Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Sum...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Harbison, Jean - BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd ; 2001 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2001 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of advanced nursing - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976, 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:35 ; year:2001 ; number:1 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ243414013 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ243414013 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707180755.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ243414013 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Harbison, Jean |c BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford UK |b Blackwell Science Ltd |c 2001 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. | ||
| 533 | |d 2001 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2001|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a clinical decision making | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of advanced nursing |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 |g 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 |w (DE-600)2009963-0 |x 1365-2648 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2001 |g number:1 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 35 |j 2001 |e 1 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
j h jh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:13652648:2001----::lncleiinaignusntertclesetvsnte |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2001 |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| allfields |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243414013 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT verfasserin aut Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. 2001 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2001|||||||||| clinical decision making In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 35 2001 1 0 |
| spelling |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243414013 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT verfasserin aut Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. 2001 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2001|||||||||| clinical decision making In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 35 2001 1 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243414013 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT verfasserin aut Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. 2001 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2001|||||||||| clinical decision making In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 35 2001 1 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243414013 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT verfasserin aut Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. 2001 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2001|||||||||| clinical decision making In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 35 2001 1 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243414013 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT verfasserin aut Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 2001 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. 2001 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2001|||||||||| clinical decision making In Journal of advanced nursing Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 1365-2648 nnns volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 35 2001 1 0 |
| source |
In Journal of advanced nursing 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of advanced nursing 35(2001), 1, Seite 0 volume:35 year:2001 number:1 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
clinical decision making |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Harbison, Jean @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2001-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243927088 |
| id |
NLEJ243414013 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243414013</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707180755.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243414013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harbison, Jean</subfield><subfield code="c">BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2001</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2001||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of advanced nursing</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2001), 1, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927088</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009963-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1365-2648</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2001</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2001</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT |
| spellingShingle |
Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT misc clinical decision making Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| authorStr |
Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243927088 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Oxford UK |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1365-2648 |
| topic_title |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice clinical decision making |
| publisher |
Blackwell Science Ltd |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Science Ltd |
| topic |
misc clinical decision making |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc clinical decision making |
| topic_browse |
misc clinical decision making |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243927088 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243927088 (DE-600)2009963-0 |
| title |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ243414013 |
| title_full |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| author_sort |
Harbison, Jean BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT |
| journal |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| journalStr |
Journal of advanced nursing |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2001 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Harbison, Jean |
| container_volume |
35 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Harbison, Jean |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x |
| title_sort |
clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| title_auth |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| abstract |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. |
| abstractGer |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243927088 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T05:22:58.317Z |
| _version_ |
1803805920688340992 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243414013</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707180755.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243414013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harbison, Jean</subfield><subfield code="c">BSc MPhil RGN SCM RCNT RNT</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford UK</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Ltd</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice Aim of paper. This paper is a response to Thompson’s paper ‘A conceptual treadmill: the need for a middle ground in clinical decision making theory’ published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing in 1999. Summary of content. This author agrees with his main recommendations, which are to seek a middle ground in the current polarized debate over clinical decision making in nursing, and to draw upon Hammond’s Cognitive Continuum theory to do so. The theoretical background is sketched out, and the implications of these recommendations are analysed against this. It is argued that nurses now need to move the academic debate forward in such a way as to make serious impact on developing and improving practice. Cognitive continuum theory, in the way in which it focuses on practice, holds considerable potential to assist this move. Conclusion. Drawing on cognitive continuum theory necessarily leads to consequences which are not addressed in Thompson’s paper: namely a need to consider the quality of nursing decisions, and a willingness to consider approaches to decision making which have been neglected or criticised by nurses. These consequences are explored here, and the implications of adopting this approach for nurses are outlined.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2001</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2001||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of advanced nursing</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2001), 1, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243927088</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2009963-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1365-2648</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2001</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01816.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2001</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398568 |