Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct
Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
O'Cathain, Alicia - BSc MSc MA [verfasserIn] Sampson, Fiona C. - BA MSc [verfasserIn] Munro, James F. - BA MA BS MRCP MFPH [verfasserIn] Thomas, Kate J. - BA MA Nicholl, Jon P. - BA MSc CStat FFPH |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd ; 2004 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2004 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of advanced nursing - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976, 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:45 ; year:2004 ; number:3 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ243401930 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ243401930 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707180619.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ243401930 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a O'Cathain, Alicia |c BSc MSc MA |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford, UK |b Blackwell Science Ltd |c 2004 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. | ||
| 533 | |d 2004 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2004|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a NHS Direct | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sampson, Fiona C. |c BA MSc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Munro, James F. |c BA MA BS MRCP MFPH |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thomas, Kate J. |c BA MA |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nicholl, Jon P. |c BA MSc CStat FFPH |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of advanced nursing |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 |g 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 |w (DE-600)2009963-0 |x 1365-2648 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2004 |g number:3 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 45 |j 2004 |e 3 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
a o ao f c s fc fcs j f m jf jfm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13652648:2004----::ussiwouigoptrzdeiinuprsf |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2004 |
| publishDate |
2004 |
| allfields |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243401930 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA verfasserin aut Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2004 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. 2004 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2004|||||||||| NHS Direct Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc verfasserin aut Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH verfasserin aut Thomas, Kate J. BA MA oth Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH oth In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2004 3 0 |
| spelling |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243401930 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA verfasserin aut Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2004 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. 2004 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2004|||||||||| NHS Direct Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc verfasserin aut Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH verfasserin aut Thomas, Kate J. BA MA oth Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH oth In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2004 3 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243401930 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA verfasserin aut Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2004 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. 2004 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2004|||||||||| NHS Direct Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc verfasserin aut Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH verfasserin aut Thomas, Kate J. BA MA oth Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH oth In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2004 3 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243401930 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA verfasserin aut Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2004 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. 2004 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2004|||||||||| NHS Direct Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc verfasserin aut Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH verfasserin aut Thomas, Kate J. BA MA oth Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH oth In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2004 3 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243401930 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA verfasserin aut Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2004 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. 2004 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2004|||||||||| NHS Direct Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc verfasserin aut Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH verfasserin aut Thomas, Kate J. BA MA oth Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH oth In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2004 3 0 |
| source |
In Journal of advanced nursing 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of advanced nursing 45(2004), 3, Seite 0 volume:45 year:2004 number:3 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
NHS Direct |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
O'Cathain, Alicia @@aut@@ Sampson, Fiona C. @@aut@@ Munro, James F. @@aut@@ Thomas, Kate J. @@oth@@ Nicholl, Jon P. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927088 |
| id |
NLEJ243401930 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243401930</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707180619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243401930</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O'Cathain, Alicia</subfield><subfield code="c">BSc MSc MA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2004</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2004||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NHS Direct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sampson, Fiona C.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MSc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Munro, James F.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MA BS MRCP MFPH</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomas, Kate J.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MA</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicholl, Jon P.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MSc CStat FFPH</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of advanced nursing</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">45(2004), 3, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927088</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009963-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1365-2648</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:45</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2004</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">45</subfield><subfield code="j">2004</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA |
| spellingShingle |
O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA misc NHS Direct Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct |
| authorStr |
O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927088 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford, UK |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1365-2648 |
| topic_title |
Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct NHS Direct |
| publisher |
Blackwell Science Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Science Ltd |
| topic |
misc NHS Direct |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc NHS Direct |
| topic_browse |
misc NHS Direct |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k j t kj kjt j p n jp jpn |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927088 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 |
| title |
Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ243401930 |
| title_full |
Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct |
| author_sort |
O'Cathain, Alicia BSc MSc MA |
| journal |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| journalStr |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2004 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
O'Cathain, Alicia Sampson, Fiona C. Munro, James F. |
| container_volume |
45 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
O'Cathain, Alicia |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in nhs direct |
| title_auth |
Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct |
| abstract |
Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. |
| abstractGer |
Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH Thomas, Kate J. BA MA Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH |
| author2Str |
Sampson, Fiona C. BA MSc Munro, James F. BA MA BS MRCP MFPH Thomas, Kate J. BA MA Nicholl, Jon P. BA MSc CStat FFPH |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927088 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:20:49.632Z |
| _version_ |
1803805785728221185 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243401930</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707180619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243401930</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O'Cathain, Alicia</subfield><subfield code="c">BSc MSc MA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nurses’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford, UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. Nurses working in NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone advice line in England, use computerized decision support software to recommend to callers the most appropriate service to contact, or to advise on self-care.Aims. To explore nurses’ views of their roles and the computerized decision support software in NHS Direct.Methods. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 NHS Direct nurses in 12 sites.Findings. Nurses described both the software and themselves as essential to the clinical decision-making process. The software acted as safety net, provider of consistency, and provider of script, and was relied upon more when nurses did not have clinical knowledge relevant to the call. The nurse handled problems not covered by the software, probed patients for the appropriate information to enter into the software, and interpreted software recommendations in the light of contextual information which the software was unable to use. Nurses described a dual process of decision-making, with the nurse as active decision maker looking for consensus with the software recommendation and ready to override recommendations made by the software if necessary. However, nurses’ accounts of the software as a guide, prompt or support did not fully acknowledge the power of the software, which they are required to use, and the recommendation of which they are required to follow under some management policies. Over time, the influence of nurse and software merges as nurses internalize the software script as their own knowledge, and navigate the software to produce recommendations that they feel are most appropriate.Conclusions. The nurse and the software have distinct roles in NHS Direct, although the effect of each on the clinical decision-making process may be difficult to determine in practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2004</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2004||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NHS Direct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sampson, Fiona C.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MSc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Munro, James F.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MA BS MRCP MFPH</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomas, Kate J.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MA</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicholl, Jon P.</subfield><subfield code="c">BA MSc CStat FFPH</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of advanced nursing</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">45(2004), 3, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927088</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009963-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1365-2648</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:45</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2004</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02894.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">45</subfield><subfield code="j">2004</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4001455 |