Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation
This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association mus...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
Versita ; 2010 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
27 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics - Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973, 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:46 ; year:2010 ; number:2 ; day:29 ; month:07 ; pages:193-219 ; extent:27 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247653330 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ247653330 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220820033424.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220814s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a artikel_Grundlieferung.pp |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247653330 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation |
264 | 1 | |b Versita |c 2010 | |
300 | |a 27 | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. | ||
533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
650 | 4 | |a Corpus linguistics | |
650 | 4 | |a lexicalization | |
650 | 4 | |a morphology | |
650 | 4 | |a productivity | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |d Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 |g 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 |w (DE-600)2403591-9 |x 1897-7499 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g day:29 |g month:07 |g pages:193-219 |g extent:27 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 46 |j 2010 |e 2 |b 29 |c 7 |h 193-219 |g 27 |
author_variant |
j f d jfd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18977499:2010----::rdciiyseiaiainrqecbsdyoh |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
publishDate |
2010 |
allfields |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653330 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús verfasserin aut Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation Versita 2010 27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2010 2 29 7 193-219 27 |
spelling |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653330 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús verfasserin aut Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation Versita 2010 27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2010 2 29 7 193-219 27 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653330 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús verfasserin aut Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation Versita 2010 27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2010 2 29 7 193-219 27 |
allfieldsGer |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653330 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús verfasserin aut Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation Versita 2010 27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2010 2 29 7 193-219 27 |
allfieldsSound |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x doi artikel_Grundlieferung.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247653330 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús verfasserin aut Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation Versita 2010 27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 (DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 1897-7499 nnns volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 46 2010 2 29 7 193-219 27 |
source |
Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics 46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219 volume:46 year:2010 number:2 day:29 month:07 pages:193-219 extent:27 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-07-29T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248236636 |
id |
NLEJ247653330 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247653330</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820033424.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247653330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Versita</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corpus linguistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lexicalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">morphology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236636</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2403591-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1897-7499</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:193-219</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">7</subfield><subfield code="h">193-219</subfield><subfield code="g">27</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
author |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús |
spellingShingle |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús misc Corpus linguistics misc lexicalization misc morphology misc productivity Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation |
authorStr |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248236636 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1897-7499 |
topic_title |
Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation Corpus linguistics lexicalization morphology productivity |
publisher |
Versita |
publisherStr |
Versita |
topic |
misc Corpus linguistics misc lexicalization misc morphology misc productivity |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Corpus linguistics misc lexicalization misc morphology misc productivity |
topic_browse |
misc Corpus linguistics misc lexicalization misc morphology misc productivity |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248236636 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248236636 (DE-600)2403591-9 |
title |
Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247653330 |
title_full |
Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation |
author_sort |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús |
journal |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
journalStr |
Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2010 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
193 |
author_browse |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús |
container_volume |
46 |
physical |
27 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús |
doi_str_mv |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x |
title_sort |
productivity vs. lexicalization: frequency-based hypotheses on word-formation |
title_auth |
Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation |
abstract |
This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. |
abstractGer |
This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
NLEJ248236636 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x |
up_date |
2024-07-06T10:56:16.787Z |
_version_ |
1803826890577805312 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247653330</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820033424.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">artikel_Grundlieferung.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247653330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Productivity vs. Lexicalization: Frequency-Based Hypotheses on Word-Formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">Versita</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article looks at morphological productivity and lexicalization. Productivity, first, bears a significant relationship with frequency because both seem to be subtly interlinked through low-frequency items. Much the same happens between lexicalization and frequency, although their association must be seen from a different angle because lexicalized words tend to have greater frequencies than non-lexicalized words. The novelty of this paper is that it provides a link between the above two notions and corpus-based frequency figures, and then operates a formula (π) on two sets of units, some lexicalized, some synchronically analysable. The two subcorpora confirm a correct function of π to tell between words which tend to be used by means of word-formation vs. words which already exist in the individual's lexicon.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corpus linguistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lexicalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">morphology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : de Gruyter, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2010), 2 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 193-219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236636</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2403591-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1897-7499</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:193-219</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-010-0010-x</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">7</subfield><subfield code="h">193-219</subfield><subfield code="g">27</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.397706 |