A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research
In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mina, Ashraf [verfasserIn] Favaloro, Emmanuel J. [verfasserIn] Koutts, Jerry [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Walter de Gruyter ; 2008 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
7 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine - Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998, 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:46 ; year:2008 ; number:9 ; day:08 ; month:07 ; pages:1223-1229 ; extent:7 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ246724811 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ246724811 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506100902.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ246724811 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mina, Ashraf |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| 264 | 1 | |b Walter de Gruyter |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a 7 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a instrument evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a instrument implementation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a instrument selection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a laboratory financial management | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Favaloro, Emmanuel J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koutts, Jerry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 |g 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |w (DE-600)1492732-9 |x 1437-4331 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2008 |g number:9 |g day:08 |g month:07 |g pages:1223-1229 |g extent:7 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 46 |j 2008 |e 9 |b 08 |c 07 |h 1223-1229 |g 7 | ||
| author_variant |
a m am e j f ej ejf j k jk |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14374331:2008----::patclprahontueteetoeautobsciacamngmnadmlmn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2008 |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| allfields |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246724811 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Mina, Ashraf verfasserin aut A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research Walter de Gruyter 2008 7 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Koutts, Jerry verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2008 9 08 07 1223-1229 7 |
| spelling |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246724811 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Mina, Ashraf verfasserin aut A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research Walter de Gruyter 2008 7 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Koutts, Jerry verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2008 9 08 07 1223-1229 7 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246724811 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Mina, Ashraf verfasserin aut A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research Walter de Gruyter 2008 7 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Koutts, Jerry verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2008 9 08 07 1223-1229 7 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246724811 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Mina, Ashraf verfasserin aut A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research Walter de Gruyter 2008 7 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Koutts, Jerry verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2008 9 08 07 1223-1229 7 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246724811 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Mina, Ashraf verfasserin aut A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research Walter de Gruyter 2008 7 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Koutts, Jerry verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2008 9 08 07 1223-1229 7 |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229 volume:46 year:2008 number:9 day:08 month:07 pages:1223-1229 extent:7 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mina, Ashraf @@aut@@ Favaloro, Emmanuel J. @@aut@@ Koutts, Jerry @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2008-07-08T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| id |
NLEJ246724811 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ246724811</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506100902.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/CCLM.2008.264</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ246724811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mina, Ashraf</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument implementation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument selection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">laboratory financial management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Favaloro, Emmanuel J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koutts, Jerry</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1223-1229</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">1223-1229</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| author |
Mina, Ashraf |
| spellingShingle |
Mina, Ashraf misc instrument evaluation misc instrument implementation misc instrument selection misc laboratory financial management A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| authorStr |
Mina, Ashraf |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1437-4331 |
| topic_title |
A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research instrument evaluation instrument implementation instrument selection laboratory financial management |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter |
| publisherStr |
Walter de Gruyter |
| topic |
misc instrument evaluation misc instrument implementation misc instrument selection misc laboratory financial management |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc instrument evaluation misc instrument implementation misc instrument selection misc laboratory financial management |
| topic_browse |
misc instrument evaluation misc instrument implementation misc instrument selection misc laboratory financial management |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 |
| title |
A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ246724811 |
| title_full |
A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| author_sort |
Mina, Ashraf |
| journal |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| journalStr |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2008 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1223 |
| author_browse |
Mina, Ashraf Favaloro, Emmanuel J. Koutts, Jerry |
| container_volume |
46 |
| physical |
7 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mina, Ashraf |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
a practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| title_auth |
A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| abstract |
In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. |
| abstractGer |
In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
9 |
| title_short |
A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. Koutts, Jerry |
| author2Str |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. Koutts, Jerry |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248235222 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1515/CCLM.2008.264 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T09:11:38.058Z |
| _version_ |
1803820306855362560 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ246724811</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506100902.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/CCLM.2008.264</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ246724811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mina, Ashraf</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A practical approach to instrument selection, evaluation, basic financial management and implementation in pathology and research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In response to increasingly complex demands in terms of productivity and budgets, there is a critical need to avoid mistakes during instrument selection that will be financially costly, and adversely affect customers, staff, productivity and test turnaround time. As there is no “one size fits all”, guidelines must be appropriate to permit informed decision making. A Medline search was conducted to assess background knowledge in this area, using the terms “laboratory instrument selection” and “laboratory instrument evaluation”. Searches returned over 800 articles, of which only seven were directly related to the topic of the search, with most outdated, and suggesting a paucity of appropriate information. Additional resources used included the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) website and the Internet. Appropriate criteria for instrument selection were established in the current report based on subjective and objective (technical) evaluations. Additionally, a sound and simple financial approach is also suggested to help in making informed decisions and avoid costly mistakes. We propose that such a process as outlined in our report will protect laboratories from making costly and avoidable mistakes in the acquisition of major equipment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1223–9.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument implementation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">instrument selection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">laboratory financial management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Favaloro, Emmanuel J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koutts, Jerry</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2008), 9 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 1223-1229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1223-1229</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2008.264</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2008</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">1223-1229</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398033 |