Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice
Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important rol...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Walter de Gruyter ; 2011 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine - Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998, 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:49 ; year:2011 ; number:5 ; day:23 ; month:02 ; pages:835-844 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ246733691 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ246733691 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506145604.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ246733691 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice |
| 264 | 1 | |b Walter de Gruyter |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a errors reporting system | |
| 650 | 4 | |a laboratory errors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient safety | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality assurance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality indicators | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sciacovelli, Laura |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a O’Kane, Maurice |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Caciagli, Patrizio |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pellegrini, Cristina |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Da Rin, Giorgio |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ivanov, Agnes |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghys, Timothy |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Plebani, Mario |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 |g 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |w (DE-600)1492732-9 |x 1437-4331 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2011 |g number:5 |g day:23 |g month:02 |g pages:835-844 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 49 |j 2011 |e 5 |b 23 |c 02 |h 835-844 |g 10 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:14374331:2011----::ultidctrilbrtrmdcnfot |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246733691 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice Walter de Gruyter 2011 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators Sciacovelli, Laura oth O’Kane, Maurice oth Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab oth Caciagli, Patrizio oth Pellegrini, Cristina oth Da Rin, Giorgio oth Ivanov, Agnes oth Ghys, Timothy oth Plebani, Mario oth Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 49 2011 5 23 02 835-844 10 |
| spelling |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246733691 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice Walter de Gruyter 2011 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators Sciacovelli, Laura oth O’Kane, Maurice oth Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab oth Caciagli, Patrizio oth Pellegrini, Cristina oth Da Rin, Giorgio oth Ivanov, Agnes oth Ghys, Timothy oth Plebani, Mario oth Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 49 2011 5 23 02 835-844 10 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246733691 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice Walter de Gruyter 2011 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators Sciacovelli, Laura oth O’Kane, Maurice oth Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab oth Caciagli, Patrizio oth Pellegrini, Cristina oth Da Rin, Giorgio oth Ivanov, Agnes oth Ghys, Timothy oth Plebani, Mario oth Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 49 2011 5 23 02 835-844 10 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246733691 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice Walter de Gruyter 2011 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators Sciacovelli, Laura oth O’Kane, Maurice oth Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab oth Caciagli, Patrizio oth Pellegrini, Cristina oth Da Rin, Giorgio oth Ivanov, Agnes oth Ghys, Timothy oth Plebani, Mario oth Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 49 2011 5 23 02 835-844 10 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ246733691 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice Walter de Gruyter 2011 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators Sciacovelli, Laura oth O’Kane, Maurice oth Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab oth Caciagli, Patrizio oth Pellegrini, Cristina oth Da Rin, Giorgio oth Ivanov, Agnes oth Ghys, Timothy oth Plebani, Mario oth Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 49 2011 5 23 02 835-844 10 |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844 volume:49 year:2011 number:5 day:23 month:02 pages:835-844 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sciacovelli, Laura @@oth@@ O’Kane, Maurice @@oth@@ Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab @@oth@@ Caciagli, Patrizio @@oth@@ Pellegrini, Cristina @@oth@@ Da Rin, Giorgio @@oth@@ Ivanov, Agnes @@oth@@ Ghys, Timothy @@oth@@ Plebani, Mario @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2011-02-23T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| id |
NLEJ246733691 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ246733691</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506145604.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/CCLM.2011.128</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ246733691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">errors reporting system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">laboratory errors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality assurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sciacovelli, Laura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O’Kane, Maurice</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caciagli, Patrizio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pellegrini, Cristina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Da Rin, Giorgio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ivanov, Agnes</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghys, Timothy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plebani, Mario</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:49</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:23</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:835-844</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">49</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">23</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">835-844</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1437-4331 |
| topic_title |
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice errors reporting system laboratory errors patient safety quality assurance quality indicators |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter |
| publisherStr |
Walter de Gruyter |
| topic |
misc errors reporting system misc laboratory errors misc patient safety misc quality assurance misc quality indicators |
| spellingShingle |
misc errors reporting system misc laboratory errors misc patient safety misc quality assurance misc quality indicators Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc errors reporting system misc laboratory errors misc patient safety misc quality assurance misc quality indicators |
| topic_browse |
misc errors reporting system misc laboratory errors misc patient safety misc quality assurance misc quality indicators |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| author2_variant |
l s ls m o mo y a s ya yas p c pc c p cp r g d rg rgd a i ai t g tg m p mp |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 |
| title |
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ246733691 |
| title_full |
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice |
| journal |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| journalStr |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
835 |
| container_volume |
49 |
| physical |
10 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 |
| title_sort |
quality indicators in laboratory medicine: from theory to practice |
| title_auth |
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice |
| abstract |
Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. |
| abstractGer |
Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Sciacovelli, Laura O’Kane, Maurice Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab Caciagli, Patrizio Pellegrini, Cristina Da Rin, Giorgio Ivanov, Agnes Ghys, Timothy Plebani, Mario |
| author2Str |
Sciacovelli, Laura O’Kane, Maurice Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab Caciagli, Patrizio Pellegrini, Cristina Da Rin, Giorgio Ivanov, Agnes Ghys, Timothy Plebani, Mario |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248235222 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1515/CCLM.2011.128 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T09:13:29.993Z |
| _version_ |
1803820424225619968 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ246733691</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506145604.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/CCLM.2011.128</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ246733691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings. While Laboratory Medicine has an important role in the delivery of high-quality care, no consensus exists as yet on the use of QIs focussing on all steps of the laboratory total testing process (TTP), and further research in this area is required. Methods: In order to reduce errors in laboratory testing, the IFCC Working Group on “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) developed a series of Quality Indicators, specifically designed for clinical laboratories. In the first phase of the project, specific QIs for key processes of the TTP were identified, including all the pre-, intra- and post-analytic steps. The overall aim of the project is to create a common reporting system for clinical laboratories based on standardized data collection, and to define state-of-the-art and Quality Specifications (QSs) for each QI independent of: a) the size of organization and type of activities; b) the complexity of processes undertaken; and c) different degree of knowledge and ability of the staff. The aim of the present paper is to report the results collected from participating laboratories from February 2008 to December 2009 and to identify preliminary QSs. Results and conclusions: The results demonstrate that a Model of Quality Indicators managed as an External Quality Assurance Program can serve as a tool to monitor and control the pre-, intra- and post-analytical activities. It might also allow clinical laboratories to identify risks that lead to errors resulting in patient harm: identification and design of practices that eliminate medical errors; the sharing of information and education of clinical and laboratory teams on practices that reduce or prevent errors; the monitoring and evaluation of improvement activities.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">errors reporting system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">laboratory errors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient safety</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality assurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sciacovelli, Laura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O’Kane, Maurice</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Skaik, Younis Abdelwahab</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caciagli, Patrizio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pellegrini, Cristina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Da Rin, Giorgio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ivanov, Agnes</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghys, Timothy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plebani, Mario</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">49(2011), 5 vom: 23. Feb., Seite 835-844</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:49</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:23</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:835-844</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.128</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">49</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">23</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">835-844</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401636 |