Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects
This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decisio...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus [verfasserIn] Vinogradova, Irina [author] Serikoviene, Silvija [author] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2011 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
---|
Reproduktion: |
IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: International journal of online pedagogy and course design - Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011, 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2011 ; number:4 ; pages:62-76 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ244495947 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ244495947 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240202180227.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 150605s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ244495947 | ||
035 | |a (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kurilovas, Eugenijus |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject | ||
533 | |f IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Criteria | |
650 | 4 | |a Evaluation | |
650 | 4 | |a Learning Object | |
650 | 4 | |a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Optimisation Methods | |
650 | 4 | |a Quality | |
700 | 1 | |a Vinogradova, Irina |e author |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Serikoviene, Silvija |e author |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal of online pedagogy and course design |d Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011 |g 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ244419388 |w (DE-600)2703580-3 |x 2155-6881 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2011 |g number:4 |g pages:62-76 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 |m X:IGIG |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true |q text/html |y Abstract |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a ZDB-1-GIS | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 1 |j 2011 |e 4 |h 62-76 |
author_variant |
e k ek i v iv s s ss |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21556881:2011----::plctoomlilcieidcsoaayiadpiiainehdieauto |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
publishDate |
2011 |
allfields |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244495947 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kurilovas, Eugenijus verfasserin aut Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects 2011 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality Vinogradova, Irina author aut Serikoviene, Silvija author aut In International journal of online pedagogy and course design Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419388 (DE-600)2703580-3 2155-6881 nnns volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 2011 4 62-76 |
spelling |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244495947 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kurilovas, Eugenijus verfasserin aut Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects 2011 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality Vinogradova, Irina author aut Serikoviene, Silvija author aut In International journal of online pedagogy and course design Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419388 (DE-600)2703580-3 2155-6881 nnns volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 2011 4 62-76 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244495947 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kurilovas, Eugenijus verfasserin aut Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects 2011 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality Vinogradova, Irina author aut Serikoviene, Silvija author aut In International journal of online pedagogy and course design Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419388 (DE-600)2703580-3 2155-6881 nnns volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 2011 4 62-76 |
allfieldsGer |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244495947 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kurilovas, Eugenijus verfasserin aut Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects 2011 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality Vinogradova, Irina author aut Serikoviene, Silvija author aut In International journal of online pedagogy and course design Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419388 (DE-600)2703580-3 2155-6881 nnns volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 2011 4 62-76 |
allfieldsSound |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244495947 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kurilovas, Eugenijus verfasserin aut Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects 2011 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality Vinogradova, Irina author aut Serikoviene, Silvija author aut In International journal of online pedagogy and course design Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419388 (DE-600)2703580-3 2155-6881 nnns volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 2011 4 62-76 |
language |
English |
source |
In International journal of online pedagogy and course design 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 |
sourceStr |
In International journal of online pedagogy and course design 1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76 volume:1 year:2011 number:4 pages:62-76 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
International journal of online pedagogy and course design |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus @@aut@@ Vinogradova, Irina @@aut@@ Serikoviene, Silvija @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ244419388 |
id |
NLEJ244495947 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ244495947</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240202180227.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150605s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ244495947</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kurilovas, Eugenijus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learning Object</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optimisation Methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vinogradova, Irina</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serikoviene, Silvija</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of online pedagogy and course design</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244419388</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703580-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2155-6881</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:62-76</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="y">Abstract</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">62-76</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 |
author |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus |
spellingShingle |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus misc Criteria misc Evaluation misc Learning Object misc Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis misc Optimisation Methods misc Quality Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects |
authorStr |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ244419388 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2155-6881 |
topic_title |
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects Criteria Evaluation Learning Object Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Optimisation Methods Quality |
topic |
misc Criteria misc Evaluation misc Learning Object misc Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis misc Optimisation Methods misc Quality |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Criteria misc Evaluation misc Learning Object misc Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis misc Optimisation Methods misc Quality |
topic_browse |
misc Criteria misc Evaluation misc Learning Object misc Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis misc Optimisation Methods misc Quality |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of online pedagogy and course design |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ244419388 |
hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of online pedagogy and course design |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ244419388 (DE-600)2703580-3 |
title |
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ244495947 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 |
title_full |
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects |
author_sort |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus |
journal |
International journal of online pedagogy and course design |
journalStr |
International journal of online pedagogy and course design |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2011 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
62 |
author_browse |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus Vinogradova, Irina Serikoviene, Silvija |
container_volume |
1 |
physical |
Online-Ressource |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Kurilovas, Eugenijus |
doi_str_mv |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 |
author2-role |
author |
title_sort |
application of multiple criteria decision analysis and optimisation methods in evaluation of quality of learning objects |
title_auth |
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects |
abstract |
This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject |
abstractGer |
This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject |
abstract_unstemmed |
This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject |
collection_details |
ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects |
url |
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Vinogradova, Irina Serikoviene, Silvija |
author2Str |
Vinogradova, Irina Serikoviene, Silvija |
ppnlink |
NLEJ244419388 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T08:05:27.345Z |
_version_ |
1803816143261007872 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ244495947</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240202180227.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150605s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ244495947</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kurilovas, Eugenijus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Optimisation Methods in Evaluation of Quality of Learning Objects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper analyses and presents the new scientific models and methods for the expert evaluation of quality of learning objects (LOs) paying special attention to LOs reusability level. Currently all existing approaches in the area are quite subjective and depend only on the experience of the decision-makers. The authors analyse several scientific methods and principles to minimise the subjectivity level in the expert evaluation of LOs quality. They are: (a) the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis for identification of quality criteria, (b) technological quality criteria classification principle, (c) fuzzy group decision making theory to obtain evaluation measures, (d) normalisation of the weights of criteria, and (e) scalarisation method for LOs quality optimisation. The authors demonstrate that the complex application of these approaches could significantly improve the quality of the expert evaluation of LOs and noticeably reduce the level of the expert evaluation subjectivity. The paper also presents the example of practical application of these approaches for evaluation of LOs for Mathematics subject</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Learning Object</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optimisation Methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vinogradova, Irina</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serikoviene, Silvija</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of online pedagogy and course design</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2011), 4, Seite 62-76</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244419388</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703580-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2155-6881</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:62-76</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2011100105&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="y">Abstract</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">62-76</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399519 |