On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory
In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-la...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Rapp, Brenda [verfasserIn] Caramazza, Alfonso [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2011 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Cognitive neuropsychology - London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984, 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
number:2 ; volume:10 ; year:1993 ; month:03 ; day:01 ; pages:113-141 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1080/02643299308253458 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ25270083X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLEJ25270083X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231206142954.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/02643299308253458 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ25270083X | ||
035 | |a (TFO)781386967 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rapp, Brenda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Caramazza, Alfonso |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cognitive neuropsychology |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984 |g 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ252700783 |w (DE-600)1475589-0 |w (DE-576)077885805 |x 1464-0627 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g number:2 |g volume:10 |g year:1993 |g month:03 |g day:01 |g pages:113-141 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 |x Digitalisierung |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
912 | |a ZDB-1-TFO | ||
912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |e 2 |d 10 |j 1993 |c 3 |b 01 |h 113-141 |
author_variant |
b r br a c ac |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14640627:2011----::nhdsicinewedfctoacsadeiisftr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
publishDate |
2011 |
allfields |
10.1080/02643299308253458 doi (DE-627)NLEJ25270083X (TFO)781386967 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Rapp, Brenda verfasserin aut On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. Caramazza, Alfonso verfasserin aut Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252700783 (DE-600)1475589-0 (DE-576)077885805 1464-0627 nnns number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 10 1993 3 01 113-141 |
spelling |
10.1080/02643299308253458 doi (DE-627)NLEJ25270083X (TFO)781386967 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Rapp, Brenda verfasserin aut On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. Caramazza, Alfonso verfasserin aut Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252700783 (DE-600)1475589-0 (DE-576)077885805 1464-0627 nnns number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 10 1993 3 01 113-141 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/02643299308253458 doi (DE-627)NLEJ25270083X (TFO)781386967 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Rapp, Brenda verfasserin aut On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. Caramazza, Alfonso verfasserin aut Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252700783 (DE-600)1475589-0 (DE-576)077885805 1464-0627 nnns number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 10 1993 3 01 113-141 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1080/02643299308253458 doi (DE-627)NLEJ25270083X (TFO)781386967 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Rapp, Brenda verfasserin aut On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. Caramazza, Alfonso verfasserin aut Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252700783 (DE-600)1475589-0 (DE-576)077885805 1464-0627 nnns number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 10 1993 3 01 113-141 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1080/02643299308253458 doi (DE-627)NLEJ25270083X (TFO)781386967 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Rapp, Brenda verfasserin aut On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. Caramazza, Alfonso verfasserin aut Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252700783 (DE-600)1475589-0 (DE-576)077885805 1464-0627 nnns number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 2 10 1993 3 01 113-141 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Cognitive neuropsychology 10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141 number:2 volume:10 year:1993 month:03 day:01 pages:113-141 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Cognitive neuropsychology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Rapp, Brenda @@aut@@ Caramazza, Alfonso @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1993-03-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ252700783 |
id |
NLEJ25270083X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ25270083X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206142954.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/02643299308253458</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ25270083X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)781386967</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rapp, Brenda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caramazza, Alfonso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Cognitive neuropsychology</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ252700783</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1475589-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)077885805</subfield><subfield code="x">1464-0627</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1993</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:113-141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">1993</subfield><subfield code="c">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">113-141</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Rapp, Brenda |
spellingShingle |
Rapp, Brenda On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
authorStr |
Rapp, Brenda |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ252700783 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
NL |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1464-0627 |
topic_title |
On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Cognitive neuropsychology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ252700783 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Cognitive neuropsychology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ252700783 (DE-600)1475589-0 (DE-576)077885805 |
title |
On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ25270083X (TFO)781386967 |
title_full |
On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
author_sort |
Rapp, Brenda |
journal |
Cognitive neuropsychology |
journalStr |
Cognitive neuropsychology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2011 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
113 |
author_browse |
Rapp, Brenda Caramazza, Alfonso |
container_volume |
10 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Rapp, Brenda |
doi_str_mv |
10.1080/02643299308253458 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
on the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: a question of theory |
title_auth |
On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
abstract |
In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. |
abstractGer |
In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. |
abstract_unstemmed |
In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented. |
collection_details |
ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory |
url |
https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Caramazza, Alfonso |
author2Str |
Caramazza, Alfonso |
ppnlink |
NLEJ252700783 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1080/02643299308253458 |
up_date |
2024-07-05T21:28:36.705Z |
_version_ |
1803776076500959232 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ25270083X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206142954.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/02643299308253458</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ25270083X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)781386967</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rapp, Brenda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper we discuss some aspects of the role of theory in cognitive neuropsychological research. We will consider, in particular, the nature of performance criteria used in classifying patients with acquired cognitive disorders, and we will argue that all such criteria are necessarily theory-laden. This issue will be discussed in the specific context of the putative distinction between patients with access vs. storage deficits (Warrington & Shallice, 1979). We will conclude that although the theoretical distinction between access and storage is potentially an exciting and useful one, the phononema that have been reported are far from compelling. Furthermore, and more importantly, we will argue that the proposal is not supra-theoretical in scope as has been claimed, but rather that its evaluation and verification rely crucially in the theoretical framework within which it is presented.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caramazza, Alfonso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Cognitive neuropsychology</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">10(1993), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 113-141</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ252700783</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1475589-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)077885805</subfield><subfield code="x">1464-0627</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1993</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:113-141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3Ab459beb7a7e56487a8588eaee9614e421eb0eb55</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">1993</subfield><subfield code="c">3</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">113-141</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4012985 |