Design Review Process : Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication?
Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. [verfasserIn] Levy, Richard M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Umfang: |
1 Online-Ressource |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of e-planning research - Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012, 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2014 ; number:4 ; pages:23-39 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ251803287 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ251803287 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231205143905.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231128s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ251803287 | ||
| 035 | |a (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vishkaie, Rojin S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design Review Process |b Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process | ||
| 653 | |a Design Review Process |a Ethnographic Studies |a Participatory Communication |a Technology |a Visualization | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Levy, Richard M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of e-planning research |d Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012 |g 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ244418969 |w (DE-600)2703278-4 |x 2160-9926 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2014 |g number:4 |g pages:23-39 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 |m X:IGIG |x Verlag |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true |3 Abstract |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-GIS | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 2014 |e 4 |h 23-39 | ||
| author_variant |
r s v rs rsv r m l rm rml |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:21609926:2014----::eineiw |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251803287 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vishkaie, Rojin S. verfasserin aut Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process Design Review Process Ethnographic Studies Participatory Communication Technology Visualization Levy, Richard M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418969 (DE-600)2703278-4 2160-9926 nnns volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2014 4 23-39 |
| spelling |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251803287 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vishkaie, Rojin S. verfasserin aut Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process Design Review Process Ethnographic Studies Participatory Communication Technology Visualization Levy, Richard M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418969 (DE-600)2703278-4 2160-9926 nnns volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2014 4 23-39 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251803287 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vishkaie, Rojin S. verfasserin aut Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process Design Review Process Ethnographic Studies Participatory Communication Technology Visualization Levy, Richard M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418969 (DE-600)2703278-4 2160-9926 nnns volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2014 4 23-39 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251803287 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vishkaie, Rojin S. verfasserin aut Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process Design Review Process Ethnographic Studies Participatory Communication Technology Visualization Levy, Richard M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418969 (DE-600)2703278-4 2160-9926 nnns volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2014 4 23-39 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251803287 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vishkaie, Rojin S. verfasserin aut Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? 2014 1 Online-Ressource Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process Design Review Process Ethnographic Studies Participatory Communication Technology Visualization Levy, Richard M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ244418969 (DE-600)2703278-4 2160-9926 nnns volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 X:IGIG Verlag Deutschlandweit zugänglich http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true Abstract ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 2014 4 23-39 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of e-planning research 3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39 volume:3 year:2014 number:4 pages:23-39 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Design Review Process Ethnographic Studies Participatory Communication Technology Visualization |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of e-planning research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. @@aut@@ Levy, Richard M. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ244418969 |
| id |
NLEJ251803287 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ251803287</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231205143905.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231128s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/ijepr.2014100102</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ251803287</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vishkaie, Rojin S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design Review Process</subfield><subfield code="b">Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Design Review Process</subfield><subfield code="a">Ethnographic Studies</subfield><subfield code="a">Participatory Communication</subfield><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield><subfield code="a">Visualization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levy, Richard M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of e-planning research</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244418969</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703278-4</subfield><subfield code="x">2160-9926</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23-39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">23-39</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. |
| spellingShingle |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. misc Design Review Process Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| authorStr |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ244418969 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2160-9926 |
| topic_title |
Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| topic |
misc Design Review Process |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Design Review Process |
| topic_browse |
misc Design Review Process |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of e-planning research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ244418969 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of e-planning research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ244418969 (DE-600)2703278-4 |
| title |
Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ251803287 (VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 |
| title_full |
Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| author_sort |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. |
| journal |
International journal of e-planning research |
| journalStr |
International journal of e-planning research |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
23 |
| author_browse |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. Levy, Richard M. |
| container_volume |
3 |
| physical |
1 Online-Ressource |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Vishkaie, Rojin S. |
| title_sub |
Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| doi_str_mv |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
design review processcan new technology improve the art of participatory communication? |
| title_auth |
Design Review Process Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication? |
| abstract |
Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process |
| abstractGer |
Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process |
| collection_details |
ZDB-1-GIS GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Design Review Process |
| url |
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Levy, Richard M. |
| author2Str |
Levy, Richard M. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ244418969 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.4018/ijepr.2014100102 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T11:39:05.906Z |
| _version_ |
1803829584494329856 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ251803287</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231205143905.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231128s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.4018/ijepr.2014100102</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ251803287</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(VZGNL)10.4018/ijepr.2014100102</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vishkaie, Rojin S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design Review Process</subfield><subfield code="b">Can New Technology Improve the Art of Participatory Communication?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Urban planners play an important role, communicate plans with developers on behalf of the city and its inhabitants. They also function as shepherds for a developer's development application, communicating with civic technicians, who ensure adherence to bylaws, civic committees, and the public. As a communication proxy between all these different stakeholders, urban planners often find themselves at the center of miscommunications, often due to assumptions and discussions made over paper-based sketches. This study employs interviews and observations with twelve urban planners from a major Canadian city to investigate the communication challenges around technical activities of the design review process, also to explore tools and technologies that are used within the design review process. Thus, the goal of this study is to arrive at a set of design recommendations to create a mobile, interactive communication medium that can potentially support the participatory communication and technical activities of the design review process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Design Review Process</subfield><subfield code="a">Ethnographic Studies</subfield><subfield code="a">Participatory Communication</subfield><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield><subfield code="a">Visualization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levy, Richard M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of e-planning research</subfield><subfield code="d">Hershey, Pa : IGI Global, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2014), 4, Seite 23-39</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ244418969</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2703278-4</subfield><subfield code="x">2160-9926</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23-39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102</subfield><subfield code="m">X:IGIG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijepr.2014100102&buylink=true</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-GIS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">23-39</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013557 |