Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software : A Comparative Study
The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Nikolaidou, Mara [verfasserIn] Pyrounakis, George [verfasserIn] Hatzopoulos, Michael [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
1 Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of digital library systems - Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010, 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:4 ; year:2014 ; number:1 ; pages:10-24 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ251796914 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ251796914 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231205143851.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231128s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ251796914 | ||
| 035 | |a (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nikolaidou, Mara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software |b A Comparative Study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria | ||
| 653 | |a Digital Collection |a Digital Library (DL) |a DSpace |a EPrints |a Fedora |a Greenstone |a Invenio |a Open-Source Software |a Repository | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Pyrounakis, George |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hatzopoulos, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of digital library systems |d Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 |g 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ244418853 |w (DE-600)2703226-7 |x 1947-9085 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g pages:10-24 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 |m X:IGIG |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true |3 Abstract |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-GIS | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2014 |e 1 |h 10-24 | ||
| author_variant |
m n mn g p gp m h mh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:19479085:2014----::uligiiacletossnoesucdgtl |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251796914 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nikolaidou, Mara verfasserin aut Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria Digital Collection Digital Library (DL) DSpace EPrints Fedora Greenstone Invenio Open-Source Software Repository Pyrounakis, George verfasserin aut Hatzopoulos, Michael verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418853 (DE-600)2703226-7 1947-9085 nnns volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2014 1 10-24 |
| spelling |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251796914 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nikolaidou, Mara verfasserin aut Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria Digital Collection Digital Library (DL) DSpace EPrints Fedora Greenstone Invenio Open-Source Software Repository Pyrounakis, George verfasserin aut Hatzopoulos, Michael verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418853 (DE-600)2703226-7 1947-9085 nnns volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2014 1 10-24 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251796914 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nikolaidou, Mara verfasserin aut Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria Digital Collection Digital Library (DL) DSpace EPrints Fedora Greenstone Invenio Open-Source Software Repository Pyrounakis, George verfasserin aut Hatzopoulos, Michael verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418853 (DE-600)2703226-7 1947-9085 nnns volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2014 1 10-24 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251796914 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nikolaidou, Mara verfasserin aut Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria Digital Collection Digital Library (DL) DSpace EPrints Fedora Greenstone Invenio Open-Source Software Repository Pyrounakis, George verfasserin aut Hatzopoulos, Michael verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418853 (DE-600)2703226-7 1947-9085 nnns volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2014 1 10-24 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251796914 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Nikolaidou, Mara verfasserin aut Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria Digital Collection Digital Library (DL) DSpace EPrints Fedora Greenstone Invenio Open-Source Software Repository Pyrounakis, George verfasserin aut Hatzopoulos, Michael verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418853 (DE-600)2703226-7 1947-9085 nnns volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 2014 1 10-24 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of digital library systems 4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24 volume:4 year:2014 number:1 pages:10-24 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Digital Collection Digital Library (DL) DSpace EPrints Fedora Greenstone Invenio Open-Source Software Repository |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of digital library systems |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Nikolaidou, Mara @@aut@@ Pyrounakis, George @@aut@@ Hatzopoulos, Michael @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ244418853 |
| id |
NLEJ251796914 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ251796914</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231205143851.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231128s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/ijdls.2014010102</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ251796914</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nikolaidou, Mara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software</subfield><subfield code="b">A Comparative Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Digital Collection</subfield><subfield code="a">Digital Library (DL)</subfield><subfield code="a">DSpace</subfield><subfield code="a">EPrints</subfield><subfield code="a">Fedora</subfield><subfield code="a">Greenstone</subfield><subfield code="a">Invenio</subfield><subfield code="a">Open-Source Software</subfield><subfield code="a">Repository</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pyrounakis, George</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hatzopoulos, Michael</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of digital library systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244418853</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703226-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1947-9085</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:10-24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">10-24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Nikolaidou, Mara |
| spellingShingle |
Nikolaidou, Mara misc Digital Collection Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study |
| authorStr |
Nikolaidou, Mara |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ244418853 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1947-9085 |
| topic_title |
Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study |
| topic |
misc Digital Collection |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Digital Collection |
| topic_browse |
misc Digital Collection |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of digital library systems |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ244418853 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of digital library systems |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ244418853 (DE-600)2703226-7 |
| title |
Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ251796914 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 |
| title_full |
Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study |
| author_sort |
Nikolaidou, Mara |
| journal |
International journal of digital library systems |
| journalStr |
International journal of digital library systems |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
10 |
| author_browse |
Nikolaidou, Mara Pyrounakis, George Hatzopoulos, Michael |
| container_volume |
4 |
| physical |
1 Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Nikolaidou, Mara |
| title_sub |
A Comparative Study |
| doi_str_mv |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
building digital collections using open source digital repository softwarea comparative study |
| title_auth |
Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software A Comparative Study |
| abstract |
The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria |
| abstractGer |
The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria |
| collection_details |
ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software |
| url |
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Pyrounakis, George Hatzopoulos, Michael |
| author2Str |
Pyrounakis, George Hatzopoulos, Michael |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ244418853 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.4018/ijdls.2014010102 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T11:37:59.091Z |
| _version_ |
1803829514434772992 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ251796914</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231205143851.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231128s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/ijdls.2014010102</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ251796914</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/ijdls.2014010102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nikolaidou, Mara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Building Digital Collections Using Open Source Digital Repository Software</subfield><subfield code="b">A Comparative Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The last decade a great number of digital library and digital repository systems have been developed and published as open-source software. The variety of available software systems is a factor of confusion when an organization is planning to build a repository infrastructure to host its collections. To simplify the decision process five widely used open-source repository software systems are compared, namely DSpace, Fedora, Greenstone, EPrints and Invenio. In addition to the comparison of these software systems and their characteristics' description, the authors propose the most suitable systems for different cases of digital collections. Using five collection paradigms that represent case studies of different content and functionality, an organization can be directed to select a repository software matching its criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Digital Collection</subfield><subfield code="a">Digital Library (DL)</subfield><subfield code="a">DSpace</subfield><subfield code="a">EPrints</subfield><subfield code="a">Fedora</subfield><subfield code="a">Greenstone</subfield><subfield code="a">Invenio</subfield><subfield code="a">Open-Source Software</subfield><subfield code="a">Repository</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pyrounakis, George</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hatzopoulos, Michael</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of digital library systems</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2014), 1, Seite 10-24</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244418853</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703226-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1947-9085</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:10-24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdls.2014010102&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">10-24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401515 |