Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?
The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Plebani, Mario [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erschienen: |
De Gruyter ; 2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
8 |
|---|
| Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine - Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998, 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 |
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:56 ; year:2017 ; number:10 ; day:02 ; month:11 ; pages:1579-1586 ; extent:8 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247954543 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ247954543 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230506005053.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a articles2015-2020.pp |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247954543 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Plebani, Mario |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| 264 | 1 | |b De Gruyter |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 8 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. | ||
| 533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a extra-analytical phases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a harmonization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a laboratory information | |
| 650 | 4 | |a patient outcomes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a standardization | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 |g 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |w (DE-600)1492732-9 |x 1437-4331 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2017 |g number:10 |g day:02 |g month:11 |g pages:1579-1586 |g extent:8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 56 |j 2017 |e 10 |b 02 |c 11 |h 1579-1586 |g 8 | ||
| author_variant |
m p mp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14374331:2017----::amnztoilbrtrmdcnmrtac |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247954543 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Plebani, Mario verfasserin aut Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? De Gruyter 2017 8 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 56 2017 10 02 11 1579-1586 8 |
| spelling |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247954543 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Plebani, Mario verfasserin aut Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? De Gruyter 2017 8 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 56 2017 10 02 11 1579-1586 8 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247954543 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Plebani, Mario verfasserin aut Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? De Gruyter 2017 8 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 56 2017 10 02 11 1579-1586 8 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247954543 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Plebani, Mario verfasserin aut Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? De Gruyter 2017 8 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 56 2017 10 02 11 1579-1586 8 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247954543 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Plebani, Mario verfasserin aut Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? De Gruyter 2017 8 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 (DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 1437-4331 nnns volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 56 2017 10 02 11 1579-1586 8 |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586 volume:56 year:2017 number:10 day:02 month:11 pages:1579-1586 extent:8 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Plebani, Mario @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-11-02T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| id |
NLEJ247954543 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247954543</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506005053.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/cclm-2017-0865</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247954543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plebani, Mario</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extra-analytical phases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">harmonization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">laboratory information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">standardization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:56</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1579-1586</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">56</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">1579-1586</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
| author |
Plebani, Mario |
| spellingShingle |
Plebani, Mario misc extra-analytical phases misc harmonization misc laboratory information misc patient outcomes misc quality misc standardization Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| authorStr |
Plebani, Mario |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1437-4331 |
| topic_title |
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? extra-analytical phases harmonization laboratory information patient outcomes quality standardization |
| publisher |
De Gruyter |
| publisherStr |
De Gruyter |
| topic |
misc extra-analytical phases misc harmonization misc laboratory information misc patient outcomes misc quality misc standardization |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc extra-analytical phases misc harmonization misc laboratory information misc patient outcomes misc quality misc standardization |
| topic_browse |
misc extra-analytical phases misc harmonization misc laboratory information misc patient outcomes misc quality misc standardization |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248235222 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248235222 (DE-600)1492732-9 |
| title |
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247954543 |
| title_full |
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| author_sort |
Plebani, Mario |
| journal |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| journalStr |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1579 |
| author_browse |
Plebani, Mario |
| container_volume |
56 |
| physical |
8 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Plebani, Mario |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 |
| title_sort |
harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| title_auth |
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| abstract |
The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. |
| abstractGer |
The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
10 |
| title_short |
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ248235222 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1515/cclm-2017-0865 |
| up_date |
2024-07-05T22:09:55.250Z |
| _version_ |
1803778675449004032 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247954543</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230506005053.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/cclm-2017-0865</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247954543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plebani, Mario</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extra-analytical phases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">harmonization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">laboratory information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">patient outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">standardization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">56(2017), 10 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 1579-1586</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248235222</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1492732-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1437-4331</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:56</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1579-1586</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0865</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">56</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">10</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">1579-1586</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4003696 |