False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American soc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
O’Callaghan, Patrick [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
De Gruyter ; 2013 |
---|
Umfang: |
24 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of European tort law - Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010, 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2013 ; number:3 ; day:01 ; month:11 ; pages:282-305 ; extent:24 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247075221 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ247075221 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220820030004.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220814s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247075221 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a O’Callaghan, Patrick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. |
264 | 1 | |b De Gruyter |c 2013 | |
300 | |a 24 | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. | ||
533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of European tort law |d Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010 |g 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248236032 |w (DE-600)2549736-4 |x 1868-9620 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:282-305 |g extent:24 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 4 |j 2013 |e 3 |b 01 |c 11 |h 282-305 |g 24 |
author_variant |
p o po |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18689620:2013----::aspiaynifrainaeiihohntennmurvee |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2013 |
publishDate |
2013 |
allfields |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247075221 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O’Callaghan, Patrick verfasserin aut False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. De Gruyter 2013 24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Enthalten in Journal of European tort law Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 (DE-627)NLEJ248236032 (DE-600)2549736-4 1868-9620 nnns volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2013 3 01 11 282-305 24 |
spelling |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247075221 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O’Callaghan, Patrick verfasserin aut False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. De Gruyter 2013 24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Enthalten in Journal of European tort law Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 (DE-627)NLEJ248236032 (DE-600)2549736-4 1868-9620 nnns volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2013 3 01 11 282-305 24 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247075221 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O’Callaghan, Patrick verfasserin aut False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. De Gruyter 2013 24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Enthalten in Journal of European tort law Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 (DE-627)NLEJ248236032 (DE-600)2549736-4 1868-9620 nnns volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2013 3 01 11 282-305 24 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247075221 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O’Callaghan, Patrick verfasserin aut False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. De Gruyter 2013 24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Enthalten in Journal of European tort law Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 (DE-627)NLEJ248236032 (DE-600)2549736-4 1868-9620 nnns volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2013 3 01 11 282-305 24 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247075221 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb O’Callaghan, Patrick verfasserin aut False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. De Gruyter 2013 24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Enthalten in Journal of European tort law Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 (DE-627)NLEJ248236032 (DE-600)2549736-4 1868-9620 nnns volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2013 3 01 11 282-305 24 |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of European tort law 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of European tort law 4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305 volume:4 year:2013 number:3 day:01 month:11 pages:282-305 extent:24 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of European tort law |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
O’Callaghan, Patrick @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2013-11-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248236032 |
id |
NLEJ247075221 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247075221</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820030004.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/jetl-2013-0019</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247075221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O’Callaghan, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of European tort law</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2549736-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1868-9620</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:282-305</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">282-305</subfield><subfield code="g">24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
author |
O’Callaghan, Patrick |
spellingShingle |
O’Callaghan, Patrick False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. |
authorStr |
O’Callaghan, Patrick |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248236032 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1868-9620 |
topic_title |
False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publisherStr |
De Gruyter |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of European tort law |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248236032 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of European tort law |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248236032 (DE-600)2549736-4 |
title |
False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247075221 |
title_full |
False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments |
author_sort |
O’Callaghan, Patrick |
journal |
Journal of European tort law |
journalStr |
Journal of European tort law |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2013 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
282 |
author_browse |
O’Callaghan, Patrick |
container_volume |
4 |
physical |
24 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
O’Callaghan, Patrick |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 |
title_sort |
false privacy and information gamesi wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments |
title_auth |
False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. |
abstract |
This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. |
abstractGer |
This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
NLEJ248236032 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1515/jetl-2013-0019 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T09:53:30.316Z |
_version_ |
1803822941148807168 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247075221</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820030004.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/jetl-2013-0019</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247075221</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O’Callaghan, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">False Privacy and Information GamesI wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper is a critique of false privacy, the proposition that privacy’s protective remit should extend to information that is entirely false. It argues that there are conceptual as well as doctrinal problems associated with such an action in tort law. First, drawing on the work of the American sociologist, Erving Goffman, the paper challenges the idea that the authentic self can be recognised in law. Second, the paper argues that false privacy sits uneasily with tort law’s doctrinal framework. While the paper focuses on English tort law, it pursues its lines of argument in a comparative context, exploring how German and US law give expression to false privacy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of European tort law</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2013), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 282-305</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2549736-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1868-9620</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:282-305</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0019</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">282-305</subfield><subfield code="g">24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3999414 |