Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land?
Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kleijn, David [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science Inc ; 2003 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
2003 ; Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Restoration ecology - Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993, 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2003 ; number:2 ; pages:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ243747357 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ243747357 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210707185208.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 120427s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ243747357 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kleijn, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? |
| 264 | 1 | |a Boston, MA, USA |b Blackwell Science Inc |c 2003 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. | ||
| 533 | |d 2003 |f Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |7 |2003|||||||||| | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a establishment | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Restoration ecology |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 |g 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ243925964 |w (DE-600)2020952-6 |x 1526-100X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2003 |g number:2 |g pages:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x |q text/html |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DJB | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 11 |j 2003 |e 2 |h 0 | ||
| author_variant |
d k dk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1526100X:2003----::aetbihethrceitcepanhpoclnztoscesfaeucsinlr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2003 |
| publishDate |
2003 |
| allfields |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243747357 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Kleijn, David verfasserin aut Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Science Inc 2003 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. 2003 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2003|||||||||| establishment In Restoration ecology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925964 (DE-600)2020952-6 1526-100X nnns volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 11 2003 2 0 |
| spelling |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243747357 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Kleijn, David verfasserin aut Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Science Inc 2003 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. 2003 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2003|||||||||| establishment In Restoration ecology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925964 (DE-600)2020952-6 1526-100X nnns volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 11 2003 2 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243747357 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Kleijn, David verfasserin aut Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Science Inc 2003 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. 2003 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2003|||||||||| establishment In Restoration ecology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925964 (DE-600)2020952-6 1526-100X nnns volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 11 2003 2 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243747357 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Kleijn, David verfasserin aut Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Science Inc 2003 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. 2003 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2003|||||||||| establishment In Restoration ecology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925964 (DE-600)2020952-6 1526-100X nnns volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 11 2003 2 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x doi (DE-627)NLEJ243747357 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Kleijn, David verfasserin aut Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Science Inc 2003 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. 2003 Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |2003|||||||||| establishment In Restoration ecology Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ243925964 (DE-600)2020952-6 1526-100X nnns volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x text/html Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 11 2003 2 0 |
| source |
In Restoration ecology 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Restoration ecology 11(2003), 2, Seite 0 volume:11 year:2003 number:2 pages:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
establishment |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Restoration ecology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kleijn, David @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ243925964 |
| id |
NLEJ243747357 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243747357</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707185208.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243747357</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleijn, David</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Boston, MA, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Inc</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2003</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2003||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">establishment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Restoration ecology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2003), 2, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243925964</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2020952-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1526-100X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005 |
| author |
Kleijn, David |
| spellingShingle |
Kleijn, David misc establishment Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? |
| authorStr |
Kleijn, David |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ243925964 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| publishPlace |
Boston, MA, USA |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1526-100X |
| topic_title |
Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? establishment |
| publisher |
Blackwell Science Inc |
| publisherStr |
Blackwell Science Inc |
| topic |
misc establishment |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc establishment |
| topic_browse |
misc establishment |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Restoration ecology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ243925964 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Restoration ecology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ243925964 (DE-600)2020952-6 |
| title |
Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ243747357 |
| title_full |
Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? |
| author_sort |
Kleijn, David |
| journal |
Restoration ecology |
| journalStr |
Restoration ecology |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2003 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
0 |
| author_browse |
Kleijn, David |
| container_volume |
11 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kleijn, David |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x |
| title_sort |
can establishment characteristics explain the poor colonization success of late successional grassland species on ex-arable land? |
| title_auth |
Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? |
| abstract |
Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DJB GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land? |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ243925964 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T06:24:57.578Z |
| _version_ |
1803809820592046080 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ243747357</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210707185208.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120427s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ243747357</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kleijn, David</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Can Establishment Characteristics Explain the Poor Colonization Success of Late Successional Grassland Species on Ex-Arable Land?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Boston, MA, USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Blackwell Science Inc</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Many grassland restoration projects on former arable land face problems because early successional grassland species establish vigorously and persistently but late successional grassland species fail to establish. Differences in establishment characteristics of early and late successional species might provide an explanation for the failure of many late successional species to colonize grasslands on ex-arable land. I examined whether early and late successional species had different establishment rates in the initial years of a grassland succession, whether a specific establishment stage (seedling emergence, mortality or growth) could be identified as the key process controlling establishment, and what management would enhance the establishment of late successional grassland species. Seeds of three early and three late successional species were sown separately in ex-arable plots with bare soil, 1-year-old vegetation, and 2-year-old vegetation. Emergence, mortality, and seedling growth were monitored for 1 year. Early successional species established successfully in the bare soil plots but failed to establish in plots with 1- and 2-year-old vegetation. Late successional species showed either lower establishment rates in the younger succession stages or decreased establishment with succession that nevertheless resulted in significant establishment in the oldest plots. Seedling emergence proved to be the key factor determining the establishment pattern of early and late successional species. In absolute numbers, emergence of late successional species was, however, similar or higher than that of early successional species, even in the earliest succession stage. The poor establishment of late successional species on former arable land could therefore not be explained solely by differences in establishment characteristics between early and late successional grassland species. Competitive processes between early and late successional species later in the life cycle probably play an important role. The results do point out that establishment of late successional species can be promoted by creating vegetative cover from the start of the restoration effort.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">2003</subfield><subfield code="f">Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005</subfield><subfield code="7">|2003||||||||||</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">establishment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Restoration ecology</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2003), 2, Seite 0</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ243925964</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2020952-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1526-100X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2003</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00015.x</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DJB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2003</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3985004 |