Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It?
Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical &quo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sapir, Shimon [verfasserIn] Połczyńska, Monika [verfasserIn] Tobin, Yishai [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
Versita ; 2009 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics - Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973, 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:45 ; year:2009 ; number:2 ; day:25 ; month:06 ; pages:301-311 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247653101 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ247653101 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220820033423.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247653101 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sapir, Shimon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? |
| 264 | 1 | |b Versita |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Traumatic Brain Injury | |
| 650 | 4 | |a speech acoustics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a formant centralization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a vowel space area | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Połczyńska, Monika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tobin, Yishai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |d Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 |g 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 |w (DE-600)2403591-9 |x 1897-7499 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2009 |g number:2 |g day:25 |g month:06 |g pages:301-311 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 45 |j 2009 |e 2 |b 25 |c 6 |h 301-311 |g 11 | ||
| author_variant |
s s ss m p mp y t yt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18977499:2009----::hdeteoesaerasncutcercaloifrnitdsrhifonravwlri |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2009 |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| allfields |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653101 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sapir, Shimon verfasserin aut Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? Versita 2009 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area Połczyńska, Monika verfasserin aut Tobin, Yishai verfasserin aut Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2009 2 25 6 301-311 11 |
| spelling |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653101 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sapir, Shimon verfasserin aut Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? Versita 2009 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area Połczyńska, Monika verfasserin aut Tobin, Yishai verfasserin aut Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2009 2 25 6 301-311 11 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653101 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sapir, Shimon verfasserin aut Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? Versita 2009 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area Połczyńska, Monika verfasserin aut Tobin, Yishai verfasserin aut Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2009 2 25 6 301-311 11 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653101 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sapir, Shimon verfasserin aut Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? Versita 2009 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area Połczyńska, Monika verfasserin aut Tobin, Yishai verfasserin aut Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2009 2 25 6 301-311 11 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653101 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Sapir, Shimon verfasserin aut Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? Versita 2009 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area Połczyńska, Monika verfasserin aut Tobin, Yishai verfasserin aut Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 45 2009 2 25 6 301-311 11 |
| source |
Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics 45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311 volume:45 year:2009 number:2 day:25 month:06 pages:301-311 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sapir, Shimon @@aut@@ Połczyńska, Monika @@aut@@ Tobin, Yishai @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2009-06-25T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248236636 |
| id |
NLEJ247653101 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247653101</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820033423.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247653101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sapir, Shimon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Versita</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traumatic Brain Injury</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">speech acoustics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">formant centralization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vowel space area</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Połczyńska, Monika</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tobin, Yishai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236636</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2403591-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1897-7499</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:45</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:25</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:301-311</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">45</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">25</subfield><subfield code="c">6</subfield><subfield code="h">301-311</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| author |
Sapir, Shimon |
| spellingShingle |
Sapir, Shimon misc Traumatic Brain Injury misc speech acoustics misc formant centralization misc vowel space area Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? |
| authorStr |
Sapir, Shimon |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248236636 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1897-7499 |
| topic_title |
Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? Traumatic Brain Injury speech acoustics formant centralization vowel space area |
| publisher |
Versita |
| publisherStr |
Versita |
| topic |
misc Traumatic Brain Injury misc speech acoustics misc formant centralization misc vowel space area |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Traumatic Brain Injury misc speech acoustics misc formant centralization misc vowel space area |
| topic_browse |
misc Traumatic Brain Injury misc speech acoustics misc formant centralization misc vowel space area |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248236636 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 |
| title |
Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247653101 |
| title_full |
Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? |
| author_sort |
Sapir, Shimon |
| journal |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
| journalStr |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2009 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
301 |
| author_browse |
Sapir, Shimon Połczyńska, Monika Tobin, Yishai |
| container_volume |
45 |
| physical |
11 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sapir, Shimon |
| doi_str_mv |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
why does the vowel space area as an acoustic metric fail to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation and what can be done about it? |
| title_auth |
Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? |
| abstract |
Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. |
| abstractGer |
Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Połczyńska, Monika Tobin, Yishai |
| author2Str |
Połczyńska, Monika Tobin, Yishai |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248236636 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T10:56:14.344Z |
| _version_ |
1803826888017182720 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247653101</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820033423.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247653101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sapir, Shimon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why Does the Vowel Space Area as an Acoustic Metric Fail to Differentiate Dysarthric from Normal Vowel Articulation and what can be Done About It?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Versita</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. The vowel space area (VSA) has been used as an acoustic metric of dysarthric vowel articulation, but with varying degrees of success. Here we test the hypothesis that the failure of the VSA to differentiate dysarthric from normal vowel articulation has to do in part with statistical "noise" that is introduced by insensitivity of Euclidean distances that define the VSA to vowel centralisation.Methods. Differences in vowel production between 5 dysarthric young men post traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 5 young men who served as healthy controls (HC) were tested with four acoustic metrics: the triangular VSA, constructed with the first (F1) and second (F2) formants of the vowels /i/, /u/, /a/, and the Euclidean distances (EDs) between the vowels /i/ and /u (EDiu), /i/ and /a/ (EDia), and /a/ and /u/ (EDau) that define the VSA. The formant frequencies of these metrics were logarithmically scaled to reduce irrelevant interspeaker variability.Results. The VSA failed to differentiate between the TBI and HC groups, as did the the EDia, and EDau. In contrast, the EDiu effectively differentiated between groups, both statistically (unpaired t-test, p=0.0174) and in terms effect size (1.88, large). The significant difference was in the expected direction, indicating vowel centralisation and articulatory undershoot in the TBI speakers.Conclusion. The VSA is likely to perform poorly as an acoustic metric of dysarthric speech because of "noise" introduced by Euclidian distances (EDs) metrics that are not sensitive to the articulatory abnormality (in this study, the EDia and EDau). Thus, rather than using the VSA, it might be more beneficial to use only those EDs that are likely to be sensitive to vowel centralisation, as might be the case with the EDiu.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Traumatic Brain Injury</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">speech acoustics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">formant centralization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vowel space area</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Połczyńska, Monika</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tobin, Yishai</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">45(2009), 2 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 301-311</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236636</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2403591-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1897-7499</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:45</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2009</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:25</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:301-311</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0018-2</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">45</subfield><subfield code="j">2009</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">25</subfield><subfield code="c">6</subfield><subfield code="h">301-311</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4005537 |