Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks
This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives m...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Gu, Xiang [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erschienen: |
De Gruyter ; 2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
23 |
---|
Reproduktion: |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Text & talk - Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006, 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 |
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:36 ; year:2016 ; number:2 ; day:1 ; month:04 ; pages:221-243 ; extent:23 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ248185373 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ248185373 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220820040546.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220814s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/text-2016-0011 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a articles2015-2020.pp |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ248185373 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gu, Xiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks |
264 | 1 | |b De Gruyter |c 2016 | |
300 | |a 23 | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. | ||
533 | |f Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften | ||
650 | 4 | |a history textbook | |
650 | 4 | |a discourse analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a systemic functional linguistics | |
650 | 4 | |a appraisal system | |
650 | 4 | |a evaluation | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Text & talk |d Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 |g 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 |w (DE-627)NLEJ248236865 |w (DE-600)2222555-9 |x 1860-7349 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g day:1 |g month:04 |g pages:221-243 |g extent:23 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a ZDB-1-DGR | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 36 |j 2016 |e 2 |b 1 |c 4 |h 221-243 |g 23 |
author_variant |
x g xg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18607349:2016----::vlainnsnjpnshso |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248185373 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gu, Xiang verfasserin aut Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks De Gruyter 2016 23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation Enthalten in Text & talk Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 (DE-627)NLEJ248236865 (DE-600)2222555-9 1860-7349 nnns volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 36 2016 2 1 4 221-243 23 |
spelling |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248185373 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gu, Xiang verfasserin aut Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks De Gruyter 2016 23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation Enthalten in Text & talk Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 (DE-627)NLEJ248236865 (DE-600)2222555-9 1860-7349 nnns volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 36 2016 2 1 4 221-243 23 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248185373 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gu, Xiang verfasserin aut Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks De Gruyter 2016 23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation Enthalten in Text & talk Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 (DE-627)NLEJ248236865 (DE-600)2222555-9 1860-7349 nnns volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 36 2016 2 1 4 221-243 23 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248185373 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gu, Xiang verfasserin aut Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks De Gruyter 2016 23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation Enthalten in Text & talk Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 (DE-627)NLEJ248236865 (DE-600)2222555-9 1860-7349 nnns volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 36 2016 2 1 4 221-243 23 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 doi articles2015-2020.pp (DE-627)NLEJ248185373 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb Gu, Xiang verfasserin aut Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks De Gruyter 2016 23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation Enthalten in Text & talk Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 (DE-627)NLEJ248236865 (DE-600)2222555-9 1860-7349 nnns volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 Deutschlandweit zugänglich GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 36 2016 2 1 4 221-243 23 |
source |
Enthalten in Text & talk 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Text & talk 36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243 volume:36 year:2016 number:2 day:1 month:04 pages:221-243 extent:23 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Text & talk |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gu, Xiang @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-04-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ248236865 |
id |
NLEJ248185373 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ248185373</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820040546.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/text-2016-0011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ248185373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Xiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">history textbook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">discourse analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">systemic functional linguistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">appraisal system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Text & talk</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236865</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2222555-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1860-7349</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:221-243</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">4</subfield><subfield code="h">221-243</subfield><subfield code="g">23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
series2 |
Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften |
author |
Gu, Xiang |
spellingShingle |
Gu, Xiang misc history textbook misc discourse analysis misc systemic functional linguistics misc appraisal system misc evaluation Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks |
authorStr |
Gu, Xiang |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ248236865 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1860-7349 |
topic_title |
Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks history textbook discourse analysis systemic functional linguistics appraisal system evaluation |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
publisherStr |
De Gruyter |
topic |
misc history textbook misc discourse analysis misc systemic functional linguistics misc appraisal system misc evaluation |
topic_unstemmed |
misc history textbook misc discourse analysis misc systemic functional linguistics misc appraisal system misc evaluation |
topic_browse |
misc history textbook misc discourse analysis misc systemic functional linguistics misc appraisal system misc evaluation |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Text & talk |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ248236865 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Text & talk |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ248236865 (DE-600)2222555-9 |
title |
Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ248185373 |
title_full |
Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks |
author_sort |
Gu, Xiang |
journal |
Text & talk |
journalStr |
Text & talk |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
221 |
author_browse |
Gu, Xiang |
container_volume |
36 |
physical |
23 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Gu, Xiang |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 |
title_sort |
evaluation in us and japanese history textbooks |
title_auth |
Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks |
abstract |
This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. |
abstractGer |
This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U ZDB-1-DGR GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
NLEJ248236865 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1515/text-2016-0011 |
up_date |
2024-07-05T22:52:34.485Z |
_version_ |
1803781358998257664 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ248185373</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220820040546.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220814s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||und c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/text-2016-0011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">articles2015-2020.pp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ248185373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Xiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="b">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper attempts to make a corpus and cross-linguistic study of how the Pacific War is evaluated in US and Japanese history textbooks by drawing upon Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Appraisal System. The global pattern of evaluation in the data is such that the US history textbook gives more value to acts and things, creates an authoritative voice excluding alternative positions, and has a delicate construal for the extent of evaluation. By contrast, the Japanese history textbook displays a subjective affective stance and a flagged authorial voice strengthened by alternative positions. A detailed discourse analysis of the lexicogrammar in the Pacific War narratives of the US and Japanese history textbooks further shows different evaluation orientations for the construal of images of the United States and Japan. The US history textbook characterizes the United States as a state of military power and high morality for its military operations in the Pacific War while censuring Japan’s cruelty of attack, whereas the Japanese history textbook highlights Japan’s tenacity and voluntary acts on the battlefield while condemning the United States for its immorality of bombing.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="f">Walter de Gruyter Online Zeitschriften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">history textbook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">discourse analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">systemic functional linguistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">appraisal system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Text & talk</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2016), 2 vom: 1. Apr., Seite 221-243</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ248236865</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2222555-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1860-7349</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:221-243</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0011</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-DGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">4</subfield><subfield code="h">221-243</subfield><subfield code="g">23</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3996477 |