Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer
Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently t...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Powell, R. M. [verfasserIn] Callaway, R. W. [verfasserIn] Michalowski, J. T. [verfasserIn] Vandegrift, S. A. [verfasserIn] White, M. V. [verfasserIn] Kampbell, D. H. [verfasserIn] Bledsoe, B. E. [verfasserIn] Wilson, J. T. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2011 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of environmental analytical chemistry - London : Taylor & Francis, 1971, 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
number:3 ; volume:34 ; year:1988 ; month:11 ; day:01 ; pages:253-263 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/03067319808026842 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
NLEJ252850750 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLEJ252850750 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231206143449.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/03067319808026842 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLEJ252850750 | ||
| 035 | |a (TFO)756792212 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Powell, R. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Callaway, R. W. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Michalowski, J. T. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vandegrift, S. A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a White, M. V. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kampbell, D. H. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bledsoe, B. E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wilson, J. T. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of environmental analytical chemistry |d London : Taylor & Francis, 1971 |g 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)NLEJ252843355 |w (DE-600)2038320-4 |w (DE-576)263253945 |x 1029-0397 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g number:3 |g volume:34 |g year:1988 |g month:11 |g day:01 |g pages:253-263 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d |x Digitalisierung |z Deutschlandweit zugänglich |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-TFO | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NL_ARTICLE | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |e 3 |d 34 |j 1988 |c 11 |b 01 |h 253-263 | ||
| author_variant |
r m p rm rmp r w c rw rwc j t m jt jtm s a v sa sav m v w mv mvw d h k dh dhk b e b be beb j t w jt jtw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10290397:2011----::oprsnfehdtdtriexgneadoboeeitooa |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2011 |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| allfields |
10.1080/03067319808026842 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252850750 (TFO)756792212 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Powell, R. M. verfasserin aut Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. Callaway, R. W. verfasserin aut Michalowski, J. T. verfasserin aut Vandegrift, S. A. verfasserin aut White, M. V. verfasserin aut Kampbell, D. H. verfasserin aut Bledsoe, B. E. verfasserin aut Wilson, J. T. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry London : Taylor & Francis, 1971 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252843355 (DE-600)2038320-4 (DE-576)263253945 1029-0397 nnns number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 34 1988 11 01 253-263 |
| spelling |
10.1080/03067319808026842 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252850750 (TFO)756792212 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Powell, R. M. verfasserin aut Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. Callaway, R. W. verfasserin aut Michalowski, J. T. verfasserin aut Vandegrift, S. A. verfasserin aut White, M. V. verfasserin aut Kampbell, D. H. verfasserin aut Bledsoe, B. E. verfasserin aut Wilson, J. T. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry London : Taylor & Francis, 1971 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252843355 (DE-600)2038320-4 (DE-576)263253945 1029-0397 nnns number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 34 1988 11 01 253-263 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/03067319808026842 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252850750 (TFO)756792212 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Powell, R. M. verfasserin aut Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. Callaway, R. W. verfasserin aut Michalowski, J. T. verfasserin aut Vandegrift, S. A. verfasserin aut White, M. V. verfasserin aut Kampbell, D. H. verfasserin aut Bledsoe, B. E. verfasserin aut Wilson, J. T. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry London : Taylor & Francis, 1971 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252843355 (DE-600)2038320-4 (DE-576)263253945 1029-0397 nnns number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 34 1988 11 01 253-263 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/03067319808026842 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252850750 (TFO)756792212 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Powell, R. M. verfasserin aut Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. Callaway, R. W. verfasserin aut Michalowski, J. T. verfasserin aut Vandegrift, S. A. verfasserin aut White, M. V. verfasserin aut Kampbell, D. H. verfasserin aut Bledsoe, B. E. verfasserin aut Wilson, J. T. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry London : Taylor & Francis, 1971 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252843355 (DE-600)2038320-4 (DE-576)263253945 1029-0397 nnns number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 34 1988 11 01 253-263 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/03067319808026842 doi (DE-627)NLEJ252850750 (TFO)756792212 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng Powell, R. M. verfasserin aut Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. Callaway, R. W. verfasserin aut Michalowski, J. T. verfasserin aut Vandegrift, S. A. verfasserin aut White, M. V. verfasserin aut Kampbell, D. H. verfasserin aut Bledsoe, B. E. verfasserin aut Wilson, J. T. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry London : Taylor & Francis, 1971 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 Online-Ressource (DE-627)NLEJ252843355 (DE-600)2038320-4 (DE-576)263253945 1029-0397 nnns number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d Digitalisierung Deutschlandweit zugänglich ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE AR 3 34 1988 11 01 253-263 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of environmental analytical chemistry 34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263 number:3 volume:34 year:1988 month:11 day:01 pages:253-263 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International journal of environmental analytical chemistry |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Powell, R. M. @@aut@@ Callaway, R. W. @@aut@@ Michalowski, J. T. @@aut@@ Vandegrift, S. A. @@aut@@ White, M. V. @@aut@@ Kampbell, D. H. @@aut@@ Bledsoe, B. E. @@aut@@ Wilson, J. T. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1988-11-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
NLEJ252843355 |
| id |
NLEJ252850750 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ252850750</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206143449.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/03067319808026842</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ252850750</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)756792212</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Powell, R. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Callaway, R. W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michalowski, J. T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vandegrift, S. A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">White, M. V.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kampbell, D. H.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bledsoe, B. E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilson, J. T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of environmental analytical chemistry</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ252843355</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2038320-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)263253945</subfield><subfield code="x">1029-0397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:34</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:253-263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="d">34</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">253-263</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Powell, R. M. |
| spellingShingle |
Powell, R. M. Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| authorStr |
Powell, R. M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)NLEJ252843355 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
NL |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1029-0397 |
| topic_title |
Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of environmental analytical chemistry |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
NLEJ252843355 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of environmental analytical chemistry |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)NLEJ252843355 (DE-600)2038320-4 (DE-576)263253945 |
| title |
Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)NLEJ252850750 (TFO)756792212 |
| title_full |
Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| author_sort |
Powell, R. M. |
| journal |
International journal of environmental analytical chemistry |
| journalStr |
International journal of environmental analytical chemistry |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2011 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
253 |
| author_browse |
Powell, R. M. Callaway, R. W. Michalowski, J. T. Vandegrift, S. A. White, M. V. Kampbell, D. H. Bledsoe, B. E. Wilson, J. T. |
| container_volume |
34 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Powell, R. M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/03067319808026842 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
comparison of methods to determine oxygen demand for bioremediation of a fuel contaminated aquifer |
| title_auth |
Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| abstract |
Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. |
| abstractGer |
Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data. |
| collection_details |
ZDB-1-TFO GBV_NL_ARTICLE |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer |
| url |
https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Callaway, R. W. Michalowski, J. T. Vandegrift, S. A. White, M. V. Kampbell, D. H. Bledsoe, B. E. Wilson, J. T. |
| author2Str |
Callaway, R. W. Michalowski, J. T. Vandegrift, S. A. White, M. V. Kampbell, D. H. Bledsoe, B. E. Wilson, J. T. |
| ppnlink |
NLEJ252843355 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1080/03067319808026842 |
| up_date |
2024-07-05T22:03:24.149Z |
| _version_ |
1803778265343590400 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">NLEJ252850750</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231206143449.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231206s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/03067319808026842</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)NLEJ252850750</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(TFO)756792212</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Powell, R. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Methods to Determine Oxygen Demand for Bioremediation of a Fuel Contaminated Aquifer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Four analytical methods were compared for estimating concentrations of fuel contaminants in subsurface core samples. The methods were total organic carbon, chemical oxygen demand, oil and grease, and a solvent extraction of fuel hydrocarbons combined with a gas chromatographic technique. Presently the most applicable and convenient technique for our purposes, based on greatest apparent contaminant recovery, is the solvent extraction gas chromatographic method. Sample heterogeneity and opportunity for losses due to contaminant volatility require consideration during sample handling, analysis, and when interpreting analytical data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Callaway, R. W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michalowski, J. T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vandegrift, S. A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">White, M. V.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kampbell, D. H.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bledsoe, B. E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilson, J. T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of environmental analytical chemistry</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Taylor & Francis, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">34(1988), 3 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 253-263</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)NLEJ252843355</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2038320-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)263253945</subfield><subfield code="x">1029-0397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">volume:34</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:253-263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/tandf%3A08ef0b3fb70336c5be3413c466755c561471d92d</subfield><subfield code="x">Digitalisierung</subfield><subfield code="z">Deutschlandweit zugänglich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-TFO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_NL_ARTICLE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="d">34</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="h">253-263</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3998165 |