Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE)
In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political signif...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Cases, Laurent J. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
De Gruyter ; 2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
18 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of Ancient History - Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013, 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; day:11 ; month:06 ; pages:233-250 ; extent:18 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ248045199 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ248045199 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220820035450.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220814s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/jah-2018-0017 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a articles2015-2020.pp |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ248045199 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cases, Laurent J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) |
264 | 1 | |b De Gruyter |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 18 | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. | ||
533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
650 | 4 | |a Lucius Domitius Alexander | |
650 | 4 | |a Maxentius | |
650 | 4 | |a Africa and the Tetrarchy | |
650 | 4 | |a Constantine | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Ancient History |d Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013 |g 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 |w (DE-627)NLEJ24823594X |w (DE-600)2722400-4 |x 2324-8114 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g day:11 |g month:06 |g pages:233-250 |g extent:18 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 7 |j 2019 |e 1 |b 11 |c 06 |h 233-250 |g 18 |
author_variant |
l j c lj ljc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:23248114:2019----::oitadiiwrnfiauighttacyhrblinfuiso |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248045199 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Cases, Laurent J. verfasserin aut Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) De Gruyter 2019 18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 (DE-627)NLEJ24823594X (DE-600)2722400-4 2324-8114 nnns volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2019 1 11 06 233-250 18 |
spelling |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248045199 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Cases, Laurent J. verfasserin aut Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) De Gruyter 2019 18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 (DE-627)NLEJ24823594X (DE-600)2722400-4 2324-8114 nnns volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2019 1 11 06 233-250 18 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248045199 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Cases, Laurent J. verfasserin aut Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) De Gruyter 2019 18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 (DE-627)NLEJ24823594X (DE-600)2722400-4 2324-8114 nnns volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2019 1 11 06 233-250 18 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248045199 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Cases, Laurent J. verfasserin aut Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) De Gruyter 2019 18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 (DE-627)NLEJ24823594X (DE-600)2722400-4 2324-8114 nnns volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2019 1 11 06 233-250 18 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248045199 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Cases, Laurent J. verfasserin aut Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) De Gruyter 2019 18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 (DE-627)NLEJ24823594X (DE-600)2722400-4 2324-8114 nnns volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 7 2019 1 11 06 233-250 18 |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of Ancient History 7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250 volume:7 year:2019 number:1 day:11 month:06 pages:233-250 extent:18 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of Ancient History |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cases, Laurent J. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-06-11T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ24823594X |
id |
NLEJ248045199 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ248045199</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820035450.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/jah-2018-0017</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ248045199</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cases, Laurent J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lucius Domitius Alexander</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maxentius</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Africa and the Tetrarchy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constantine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Ancient History</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24823594X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2722400-4</subfield><subfield code="x">2324-8114</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:233-250</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">233-250</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
author |
Cases, Laurent J. |
spellingShingle |
Cases, Laurent J. misc Lucius Domitius Alexander misc Maxentius misc Africa and the Tetrarchy misc Constantine Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) |
authorStr |
Cases, Laurent J. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ24823594X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2324-8114 |
topic_title |
Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) Lucius Domitius Alexander Maxentius Africa and the Tetrarchy Constantine |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publisherStr |
De Gruyter |
topic |
misc Lucius Domitius Alexander misc Maxentius misc Africa and the Tetrarchy misc Constantine |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Lucius Domitius Alexander misc Maxentius misc Africa and the Tetrarchy misc Constantine |
topic_browse |
misc Lucius Domitius Alexander misc Maxentius misc Africa and the Tetrarchy misc Constantine |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Ancient History |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ24823594X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Ancient History |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ24823594X (DE-600)2722400-4 |
title |
Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ248045199 |
title_full |
Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) |
author_sort |
Cases, Laurent J. |
journal |
Journal of Ancient History |
journalStr |
Journal of Ancient History |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
233 |
author_browse |
Cases, Laurent J. |
container_volume |
7 |
physical |
18 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Cases, Laurent J. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 |
title_sort |
society and civil war in africa during the tetrarchy: the rebellion of lucius domitius alexander (308–310 ce) |
title_auth |
Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) |
abstract |
In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. |
abstractGer |
In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. |
abstract_unstemmed |
In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE) |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
NLEJ24823594X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1515/jah-2018-0017 |
up_date |
2024-07-05T22:26:03.997Z |
_version_ |
1803779691252809728 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ248045199</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820035450.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/jah-2018-0017</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ248045199</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cases, Laurent J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Society and Civil War in Africa During the Tetrarchy: The Rebellion of Lucius Domitius Alexander (308–310 CE)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the year 308 CE, the African army raised to the purple the agens vices praefectorum praetorio Lucius Domitius Alexander. This rather unique case of a vicarius becoming emperor is deserving of investigation. Scholarly interest on the matter has traditionally focused on the broader political significance, treating Alexander as a traditional usurper. This paper argues that, contrary to traditional studies, the regime of Alexander focused on very local, African tropes. The uniqueness of the advertisement suggests that this African usurpation was the product of discontent internal to Africa; in other words, it is a departure from the usurpations of the third century. The achievements of Diocletian, who supposedly stabilized the Empire, ended when he withdrew, and the rebellion of 308–310 demonstrates that there remained unaddressed tensions between the provinces and the remaining tetrarchs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lucius Domitius Alexander</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maxentius</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Africa and the Tetrarchy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constantine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Ancient History</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : de Gruyter, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2019), 1 vom: 11. Juni, Seite 233-250</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ24823594X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2722400-4</subfield><subfield code="x">2324-8114</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:233-250</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:18</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/jah-2018-0017</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">233-250</subfield><subfield code="g">18</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399028 |