2008 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2008|||||||||| bond strength Kielbassa, A. M. verfasserin aut Hahn, P. verfasserin aut Schaller, H.-G. oth In Journal of oral rehabilitation Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927177 (DE-600)2007587-X 1365-2842 nnns volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2001 9 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243049102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gernhardt, C. R. verfasserin aut Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. 2008 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2008|||||||||| bond strength Kielbassa, A. M. verfasserin aut Hahn, P. verfasserin aut Schaller, H.-G. oth In Journal of oral rehabilitation Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927177 (DE-600)2007587-X 1365-2842 nnns volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2001 9 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243049102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gernhardt, C. R. verfasserin aut Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. 2008 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2008|||||||||| bond strength Kielbassa, A. M. verfasserin aut Hahn, P. verfasserin aut Schaller, H.-G. oth In Journal of oral rehabilitation Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927177 (DE-600)2007587-X 1365-2842 nnns volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2001 9 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243049102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gernhardt, C. R. verfasserin aut Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. 2008 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2008|||||||||| bond strength Kielbassa, A. M. verfasserin aut Hahn, P. verfasserin aut Schaller, H.-G. oth In Journal of oral rehabilitation Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927177 (DE-600)2007587-X 1365-2842 nnns volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 28 2001 9 0 |
| source |
In Journal of oral rehabilitation 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of oral rehabilitation 28(2001), 9, Seite 0 volume:28 year:2001 number:9 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
bond strength |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gernhardt, C. R. @@aut@@ Kielbassa, A. M. @@aut@@ Hahn, P. @@aut@@ Schaller, H.-G. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2001-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927177 |
| id |
NLEJ243049102 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243049102</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707171810.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243049102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gernhardt, C. R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2008</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2008||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bond strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kielbassa, A. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hahn, P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaller, H.-G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of oral rehabilitation</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2001), 9, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2007587-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1365-2842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2001</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2001</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
Gernhardt, C. R. |
| spellingShingle |
Gernhardt, C. R. misc bond strength Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| authorStr |
Gernhardt, C. R. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927177 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford UK |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1365-2842 |
| topic_title |
Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro bond strength |
| publisher |
Blackwell Science Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Science Ltd |
| topic |
misc bond strength |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc bond strength |
| topic_browse |
misc bond strength |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
h g s hgs |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927177 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927177 (DE-600)2007587-X |
| title |
Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ243049102 |
| title_full |
Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| author_sort |
Gernhardt, C. R. |
| journal |
Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| journalStr |
Journal of oral rehabilitation |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2001 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Gernhardt, C. R. Kielbassa, A. M. Hahn, P. |
| container_volume |
28 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Gernhardt, C. R. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| title_auth |
Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| abstract |
This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. |
| abstractGer |
This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
9 |
| title_short |
Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Kielbassa, A. M. Hahn, P. Schaller, H.-G. |
| author2Str |
Kielbassa, A. M. Hahn, P. Schaller, H.-G. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927177 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T04:06:32.020Z |
| _version_ |
1803801111579066368 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243049102</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707171810.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243049102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gernhardt, C. R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tensile bond strengths of four different dentin adhesives on irradiated and non-irradiated human dentin in vitro</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study evaluated the influence of irradiation on dentin bond strength. Sixty irradiated and 60 non-irradiated human third molars were used. The irradiation dose of 60 Gy was fractionally applied over 6 weeks (2 Gy day−1, 5 days week−1). All teeth were prepared in a special manner allowing the simulation of intra-pulpal pressure and dentin perfusion. Dentin specimens with a thickness of 2·0 mm were obtained under standardized conditions. The specimens were randomly assigned to four experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of four different dentin bonding agents (Scotchbond™ 1, Solobond Plus®, Prime&Bond™ 2·1 and Syntac®) was evaluated using an Instron Universal testing machine. Pairwise comparison did not show any significant differences between the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. The influence of the different dentin adhesives was significant (P=0·0001; ANOVA). Compared with Solobond Plus® and Prime&Bond™ 2·1, the use of Scotchbond™ 1 resulted in a significantly higher tensile bond strength in non-irradiated specimen (P< 0·05; closed test procedure based on Kruskal–Wallis test). Within the limitations of an in vitro study, it can be concluded that adhesive restoration procedures can be successfully used in patients irradiated for cancer of the head and neck.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2008</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2008||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bond strength</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kielbassa, A. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hahn, P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaller, H.-G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of oral rehabilitation</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1974</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2001), 9, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2007587-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1365-2842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2001</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00758.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2001</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4002886 |