Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion
Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is recla...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Walter de Gruyter ; 2012 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
10 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Reviews on environmental health - Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986, 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:27 ; year:2012 ; number:4 ; day:29 ; month:09 ; pages:197-206 ; extent:10 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247534560 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ247534560 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220820032808.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247534560 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| 264 | 1 | |b Walter de Gruyter |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 10 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a direct potable reuse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a indirect potable reuse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a water resources management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a water reuse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a water stress | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arnold, Robert G. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sáez, Avelino E. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Snyder, Shane |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Maeng, Sung Kyu |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Changha |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Woods, Gwendolyn J. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Xiangdong |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Choi, Heechul |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Reviews on environmental health |d Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986 |g 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248236687 |w (DE-600)2609347-9 |x 2191-0308 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2012 |g number:4 |g day:29 |g month:09 |g pages:197-206 |g extent:10 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 27 |j 2012 |e 4 |b 29 |c 09 |h 197-206 |g 10 | ||
| matchkey_str |
article:21910308:2012----::ietoalruefeliewseaeiitmfr |
|---|---|
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| allfields |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247534560 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion Walter de Gruyter 2012 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress Arnold, Robert G. oth Sáez, Avelino E. oth Snyder, Shane oth Maeng, Sung Kyu oth Lee, Changha oth Woods, Gwendolyn J. oth Li, Xiangdong oth Choi, Heechul oth Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 (DE-627)NLEJ248236687 (DE-600)2609347-9 2191-0308 nnns volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 2012 4 29 09 197-206 10 |
| spelling |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247534560 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion Walter de Gruyter 2012 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress Arnold, Robert G. oth Sáez, Avelino E. oth Snyder, Shane oth Maeng, Sung Kyu oth Lee, Changha oth Woods, Gwendolyn J. oth Li, Xiangdong oth Choi, Heechul oth Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 (DE-627)NLEJ248236687 (DE-600)2609347-9 2191-0308 nnns volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 2012 4 29 09 197-206 10 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247534560 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion Walter de Gruyter 2012 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress Arnold, Robert G. oth Sáez, Avelino E. oth Snyder, Shane oth Maeng, Sung Kyu oth Lee, Changha oth Woods, Gwendolyn J. oth Li, Xiangdong oth Choi, Heechul oth Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 (DE-627)NLEJ248236687 (DE-600)2609347-9 2191-0308 nnns volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 2012 4 29 09 197-206 10 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247534560 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion Walter de Gruyter 2012 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress Arnold, Robert G. oth Sáez, Avelino E. oth Snyder, Shane oth Maeng, Sung Kyu oth Lee, Changha oth Woods, Gwendolyn J. oth Li, Xiangdong oth Choi, Heechul oth Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 (DE-627)NLEJ248236687 (DE-600)2609347-9 2191-0308 nnns volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 2012 4 29 09 197-206 10 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247534560 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion Walter de Gruyter 2012 10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress Arnold, Robert G. oth Sáez, Avelino E. oth Snyder, Shane oth Maeng, Sung Kyu oth Lee, Changha oth Woods, Gwendolyn J. oth Li, Xiangdong oth Choi, Heechul oth Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 (DE-627)NLEJ248236687 (DE-600)2609347-9 2191-0308 nnns volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 27 2012 4 29 09 197-206 10 |
| source |
Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Reviews on environmental health 27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206 volume:27 year:2012 number:4 day:29 month:09 pages:197-206 extent:10 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Reviews on environmental health |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Arnold, Robert G. @@oth@@ Sáez, Avelino E. @@oth@@ Snyder, Shane @@oth@@ Maeng, Sung Kyu @@oth@@ Lee, Changha @@oth@@ Woods, Gwendolyn J. @@oth@@ Li, Xiangdong @@oth@@ Choi, Heechul @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-09-29T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248236687 |
| id |
NLEJ247534560 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247534560</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820032808.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/reveh-2012-0027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247534560</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">direct potable reuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indirect potable reuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water resources management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water reuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arnold, Robert G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sáez, Avelino E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Snyder, Shane</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maeng, Sung Kyu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Changha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Woods, Gwendolyn J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xiangdong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Heechul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Reviews on environmental health</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236687</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2609347-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2191-0308</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:197-206</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">197-206</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248236687 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2191-0308 |
| topic_title |
Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion direct potable reuse indirect potable reuse water resources management water reuse water stress |
| publisher |
Walter de Gruyter |
| publisherStr |
Walter de Gruyter |
| topic |
misc direct potable reuse misc indirect potable reuse misc water resources management misc water reuse misc water stress |
| spellingShingle |
misc direct potable reuse misc indirect potable reuse misc water resources management misc water reuse misc water stress Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc direct potable reuse misc indirect potable reuse misc water resources management misc water reuse misc water stress |
| topic_browse |
misc direct potable reuse misc indirect potable reuse misc water resources management misc water reuse misc water stress |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| author2_variant |
r g a rg rga a e s ae aes s s ss s k m sk skm c l cl g j w gj gjw x l xl h c hc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Reviews on environmental health |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248236687 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Reviews on environmental health |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248236687 (DE-600)2609347-9 |
| title |
Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247534560 |
| title_full |
Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| journal |
Reviews on environmental health |
| journalStr |
Reviews on environmental health |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2012 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
197 |
| container_volume |
27 |
| physical |
10 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 |
| title_sort |
direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| title_auth |
Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| abstract |
Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. |
| abstractGer |
Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Arnold, Robert G. Sáez, Avelino E. Snyder, Shane Maeng, Sung Kyu Lee, Changha Woods, Gwendolyn J. Li, Xiangdong Choi, Heechul |
| author2Str |
Arnold, Robert G. Sáez, Avelino E. Snyder, Shane Maeng, Sung Kyu Lee, Changha Woods, Gwendolyn J. Li, Xiangdong Choi, Heechul |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248236687 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1515/reveh-2012-0027 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T10:43:51.760Z |
| _version_ |
1803826109361422336 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247534560</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820032808.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/reveh-2012-0027</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247534560</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Direct potable reuse of reclaimed wastewater: it is time for a rational discussion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Walter de Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Water shortage arising from rapid population growth and relocation has produced an unprecedented degree of stress on regional water resources. Engineered solutions to relieve water stress are frequently based on the use of water of impaired initial quality. Chief among these impaired waters is reclaimed wastewater. For the most part, however, the breadth of both acceptable uses and use-dependent degree of treatment for reclaimed wastewater remain to be established. The chief advantages of direct potable reuse (DPR) relative to other forms of wastewater reclamation and reuse are that (i) all wastewater reclaimed for DPR can be readily used in water-stressed areas and (ii) delivery to points of use does not require a separate distribution system. The drawbacks are related to the need for highly competent, continuous on-line verification of water quality and the cost of treating all reclaimed wastewater to meet potable use requirements when only a small fraction will be used for potable purposes. We have attempted to explore those differences, providing quantitative comparisons where possible, to support selection among water reuse options in water-stressed areas.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">direct potable reuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indirect potable reuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water resources management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water reuse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">water stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arnold, Robert G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sáez, Avelino E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Snyder, Shane</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maeng, Sung Kyu</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Changha</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Woods, Gwendolyn J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xiangdong</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Heechul</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Reviews on environmental health</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 1986</subfield><subfield code="g">27(2012), 4 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 197-206</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236687</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2609347-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2191-0308</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:27</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:197-206</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2012-0027</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">27</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield><subfield code="h">197-206</subfield><subfield code="g">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397748 |