Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective
Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Beckers, Kathleen [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
De Gruyter Mouton ; 2017 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
11 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Communications - Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976, 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:43 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; day:6 ; month:10 ; pages:101-111 ; extent:11 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ247965294 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ247965294 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220820175549.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/commun-2017-0040 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a articles2015-2020.pp |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ247965294 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Beckers, Kathleen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective |
264 | 1 | |b De Gruyter Mouton |c 2017 | |
300 | |a 11 | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. | ||
533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
650 | 4 | |a journalists | |
650 | 4 | |a professional opinions | |
650 | 4 | |a survey | |
650 | 4 | |a vox pops | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Communications |d Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976 |g 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 |w (DE-627)NLEJ24823529X |w (DE-600)2084562-5 |x 1613-4087 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g day:6 |g month:10 |g pages:101-111 |g extent:11 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 43 |j 2017 |e 1 |b 6 |c 10 |h 101-111 |g 11 |
author_variant |
k b kb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:16134087:2017----::oppiteeshjunlss |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247965294 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Beckers, Kathleen verfasserin aut Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective De Gruyter Mouton 2017 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften journalists professional opinions survey vox pops Enthalten in Communications Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 (DE-627)NLEJ24823529X (DE-600)2084562-5 1613-4087 nnns volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 43 2017 1 6 10 101-111 11 |
spelling |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247965294 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Beckers, Kathleen verfasserin aut Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective De Gruyter Mouton 2017 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften journalists professional opinions survey vox pops Enthalten in Communications Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 (DE-627)NLEJ24823529X (DE-600)2084562-5 1613-4087 nnns volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 43 2017 1 6 10 101-111 11 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247965294 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Beckers, Kathleen verfasserin aut Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective De Gruyter Mouton 2017 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften journalists professional opinions survey vox pops Enthalten in Communications Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 (DE-627)NLEJ24823529X (DE-600)2084562-5 1613-4087 nnns volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 43 2017 1 6 10 101-111 11 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247965294 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Beckers, Kathleen verfasserin aut Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective De Gruyter Mouton 2017 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften journalists professional opinions survey vox pops Enthalten in Communications Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 (DE-627)NLEJ24823529X (DE-600)2084562-5 1613-4087 nnns volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 43 2017 1 6 10 101-111 11 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ247965294 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Beckers, Kathleen verfasserin aut Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective De Gruyter Mouton 2017 11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften journalists professional opinions survey vox pops Enthalten in Communications Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 (DE-627)NLEJ24823529X (DE-600)2084562-5 1613-4087 nnns volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 43 2017 1 6 10 101-111 11 |
source |
Enthalten in Communications 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Communications 43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111 volume:43 year:2017 number:1 day:6 month:10 pages:101-111 extent:11 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
journalists professional opinions survey vox pops |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Communications |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Beckers, Kathleen @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-10-06T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ24823529X |
id |
NLEJ247965294 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247965294</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820175549.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/commun-2017-0040</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247965294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beckers, Kathleen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter Mouton</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">journalists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">professional opinions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vox pops</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Communications</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24823529X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2084562-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1613-4087</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:6</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:101-111</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">6</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">101-111</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
author |
Beckers, Kathleen |
spellingShingle |
Beckers, Kathleen misc journalists misc professional opinions misc survey misc vox pops Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective |
authorStr |
Beckers, Kathleen |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ24823529X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1613-4087 |
topic_title |
Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective journalists professional opinions survey vox pops |
publisher |
De Gruyter Mouton |
publisherStr |
De Gruyter Mouton |
topic |
misc journalists misc professional opinions misc survey misc vox pops |
topic_unstemmed |
misc journalists misc professional opinions misc survey misc vox pops |
topic_browse |
misc journalists misc professional opinions misc survey misc vox pops |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Communications |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ24823529X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Communications |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ24823529X (DE-600)2084562-5 |
title |
Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ247965294 |
title_full |
Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective |
author_sort |
Beckers, Kathleen |
journal |
Communications |
journalStr |
Communications |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
101 |
author_browse |
Beckers, Kathleen |
container_volume |
43 |
physical |
11 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Beckers, Kathleen |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 |
title_sort |
vox pops in the news: the journalists’ perspective |
title_auth |
Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective |
abstract |
Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. |
abstractGer |
Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
NLEJ24823529X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1515/commun-2017-0040 |
up_date |
2024-07-05T22:12:39.274Z |
_version_ |
1803778847436439552 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ247965294</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820175549.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/commun-2017-0040</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ247965294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beckers, Kathleen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vox pops in the news: The journalists’ perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter Mouton</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vox pops are a frequent and growing practice in the news. However, there seems to be a general tendency in journalistic practice to be quite critical about these interviews with the ordinary (wo)man on the street. Yet, hardly any research exists about journalists’ evaluation of vox pops or that has gone further than speculating about why they are used. This study tackles these research gaps using a survey involving 253 Belgian journalists. We conclude that vox pops are used mostly by audiovisual journalists, and that journalists seem to use them mostly because vox pops increase audience involvement with a news item. Generally, the journalists are quite negative about vox pops, but journalists who perceive them as involving and good public opinion tools are more positive. Against our expectations, the experience of journalists does not influence the evaluation nor the use of vox pops.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">journalists</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">professional opinions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">survey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vox pops</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Communications</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">43(2017), 1 vom: 6. Okt., Seite 101-111</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24823529X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2084562-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1613-4087</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:6</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:101-111</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0040</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">6</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">101-111</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3996916 |