Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives
The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental br...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Horne, Michael [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd ; 2002 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2002 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: The journal of analytical psychology - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955, 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:47 ; year:2002 ; number:4 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ243094493 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ243094493 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707172420.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/1465-5922.00350 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ243094493 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Horne, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK and Boston, USA |b Blackwell Publishers Ltd |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. | ||
| 533 | |d 2002 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2002|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Aristotle | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t The journal of analytical psychology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955 |g 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927606 |w (DE-600)2021843-6 |x 1468-5922 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2002 |g number:4 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 47 |j 2002 |e 4 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
m h mh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14685922:2002----::rsolsnoeeiahoyfniiutowihnertshcascln |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2002 |
| publishDate |
2002 |
| allfields |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 doi (DE-627)NLEJ243094493 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Horne, Michael verfasserin aut Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Aristotle In The journal of analytical psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927606 (DE-600)2021843-6 1468-5922 nnns volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 47 2002 4 0 |
| spelling |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 doi (DE-627)NLEJ243094493 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Horne, Michael verfasserin aut Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Aristotle In The journal of analytical psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927606 (DE-600)2021843-6 1468-5922 nnns volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 47 2002 4 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 doi (DE-627)NLEJ243094493 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Horne, Michael verfasserin aut Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Aristotle In The journal of analytical psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927606 (DE-600)2021843-6 1468-5922 nnns volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 47 2002 4 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 doi (DE-627)NLEJ243094493 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Horne, Michael verfasserin aut Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Aristotle In The journal of analytical psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927606 (DE-600)2021843-6 1468-5922 nnns volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 47 2002 4 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 doi (DE-627)NLEJ243094493 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Horne, Michael verfasserin aut Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. 2002 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2002|||||||||| Aristotle In The journal of analytical psychology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927606 (DE-600)2021843-6 1468-5922 nnns volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 47 2002 4 0 |
| source |
In The journal of analytical psychology 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In The journal of analytical psychology 47(2002), 4, Seite 0 volume:47 year:2002 number:4 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Aristotle |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The journal of analytical psychology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Horne, Michael @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2002-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927606 |
| id |
NLEJ243094493 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243094493</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707172420.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/1465-5922.00350</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243094493</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horne, Michael</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishers Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2002</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2002||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of analytical psychology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2002), 4, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927606</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2021843-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1468-5922</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
Horne, Michael |
| spellingShingle |
Horne, Michael misc Aristotle Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| authorStr |
Horne, Michael |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927606 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford, UK and Boston, USA |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1468-5922 |
| topic_title |
Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives Aristotle |
| publisher |
Blackwell Publishers Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Publishers Ltd |
| topic |
misc Aristotle |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Aristotle |
| topic_browse |
misc Aristotle |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The journal of analytical psychology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927606 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The journal of analytical psychology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927606 (DE-600)2021843-6 |
| title |
Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ243094493 |
| title_full |
Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| author_sort |
Horne, Michael |
| journal |
The journal of analytical psychology |
| journalStr |
The journal of analytical psychology |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2002 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Horne, Michael |
| container_volume |
47 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Horne, Michael |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 |
| title_sort |
aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| title_auth |
Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| abstract |
The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. |
| abstractGer |
The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927606 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1111/1465-5922.00350 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T04:15:34.991Z |
| _version_ |
1803801680928571392 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243094493</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707172420.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1111/1465-5922.00350</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243094493</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horne, Michael</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aristotle’s ontogenesis: a theory of individuation which integrates the classical and developmental perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Publishers Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The effects of the classical/developmental split in analytical psychology are described. No underlying issues explaining the nature of the split have been clearly enunciated. The schools can, however, be distinguished by their differing epistemologies. These are the hermeneutic and transcendental branches of phenomenology. The use of these epistemologies leads their proponents to either an immanent or transcendent concept of the divine, respectively.The theoretical break between Freud and Jung can, in part, be attributed to their espousal of determinism and teleology, respectively. This conflict has been continued in analytical psychology with the developmentalists most often advocating determinism, and the classicists usually championing teleology. The dissimilar causal theories lead to different concepts of the nature of individuation.Aristotle’s fourfold theory of causality, of which determinism and teleology are two categories, can be seen to be an ontogenic theory rather than a classification of causal influences. Applying his theory to the process of individuation provides an ontogenesis that more accurately describes the process itself, and unifies the developmental and classical theories.Intimations of this formulation in Jung’s work are described. More explicit conceptions of this idea in the work of two contemporary analytical psychologists and that of Wilfred Bion are also presented.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2002</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2002||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The journal of analytical psychology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1955</subfield><subfield code="g">47(2002), 4, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927606</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2021843-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1468-5922</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:47</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1465-5922.00350</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">47</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3997183 |