Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation
Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wilson, John [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Work & stress - London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987, 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
number:4 ; volume:1 ; year:1987 ; month:10 ; day:01 ; pages:385-395 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/02678378708258529 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ252765842 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ252765842 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231206143202.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/02678378708258529 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ252765842 | ||
| 035 | |a (TFO)782441613 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wilson, John |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Work & stress |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987 |g 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ252763602 |w (DE-600)1485108-8 |w (DE-576)079598781 |x 1464-5335 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g number:4 |g volume:1 |g year:1987 |g month:10 |g day:01 |g pages:385-395 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff |x Digitalisierung |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-TFO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |e 4 |d 1 |j 1987 |c 10 |b 01 |h 385-395 | ||
| author_variant |
j w jw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14645335:2011----::hsattdsohcapcsfokroleifr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1080/02678378708258529 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252765842 (TFO)782441613 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Wilson, John verfasserin aut Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). Enthalten in Work & stress London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252763602 (DE-600)1485108-8 (DE-576)079598781 1464-5335 nnns number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 1 1987 10 01 385-395 |
| spelling |
10.1080/02678378708258529 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252765842 (TFO)782441613 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Wilson, John verfasserin aut Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). Enthalten in Work & stress London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252763602 (DE-600)1485108-8 (DE-576)079598781 1464-5335 nnns number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 1 1987 10 01 385-395 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/02678378708258529 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252765842 (TFO)782441613 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Wilson, John verfasserin aut Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). Enthalten in Work & stress London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252763602 (DE-600)1485108-8 (DE-576)079598781 1464-5335 nnns number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 1 1987 10 01 385-395 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/02678378708258529 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252765842 (TFO)782441613 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Wilson, John verfasserin aut Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). Enthalten in Work & stress London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252763602 (DE-600)1485108-8 (DE-576)079598781 1464-5335 nnns number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 1 1987 10 01 385-395 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/02678378708258529 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252765842 (TFO)782441613 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Wilson, John verfasserin aut Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). Enthalten in Work & stress London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252763602 (DE-600)1485108-8 (DE-576)079598781 1464-5335 nnns number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 4 1 1987 10 01 385-395 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Work & stress 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Work & stress 1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395 number:4 volume:1 year:1987 month:10 day:01 pages:385-395 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Work & stress |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wilson, John @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1987-10-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ252763602 |
| id |
NLEJ252765842 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ252765842</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206143202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/02678378708258529</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ252765842</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)782441613</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilson, John</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Work & stress</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ252763602</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1485108-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)079598781</subfield><subfield code="x">1464-5335</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1987</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:385-395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">1987</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">385-395</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wilson, John |
| spellingShingle |
Wilson, John Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| authorStr |
Wilson, John |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ252763602 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1464-5335 |
| topic_title |
Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Work & stress |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ252763602 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Work & stress |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ252763602 (DE-600)1485108-8 (DE-576)079598781 |
| title |
Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ252765842 (TFO)782441613 |
| title_full |
Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| author_sort |
Wilson, John |
| journal |
Work & stress |
| journalStr |
Work & stress |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
385 |
| author_browse |
Wilson, John |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wilson, John |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/02678378708258529 |
| title_sort |
whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or cool media for high participation |
| title_auth |
Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| abstract |
Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). |
| abstractGer |
Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23). |
| collection_details |
ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation |
| url |
https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ252763602 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1080/02678378708258529 |
| up_date |
2024-07-05T21:45:25.587Z |
| _version_ |
1803777134389362688 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ252765842</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206143202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/02678378708258529</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ252765842</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)782441613</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilson, John</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Whose attitudes to which aspects of work? or Cool media for high participation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Current approaches to the assessment of job attitudes—for use in job redesign—seem to centre upon the importance of job characteristics, such as those within the Job Characteristics Model. Data collection is largely through well-founded, repeatable, formal questionnaires. It is argued that a broader, ergonomics perspective is required, stressing the importance of job holders' attitudes to the technology being used, the physical environment and workplace, and procedures in support of work, such as training. Furthermore, if we wish to promote the participation of those whose work is being redesigned, the traditional and scientifically respectable questionnaire may not be the correct instrument. Data gathered by means of informal semi-structured discussion may better reflect the concerns and priorities of the people doing the work. Perhaps, to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, formal job attitude instruments used alone are 'hot media', in the sense of being well-filled with data but low in participation. Informal discussion methods could be seen then as a 'cool medium', high in participation or completion by the audience (McLuhan 1964, pp. 22-23).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Work & stress</subfield><subfield code="d">London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">1(1987), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 385-395</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ252763602</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1485108-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)079598781</subfield><subfield code="x">1464-5335</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1987</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:385-395</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A1850efb3d6870da94080d3ddbe8861e15dfe90ff</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">1987</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">385-395</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398946 |