External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature
Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 comple...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Abenhaim, Haim A. [verfasserIn] Varin, Jocelyne [verfasserIn] Boucher, Marc [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Walter de Gruyter ; 2008 2008 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York |
|---|---|
| Umfang: |
5 |
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of perinatal medicine - Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973, 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:37 ; year:2008 2008 ; number:2 ; day:28 28 ; month:10 ; pages:156-160 ; extent:5 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247143782 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ247143782 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506082212.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/JPM.2009.006 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247143782 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Abenhaim, Haim A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| 264 | 1 | |b Walter de Gruyter |c 2008 2008 | |
| 300 | |a 5 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York | ||
| 520 | |a Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Breech presentation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cesarean | |
| 650 | 4 | |a external cephalic version | |
| 650 | 4 | |a previous cesarean | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Varin, Jocelyne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boucher, Marc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of perinatal medicine |d Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973 |g 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248236229 |w (DE-600)1467968-1 |x 16193997 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2008 2008 |g number:2 |g day:28 28 |g month:10 |g pages:156-160 |g extent:5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 37 |j 2008 2008 |e 2 |b 28 28 |c 10 10 |h 156-160 |g 5 | ||
| author_variant |
h a a ha haa j v jv m b mb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:16193997:2008----::xenlehlcesoaogoewtarvoseaeneieyeotn6a |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2008 2008 |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| allfields |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247143782 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Abenhaim, Haim A. verfasserin aut External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature Walter de Gruyter 2008 2008 5 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean Varin, Jocelyne verfasserin aut Boucher, Marc verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 (DE-627)NLEJ248236229 (DE-600)1467968-1 16193997 nnns volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 2008 2008 2 28 28 10 10 156-160 5 |
| spelling |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247143782 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Abenhaim, Haim A. verfasserin aut External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature Walter de Gruyter 2008 2008 5 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean Varin, Jocelyne verfasserin aut Boucher, Marc verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 (DE-627)NLEJ248236229 (DE-600)1467968-1 16193997 nnns volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 2008 2008 2 28 28 10 10 156-160 5 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247143782 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Abenhaim, Haim A. verfasserin aut External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature Walter de Gruyter 2008 2008 5 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean Varin, Jocelyne verfasserin aut Boucher, Marc verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 (DE-627)NLEJ248236229 (DE-600)1467968-1 16193997 nnns volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 2008 2008 2 28 28 10 10 156-160 5 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247143782 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Abenhaim, Haim A. verfasserin aut External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature Walter de Gruyter 2008 2008 5 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean Varin, Jocelyne verfasserin aut Boucher, Marc verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 (DE-627)NLEJ248236229 (DE-600)1467968-1 16193997 nnns volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 2008 2008 2 28 28 10 10 156-160 5 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247143782 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Abenhaim, Haim A. verfasserin aut External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature Walter de Gruyter 2008 2008 5 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean Varin, Jocelyne verfasserin aut Boucher, Marc verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 (DE-627)NLEJ248236229 (DE-600)1467968-1 16193997 nnns volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 37 2008 2008 2 28 28 10 10 156-160 5 |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of perinatal medicine 37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160 volume:37 year:2008 2008 number:2 day:28 28 month:10 pages:156-160 extent:5 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of perinatal medicine |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Abenhaim, Haim A. @@aut@@ Varin, Jocelyne @@aut@@ Boucher, Marc @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2008-10-28T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248236229 |
| id |
NLEJ247143782 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247143782</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506082212.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/JPM.2009.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247143782</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abenhaim, Haim A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2008 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breech presentation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cesarean</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">external cephalic version</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">previous cesarean</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varin, Jocelyne</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boucher, Marc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of perinatal medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1467968-1</subfield><subfield code="x">16193997</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28 28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:156-160</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2008 2008</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">28 28</subfield><subfield code="c">10 10</subfield><subfield code="h">156-160</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| author |
Abenhaim, Haim A. |
| spellingShingle |
Abenhaim, Haim A. misc Breech presentation misc cesarean misc external cephalic version misc previous cesarean External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| authorStr |
Abenhaim, Haim A. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248236229 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
16193997 |
| topic_title |
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature Breech presentation cesarean external cephalic version previous cesarean |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter |
| publisherStr |
Walter de Gruyter |
| topic |
misc Breech presentation misc cesarean misc external cephalic version misc previous cesarean |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Breech presentation misc cesarean misc external cephalic version misc previous cesarean |
| topic_browse |
misc Breech presentation misc cesarean misc external cephalic version misc previous cesarean |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of perinatal medicine |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248236229 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of perinatal medicine |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248236229 (DE-600)1467968-1 |
| title |
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247143782 |
| title_full |
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| author_sort |
Abenhaim, Haim A. |
| journal |
Journal of perinatal medicine |
| journalStr |
Journal of perinatal medicine |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2008 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
156 |
| author_browse |
Abenhaim, Haim A. Varin, Jocelyne Boucher, Marc |
| container_volume |
37 |
| physical |
5 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Abenhaim, Haim A. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
external cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| title_auth |
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| abstract |
Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York |
| abstractGer |
Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version. ©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Varin, Jocelyne Boucher, Marc |
| author2Str |
Varin, Jocelyne Boucher, Marc |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248236229 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1515/JPM.2009.006 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T10:04:14.991Z |
| _version_ |
1803823617138491392 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247143782</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506082212.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/JPM.2009.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247143782</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abenhaim, Haim A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2008 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">©2009 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims: Whether or not women with a previous cesarean section should be considered for an external cephalic version remains unclear. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between a history of previous cesarean section and outcomes of external cephalic version for pregnancies at 36 completed weeks of gestation or more. Methods: Data on obstetrical history and on external cephalic version outcomes was obtained from the C.H.U. Sainte-Justine External Cephalic Version Database. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared among women with and without a history of previous cesarean section. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on success of external cephalic version while adjusting for parity, maternal body mass index, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Results: Over a 15-year period, 1425 external cephalic versions were attempted of which 36 (2.5%) were performed on women with a previous cesarean section. Although women with a history of previous cesarean section were more likely to be older and para >2 (38.93% vs. 15.0%), there were no difference in gestational age, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid index. Women with a prior cesarean section had a success rate similar to women without [50.0% vs. 51.6%, adjusted OR: 1.31 (0.48–3.59)]. Conclusion: Women with a previous cesarean section who undergo an external cephalic version have similar success rates than do women without. Concern about procedural success in women with a previous cesarean section is unwarranted and should not deter attempting an external cephalic version.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breech presentation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cesarean</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">external cephalic version</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">previous cesarean</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varin, Jocelyne</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boucher, Marc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of perinatal medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2008 2008), 2 vom: 28 28., Seite 156-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236229</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1467968-1</subfield><subfield code="x">16193997</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2008 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28 28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:156-160</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2008 2008</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">28 28</subfield><subfield code="c">10 10</subfield><subfield code="h">156-160</subfield><subfield code="g">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4010506 |