Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis?
The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfor...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. [verfasserIn] Lippi, Giuseppe [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Walter de Gruyter ; 2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
13 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine - Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998, 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:48 ; year:2009 ; number:3 ; day:17 ; month:12 ; pages:309-321 ; extent:13 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ246729759 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ246729759 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506145550.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ246729759 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Favaloro, Emmanuel J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| 264 | 1 | |b Walter de Gruyter |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 13 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a diagnostic errors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a extra-analytical variables | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hemostasis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hemostasis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a post-analytical variables | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pre-analytical variables | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reporting guidelines | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lippi, Giuseppe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 |g 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |w (DE-600)1492732-9 |x 1437-4331 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2009 |g number:3 |g day:17 |g month:12 |g pages:309-321 |g extent:13 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 48 |j 2009 |e 3 |b 17 |c 12 |h 309-321 |g 13 | ||
| author_variant |
e j f ej ejf g l gl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14374331:2009----::aoaoyeotnohmsaiasyteiapsaayiaopruiyoeueros |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246729759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Walter de Gruyter 2009 13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines Lippi, Giuseppe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 48 2009 3 17 12 309-321 13 |
| spelling |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246729759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Walter de Gruyter 2009 13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines Lippi, Giuseppe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 48 2009 3 17 12 309-321 13 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246729759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Walter de Gruyter 2009 13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines Lippi, Giuseppe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 48 2009 3 17 12 309-321 13 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246729759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Walter de Gruyter 2009 13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines Lippi, Giuseppe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 48 2009 3 17 12 309-321 13 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246729759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Favaloro, Emmanuel J. verfasserin aut Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? Walter de Gruyter 2009 13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines Lippi, Giuseppe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 48 2009 3 17 12 309-321 13 |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321 volume:48 year:2009 number:3 day:17 month:12 pages:309-321 extent:13 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. @@aut@@ Lippi, Giuseppe @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-12-17T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| id |
NLEJ246729759 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ246729759</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506145550.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/CCLM.2010.061</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ246729759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Favaloro, Emmanuel J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diagnostic errors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extra-analytical variables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hemostasis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hemostasis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-analytical variables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pre-analytical variables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reporting guidelines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lippi, Giuseppe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:17</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:309-321</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">17</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">309-321</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| author |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. |
| spellingShingle |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. misc diagnostic errors misc extra-analytical variables misc hemostasis misc post-analytical variables misc pre-analytical variables misc reporting guidelines Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| authorStr |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1437-4331 |
| topic_title |
Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? diagnostic errors extra-analytical variables hemostasis post-analytical variables pre-analytical variables reporting guidelines |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter |
| publisherStr |
Walter de Gruyter |
| topic |
misc diagnostic errors misc extra-analytical variables misc hemostasis misc post-analytical variables misc pre-analytical variables misc reporting guidelines |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc diagnostic errors misc extra-analytical variables misc hemostasis misc post-analytical variables misc pre-analytical variables misc reporting guidelines |
| topic_browse |
misc diagnostic errors misc extra-analytical variables misc hemostasis misc post-analytical variables misc pre-analytical variables misc reporting guidelines |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 |
| title |
Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ246729759 |
| title_full |
Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| author_sort |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. |
| journal |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| journalStr |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
309 |
| author_browse |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. Lippi, Giuseppe |
| container_volume |
48 |
| physical |
13 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Favaloro, Emmanuel J. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| title_auth |
Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| abstract |
The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. |
| abstractGer |
The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Lippi, Giuseppe |
| author2Str |
Lippi, Giuseppe |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248235222 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1515/CCLM.2010.061 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T09:12:37.850Z |
| _version_ |
1803820369550770176 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ246729759</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506145550.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/CCLM.2010.061</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ246729759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Favaloro, Emmanuel J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The advent of modern instrumentation, with associated improvements in test performance and reliability, together with appropriate internal quality control (IQC) and external quality assurance (EQA) measures, has led to substantial reductions in analytical errors within hemostasis laboratories. Unfortunately, the reporting of incorrect or inappropriate test results still occurs, perhaps even as frequently as in the past. Many of these cases arise due to a variety of events largely outside the control of the laboratories performing the tests. These events are primarily preanalytical, related to sample collection and processing, but can also include post-analytical events related to the reporting and interpretation of test results. The current report provides an overview of these events, as well as guidance for prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for the post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, and how this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis. This report should be of interest to both the laboratory scientists working in hemostasis and clinicians that request and attempt to interpret the test results. Laboratory scientists are ultimately responsible for these test results, and there is a duty to provide both accurate and precise results to enable clinicians to manage patients appropriately and to avoid the need to recollect and retest. Also, clinicians will not be in a position to best diagnose and manage their patient unless they gain an appreciation of these issues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:309–21.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diagnostic errors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extra-analytical variables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hemostasis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hemostasis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-analytical variables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pre-analytical variables</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reporting guidelines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lippi, Giuseppe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2009), 3 vom: 17. Dez., Seite 309-321</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:17</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:309-321</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.061</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">17</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">309-321</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398033 |