Accountability for Service Compliance : A Survey
In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individu...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Chen, Shiping [verfasserIn] Levy, David [author] Yao, Jinhui [author] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2012 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering - Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010, 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2012 ; number:1 ; pages:16-43 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ244503117 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ244503117 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240202180242.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 150605s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ244503117 | ||
| 035 | |a (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chen, Shiping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accountability for Service Compliance |b A Survey |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability | ||
| 533 | |f IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Accountability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Compliance Assurance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Survey | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trustworthiness | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Levy, David |e author |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yao, Jinhui |e author |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering |d Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 |g 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ244419558 |w (DE-600)2703819-1 |x 1947-3060 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:16-43 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 |m X:IGIG |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true |q text/html |y Abstract |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-GIS | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 2012 |e 1 |h 16-43 | ||
| author_variant |
s c sc d l dl j y jy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:19473060:2012----::conaiiyosrie |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| allfields |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244503117 (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chen, Shiping verfasserin aut Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey 2012 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness Levy, David author aut Yao, Jinhui author aut In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419558 (DE-600)2703819-1 1947-3060 nnns volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2012 1 16-43 |
| spelling |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244503117 (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chen, Shiping verfasserin aut Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey 2012 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness Levy, David author aut Yao, Jinhui author aut In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419558 (DE-600)2703819-1 1947-3060 nnns volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2012 1 16-43 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244503117 (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chen, Shiping verfasserin aut Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey 2012 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness Levy, David author aut Yao, Jinhui author aut In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419558 (DE-600)2703819-1 1947-3060 nnns volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2012 1 16-43 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244503117 (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chen, Shiping verfasserin aut Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey 2012 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness Levy, David author aut Yao, Jinhui author aut In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419558 (DE-600)2703819-1 1947-3060 nnns volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2012 1 16-43 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ244503117 (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Chen, Shiping verfasserin aut Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey 2012 Online-Ressource nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness Levy, David author aut Yao, Jinhui author aut In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244419558 (DE-600)2703819-1 1947-3060 nnns volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true text/html Abstract Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2012 1 16-43 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 |
| sourceStr |
In International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering 3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43 volume:3 year:2012 number:1 pages:16-43 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Chen, Shiping @@aut@@ Levy, David @@aut@@ Yao, Jinhui @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ244419558 |
| id |
NLEJ244503117 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ244503117</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240202180242.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150605s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/jssoe.2012010102</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ244503117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Shiping</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Accountability for Service Compliance</subfield><subfield code="b">A Survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compliance Assurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trustworthiness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levy, David</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yao, Jinhui</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244419558</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703819-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1947-3060</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-43</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="y">Abstract</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">16-43</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012 |
| author |
Chen, Shiping |
| spellingShingle |
Chen, Shiping misc Accountability misc Compliance Assurance misc Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) misc Survey misc Trustworthiness Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey |
| authorStr |
Chen, Shiping |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ244419558 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1947-3060 |
| topic_title |
Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey Accountability Compliance Assurance Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Survey Trustworthiness |
| topic |
misc Accountability misc Compliance Assurance misc Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) misc Survey misc Trustworthiness |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Accountability misc Compliance Assurance misc Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) misc Survey misc Trustworthiness |
| topic_browse |
misc Accountability misc Compliance Assurance misc Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) misc Survey misc Trustworthiness |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ244419558 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ244419558 (DE-600)2703819-1 |
| title |
Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ244503117 (VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 |
| title_full |
Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey |
| author_sort |
Chen, Shiping |
| journal |
International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering |
| journalStr |
International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
16 |
| author_browse |
Chen, Shiping Levy, David Yao, Jinhui |
| container_volume |
3 |
| physical |
Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Chen, Shiping |
| title_sub |
A Survey |
| doi_str_mv |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 |
| author2-role |
author |
| title_sort |
accountability for service compliancea survey |
| title_auth |
Accountability for Service Compliance A Survey |
| abstract |
In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability |
| abstractGer |
In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability |
| collection_details |
ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Accountability for Service Compliance |
| url |
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Levy, David Yao, Jinhui |
| author2Str |
Levy, David Yao, Jinhui |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ244419558 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.4018/jssoe.2012010102 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T08:06:50.525Z |
| _version_ |
1803816230481559552 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ244503117</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240202180242.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150605s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/jssoe.2012010102</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ244503117</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/jssoe.2012010102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Shiping</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Accountability for Service Compliance</subfield><subfield code="b">A Survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, a range of innovations in the ‘service’ related technologies have been witnessed, namely SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. Meanwhile, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) enables composing different services seamlessly to form new service network. The combination of the two trends allow individual organizations to overcome their limitation of computing resources and obtain the maximum value of the functionality themselves can provide. One major issue with such massive composition is to verify the compliance of participating entities. Composed services usually span several administrative domains, where each has its own priorities. Given the fact that an admission to a violation may cause penalties, it is conceivable that an entity may intend to deceive. To tackle this issue, ‘accountability’ has emerged as a promising concept to achieve system trustworthiness. Recently, accountability has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed. In this survey, the authors discuss the concept and desirable properties of accountability, clarify the requirements and differences that distinguish accountability to other related approaches, and systematically summarize and evaluate various approaches of accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">IGI Global InfoSci Journals Archive 2000 - 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compliance Assurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trustworthiness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levy, David</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yao, Jinhui</subfield><subfield code="e">author</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of systems and service-oriented engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2012), 1, Seite 16-43</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244419558</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703819-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1947-3060</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:16-43</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jssoe.2012010102&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="y">Abstract</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">16-43</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399703 |