Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome

Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Dong, Nianbo [verfasserIn]

Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: American journal of evaluation - Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998, 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:36 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; pages:42-66

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1177/1098214014553261

Katalog-ID:	OLC195702531X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a2200265 4500
001	OLC195702531X
003	DE-627
005	20220215130351.0
007	tu
008	160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1177/1098214014553261 \|2 doi
028	5	2	\|a PQ20160617
035			\|a (DE-627)OLC195702531X
035			\|a (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X
035			\|a (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40
035			\|a (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 330 \|q ZDB
084			\|a 70.03 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Dong, Nianbo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen \|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Band \|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality.
650		4	\|a factorial experimental designs
650		4	\|a propensity score
650		4	\|a causal inference
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t American journal of evaluation \|d Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998 \|g 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 \|w (DE-627)246046562 \|w (DE-600)1433908-0 \|w (DE-576)285087576 \|x 1098-2140 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:36 \|g year:2015 \|g number:1 \|g pages:42-66
856	4	1	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261 \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_OLC
912			\|a SSG-OLC-SOW
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
936	b	k	\|a 70.03 \|q AVZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 36 \|j 2015 \|e 1 \|h 42-66

Indexfelder

author_variant	n d nd
matchkey_str	article:10982140:2015----::snpoestsoeehdtapoiaeatraeprmnadsgsonlzteeainh
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
bklnumber	70.03
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1177/1098214014553261 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC195702531X (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40 (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 ZDB 70.03 bkl Dong, Nianbo verfasserin aut Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality. factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference Enthalten in American journal of evaluation Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 (DE-627)246046562 (DE-600)1433908-0 (DE-576)285087576 1098-2140 nnns volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2005 70.03 AVZ AR 36 2015 1 42-66
spelling	10.1177/1098214014553261 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC195702531X (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40 (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 ZDB 70.03 bkl Dong, Nianbo verfasserin aut Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality. factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference Enthalten in American journal of evaluation Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 (DE-627)246046562 (DE-600)1433908-0 (DE-576)285087576 1098-2140 nnns volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2005 70.03 AVZ AR 36 2015 1 42-66
allfields_unstemmed	10.1177/1098214014553261 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC195702531X (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40 (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 ZDB 70.03 bkl Dong, Nianbo verfasserin aut Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality. factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference Enthalten in American journal of evaluation Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 (DE-627)246046562 (DE-600)1433908-0 (DE-576)285087576 1098-2140 nnns volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2005 70.03 AVZ AR 36 2015 1 42-66
allfieldsGer	10.1177/1098214014553261 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC195702531X (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40 (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 ZDB 70.03 bkl Dong, Nianbo verfasserin aut Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality. factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference Enthalten in American journal of evaluation Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 (DE-627)246046562 (DE-600)1433908-0 (DE-576)285087576 1098-2140 nnns volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2005 70.03 AVZ AR 36 2015 1 42-66
allfieldsSound	10.1177/1098214014553261 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC195702531X (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40 (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 ZDB 70.03 bkl Dong, Nianbo verfasserin aut Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality. factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference Enthalten in American journal of evaluation Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 (DE-627)246046562 (DE-600)1433908-0 (DE-576)285087576 1098-2140 nnns volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2005 70.03 AVZ AR 36 2015 1 42-66
language	English
source	Enthalten in American journal of evaluation 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66
sourceStr	Enthalten in American journal of evaluation 36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66 volume:36 year:2015 number:1 pages:42-66
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference
dewey-raw	330
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	American journal of evaluation
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Dong, Nianbo @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	246046562
dewey-sort	3330
id	OLC195702531X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC195702531X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215130351.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/1098214014553261</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC195702531X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.03</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Nianbo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">factorial experimental designs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">propensity score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">causal inference</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">American journal of evaluation</subfield><subfield code="d">Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)246046562</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1433908-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)285087576</subfield><subfield code="x">1098-2140</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:42-66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.03</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">42-66</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Dong, Nianbo
spellingShingle	Dong, Nianbo ddc 330 bkl 70.03 misc factorial experimental designs misc propensity score misc causal inference Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome
authorStr	Dong, Nianbo
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)246046562
format	Article
dewey-ones	330 - Economics
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	OLC
remote_str	false
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1098-2140
topic_title	330 ZDB 70.03 bkl Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome factorial experimental designs propensity score causal inference
topic	ddc 330 bkl 70.03 misc factorial experimental designs misc propensity score misc causal inference
topic_unstemmed	ddc 330 bkl 70.03 misc factorial experimental designs misc propensity score misc causal inference
topic_browse	ddc 330 bkl 70.03 misc factorial experimental designs misc propensity score misc causal inference
format_facet	Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	nc
hierarchy_parent_title	American journal of evaluation
hierarchy_parent_id	246046562
dewey-tens	330 - Economics
hierarchy_top_title	American journal of evaluation
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)246046562 (DE-600)1433908-0 (DE-576)285087576
title	Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome
ctrlnum	(DE-627)OLC195702531X (DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X (PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40 (KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale
title_full	Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome
author_sort	Dong, Nianbo
journal	American journal of evaluation
journalStr	American journal of evaluation
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	42
author_browse	Dong, Nianbo
container_volume	36
class	330 ZDB 70.03 bkl
format_se	Aufsätze
author-letter	Dong, Nianbo
doi_str_mv	10.1177/1098214014553261
dewey-full	330
title_sort	using propensity score methods to approximate factorial experimental designs to analyze the relationship between two variables and an outcome
title_auth	Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome
abstract	Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality.
abstractGer	Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality.
abstract_unstemmed	Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-SOW GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_2005
container_issue	1
title_short	Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261
remote_bool	false
ppnlink	246046562
mediatype_str_mv	n
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1177/1098214014553261
up_date	2024-07-03T22:52:52.058Z
_version_	1803600183487889409
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC195702531X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215130351.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\| 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1177/1098214014553261</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC195702531X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC195702531X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)c1603-7f4bfffcd7c9a3bb3d882ed4b66ec8d398fa679182f58ad73244d76dd572dab40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0137518020150000036000100042usingpropensityscoremethodstoapproximatefactoriale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">70.03</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Nianbo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Researchers have become increasingly interested in programs’ main and interaction effects of two variables (A and B, e.g., two treatment variables or one treatment variable and one moderator) on outcomes. A challenge for estimating main and interaction effects is to eliminate selection bias across A-by-B groups. I introduce Rubin’s causal model to approximate factorial experimental designs for studies with partial randomization and nonrandomization. I apply a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate several propensity score applications. The findings suggest the following two applications for reducing bias and mean square error of parameter estimates when analyzing the relationship of two variables and an outcome: (a) inverse of propensity score weighting based on one multinomial propensity score model and (b) subclassification based on two binary propensity score models. As a demonstration, I examine whether the effects of the Head Start program, compared to other center-based care, for improving children’s reading achievement vary by child care quality.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">factorial experimental designs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">propensity score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">causal inference</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">American journal of evaluation</subfield><subfield code="d">Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2015), 1, Seite 42-66</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)246046562</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1433908-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)285087576</subfield><subfield code="x">1098-2140</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:42-66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214014553261</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">70.03</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">42-66</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400075

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Using Propensity Score Methods to Approximate Factorial Experimental Designs to Analyze the Relationship Between Two Variables and an Outcome

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?