Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications
Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Xinwei Zhang [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B - London : Inst., 1983, 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:229 ; year:2015 ; number:11 ; pages:2035 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1956554831 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1956554831 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220217081447.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1956554831 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 52.70 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Xinwei Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Simulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Engineering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aircraft | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Specifications | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Hakki Eres |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Claude Baron |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Guillaume Auriol |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mario Kossmann |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B |d London : Inst., 1983 |g 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 |w (DE-627)130863106 |w (DE-600)1030835-0 |w (DE-576)023106425 |x 0954-4054 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:229 |g year:2015 |g number:11 |g pages:2035 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 52.70 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 229 |j 2015 |e 11 |h 2035 | ||
| author_variant |
x z xz |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:09544054:2015----::elcntrestigyaumdliteosoqaiyovleaer |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
52.70 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1956554831 (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 DNB 52.70 bkl Xinwei Zhang verfasserin aut Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications Hakki Eres oth Claude Baron oth Guillaume Auriol oth Mario Kossmann oth Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B London : Inst., 1983 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 (DE-627)130863106 (DE-600)1030835-0 (DE-576)023106425 0954-4054 nnns volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4046 52.70 AVZ AR 229 2015 11 2035 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1956554831 (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 DNB 52.70 bkl Xinwei Zhang verfasserin aut Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications Hakki Eres oth Claude Baron oth Guillaume Auriol oth Mario Kossmann oth Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B London : Inst., 1983 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 (DE-627)130863106 (DE-600)1030835-0 (DE-576)023106425 0954-4054 nnns volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4046 52.70 AVZ AR 229 2015 11 2035 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1956554831 (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 DNB 52.70 bkl Xinwei Zhang verfasserin aut Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications Hakki Eres oth Claude Baron oth Guillaume Auriol oth Mario Kossmann oth Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B London : Inst., 1983 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 (DE-627)130863106 (DE-600)1030835-0 (DE-576)023106425 0954-4054 nnns volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4046 52.70 AVZ AR 229 2015 11 2035 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1956554831 (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 DNB 52.70 bkl Xinwei Zhang verfasserin aut Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications Hakki Eres oth Claude Baron oth Guillaume Auriol oth Mario Kossmann oth Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B London : Inst., 1983 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 (DE-627)130863106 (DE-600)1030835-0 (DE-576)023106425 0954-4054 nnns volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4046 52.70 AVZ AR 229 2015 11 2035 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1956554831 (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 DNB 52.70 bkl Xinwei Zhang verfasserin aut Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications Hakki Eres oth Claude Baron oth Guillaume Auriol oth Mario Kossmann oth Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B London : Inst., 1983 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 (DE-627)130863106 (DE-600)1030835-0 (DE-576)023106425 0954-4054 nnns volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4046 52.70 AVZ AR 229 2015 11 2035 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B 229(2015), 11, Seite 2035 volume:229 year:2015 number:11 pages:2035 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications |
| dewey-raw |
620 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Xinwei Zhang @@aut@@ Hakki Eres @@oth@@ Claude Baron @@oth@@ Guillaume Auriol @@oth@@ Mario Kossmann @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
130863106 |
| dewey-sort |
3620 |
| id |
OLC1956554831 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1956554831</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217081447.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1956554831</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xinwei Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aircraft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specifications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hakki Eres</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Claude Baron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillaume Auriol</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mario Kossmann</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Inst., 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">229(2015), 11, Seite 2035</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130863106</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1030835-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023106425</subfield><subfield code="x">0954-4054</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:229</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.70</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">229</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="h">2035</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Xinwei Zhang |
| spellingShingle |
Xinwei Zhang ddc 620 bkl 52.70 misc Simulation misc Engineering misc Aircraft misc Specifications Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| authorStr |
Xinwei Zhang |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130863106 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0954-4054 |
| topic_title |
620 DNB 52.70 bkl Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications Simulation Engineering Aircraft Specifications |
| topic |
ddc 620 bkl 52.70 misc Simulation misc Engineering misc Aircraft misc Specifications |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 620 bkl 52.70 misc Simulation misc Engineering misc Aircraft misc Specifications |
| topic_browse |
ddc 620 bkl 52.70 misc Simulation misc Engineering misc Aircraft misc Specifications |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
h e he c b cb g a ga m k mk |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
130863106 |
| dewey-tens |
620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130863106 (DE-600)1030835-0 (DE-576)023106425 |
| title |
Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1956554831 (DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831 (PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0 (KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua |
| title_full |
Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| author_sort |
Xinwei Zhang |
| journal |
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B |
| journalStr |
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
2035 |
| author_browse |
Xinwei Zhang |
| container_volume |
229 |
| class |
620 DNB 52.70 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Xinwei Zhang |
| dewey-full |
620 |
| title_sort |
replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| title_auth |
Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| abstract |
Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. |
| abstractGer |
Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4046 |
| container_issue |
11 |
| title_short |
Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Hakki Eres Claude Baron Guillaume Auriol Mario Kossmann |
| author2Str |
Hakki Eres Claude Baron Guillaume Auriol Mario Kossmann |
| ppnlink |
130863106 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:01:27.919Z |
| _version_ |
1803593174661201920 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1956554831</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220217081447.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1956554831</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1956554831</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)p1008-ab6d4a7dbd8892d5e6132afafc4d4757ce81e86f9ef4cdfb03969ac255e108b0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0121118820150000229001102035replacingtargetsettingbyvaluemodelsinthehouseofqua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.70</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xinwei Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Replacing target setting by value models in the 'house of quality' for value-based requirements specifications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Setting targets for engineering characteristics is common practice in the 'house of quality' for establishing requirements specifications. However, if deployed arbitrarily, this practice is prone to errors and can often yield irrational results. Three potential methodological problems have been identified, regarding the setting of independent targets for each engineering characteristic, setting fixed targets and cascading down targets from the system level to the component level have been identified. In this article, targets are categorised as constraints and goals because of their different implications for value trade-offs. Then, a 'multi-attribute utility theory' based approach is proposed, in which a system value model is developed in order to replace the setting of targets for system engineering characteristics and component value models are further derived to replace the setting of targets for component engineering characteristics. These value models enhance the traditional approach to requirements specification so that value-based requirements specifications can be developed. A case study is deployed to demonstrate the applicability of the approach in the civilian aerospace context for the development of requirements for commercial aircraft. The benefits of the proposed approach are twofold: (1) value becomes an explicit construct and (2) value can be rationally modelled and simulated in the 'house of quality' in order to establish value-based requirements specifications. Furthermore, identified methodological problems in terms of setting engineering characteristic targets at any level are mitigated.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Simulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aircraft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Specifications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hakki Eres</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Claude Baron</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillaume Auriol</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mario Kossmann</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / B</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Inst., 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">229(2015), 11, Seite 2035</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130863106</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1030835-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)023106425</subfield><subfield code="x">0954-4054</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:229</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1749603390</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.70</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">229</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="h">2035</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397339 |