The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change?
Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widesprea...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Martin, Paul [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Australian psychologist - London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966, 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
number:1 ; volume:24 ; year:1989 ; month:03 ; day:01 ; pages:71-92 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/00050068908259551 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ251996247 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ251996247 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231206141059.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/00050068908259551 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ251996247 | ||
| 035 | |a (TFO)782647467 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Martin, Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Australian psychologist |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966 |g 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ251990257 |w (DE-600)2135329-3 |w (DE-576)273874780 |x 1742-9544 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g number:1 |g volume:24 |g year:1989 |g month:03 |g day:01 |g pages:71-92 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 |x Digitalisierung |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-TFO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |e 1 |d 24 |j 1989 |c 3 |b 01 |h 71-92 | ||
| author_variant |
p m pm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:17429544:2011----::hsinitrciinroeadlnclsc |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1080/00050068908259551 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251996247 (TFO)782647467 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Martin, Paul verfasserin aut The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. Enthalten in Australian psychologist London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ251990257 (DE-600)2135329-3 (DE-576)273874780 1742-9544 nnns number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 24 1989 3 01 71-92 |
| spelling |
10.1080/00050068908259551 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251996247 (TFO)782647467 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Martin, Paul verfasserin aut The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. Enthalten in Australian psychologist London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ251990257 (DE-600)2135329-3 (DE-576)273874780 1742-9544 nnns number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 24 1989 3 01 71-92 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/00050068908259551 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251996247 (TFO)782647467 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Martin, Paul verfasserin aut The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. Enthalten in Australian psychologist London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ251990257 (DE-600)2135329-3 (DE-576)273874780 1742-9544 nnns number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 24 1989 3 01 71-92 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/00050068908259551 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251996247 (TFO)782647467 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Martin, Paul verfasserin aut The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. Enthalten in Australian psychologist London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ251990257 (DE-600)2135329-3 (DE-576)273874780 1742-9544 nnns number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 24 1989 3 01 71-92 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/00050068908259551 doi (DE-627)NLEJ251996247 (TFO)782647467 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Martin, Paul verfasserin aut The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. Enthalten in Australian psychologist London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ251990257 (DE-600)2135329-3 (DE-576)273874780 1742-9544 nnns number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 1 24 1989 3 01 71-92 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Australian psychologist 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Australian psychologist 24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92 number:1 volume:24 year:1989 month:03 day:01 pages:71-92 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Australian psychologist |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Martin, Paul @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1989-03-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ251990257 |
| id |
NLEJ251996247 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ251996247</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206141059.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00050068908259551</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ251996247</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)782647467</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin, Paul</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Australian psychologist</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ251990257</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2135329-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)273874780</subfield><subfield code="x">1742-9544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1989</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:71-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">1989</subfield><subfield code="c">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">71-92</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Martin, Paul |
| spellingShingle |
Martin, Paul The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| authorStr |
Martin, Paul |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ251990257 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1742-9544 |
| topic_title |
The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Australian psychologist |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ251990257 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Australian psychologist |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ251990257 (DE-600)2135329-3 (DE-576)273874780 |
| title |
The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ251996247 (TFO)782647467 |
| title_full |
The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| author_sort |
Martin, Paul |
| journal |
Australian psychologist |
| journalStr |
Australian psychologist |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
71 |
| author_browse |
Martin, Paul |
| container_volume |
24 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Martin, Paul |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/00050068908259551 |
| title_sort |
the scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: time for change? |
| title_auth |
The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| abstract |
Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. |
| abstractGer |
Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur. |
| collection_details |
ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change? |
| url |
https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ251990257 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1080/00050068908259551 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T12:02:17.957Z |
| _version_ |
1803831044166647808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ251996247</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206141059.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/00050068908259551</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ251996247</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)782647467</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin, Paul</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The scientist-practitioner model and clinical psychology: Time for change?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Four complementary studies explored the current status of the scientist-practitioner model; the degree to which clinical psychologists engaged in research consumption, research activity, and publication; and attitudes to research and training. The results showed that the model still enjoys widespread support, but contrary to the model, most clinical psychologists do not engage in research let alone publish findings. They appear to monitor research findings but whether this influences their practice is debatable. Clinical psychologists report that they would like to do more research but perceive time pressures and lack of funding as the major obstacles. A number of recommendations for change were made, including the following: University clinical courses should shift the focus of their research training to methodologies which are more clinically relevant and more compatible “with clinical settings; employing agencies should give a higher priority to research; and more collaboration between psychologists in academic and applied settings should occur.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Australian psychologist</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">24(1989), 1 vom: 01. März, Seite 71-92</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ251990257</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2135329-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)273874780</subfield><subfield code="x">1742-9544</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1989</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:71-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ad35cffe700395eb08d00b888b6def9762dc2abb3</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">1989</subfield><subfield code="c">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">71-92</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4014235 |