Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach
AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Eid, Mohamed S [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of management in engineering - New York, NY : Soc., 1985, 31(2015), 6 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:31 ; year:2015 ; number:6 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
OLC1957113286 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1957113286 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220216054202.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1957113286 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 600 |q ZDB |
084 | |a 56.00 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 85.06 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Eid, Mohamed S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers | ||
540 | |a © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers | ||
650 | 4 | |a Technical Papers | |
650 | 4 | |a Game theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Usage | |
700 | 1 | |a El-adaway, Islam H |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Coatney, Kalyn T |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of management in engineering |d New York, NY : Soc., 1985 |g 31(2015), 6 |w (DE-627)130411922 |w (DE-600)622799-5 |w (DE-576)015914895 |x 0742-597X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2015 |g number:6 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-TEC | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 56.00 |q AVZ |
936 | b | k | |a 85.06 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 31 |j 2015 |e 6 |
author_variant |
m s e ms mse |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:0742597X:2015----::vltoaytbetaeyopsdsseisrne |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
bklnumber |
56.00 85.06 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957113286 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Eid, Mohamed S verfasserin aut Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Game theory Usage El-adaway, Islam H oth Coatney, Kalyn T oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 31(2015), 6 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 31 2015 6 |
spelling |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957113286 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Eid, Mohamed S verfasserin aut Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Game theory Usage El-adaway, Islam H oth Coatney, Kalyn T oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 31(2015), 6 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 31 2015 6 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957113286 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Eid, Mohamed S verfasserin aut Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Game theory Usage El-adaway, Islam H oth Coatney, Kalyn T oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 31(2015), 6 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 31 2015 6 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957113286 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Eid, Mohamed S verfasserin aut Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Game theory Usage El-adaway, Islam H oth Coatney, Kalyn T oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 31(2015), 6 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 31 2015 6 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957113286 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Eid, Mohamed S verfasserin aut Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers © COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers Technical Papers Game theory Usage El-adaway, Islam H oth Coatney, Kalyn T oth Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering New York, NY : Soc., 1985 31(2015), 6 (DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 0742-597X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 56.00 AVZ 85.06 AVZ AR 31 2015 6 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering 31(2015), 6 volume:31 year:2015 number:6 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of management in engineering 31(2015), 6 volume:31 year:2015 number:6 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Technical Papers Game theory Usage |
dewey-raw |
600 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of management in engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Eid, Mohamed S @@aut@@ El-adaway, Islam H @@oth@@ Coatney, Kalyn T @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
130411922 |
dewey-sort |
3600 |
id |
OLC1957113286 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1957113286</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216054202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1957113286</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eid, Mohamed S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technical Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Game theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Usage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">El-adaway, Islam H</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coatney, Kalyn T</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of management in engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Soc., 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2015), 6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130411922</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)622799-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015914895</subfield><subfield code="x">0742-597X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Eid, Mohamed S |
spellingShingle |
Eid, Mohamed S ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Technical Papers misc Game theory misc Usage Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach |
authorStr |
Eid, Mohamed S |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)130411922 |
format |
Article |
dewey-ones |
600 - Technology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
OLC |
remote_str |
false |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0742-597X |
topic_title |
600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach Technical Papers Game theory Usage |
topic |
ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Technical Papers misc Game theory misc Usage |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Technical Papers misc Game theory misc Usage |
topic_browse |
ddc 600 bkl 56.00 bkl 85.06 misc Technical Papers misc Game theory misc Usage |
format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
author2_variant |
i h e a ihe ihea k t c kt ktc |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of management in engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
130411922 |
dewey-tens |
600 - Technology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of management in engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)130411922 (DE-600)622799-5 (DE-576)015914895 |
title |
Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1957113286 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286 (PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0 (KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance |
title_full |
Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach |
author_sort |
Eid, Mohamed S |
journal |
Journal of management in engineering |
journalStr |
Journal of management in engineering |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Eid, Mohamed S |
container_volume |
31 |
class |
600 ZDB 56.00 bkl 85.06 bkl |
format_se |
Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Eid, Mohamed S |
doi_str_mv |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 |
dewey-full |
600 |
title_sort |
evolutionary stable strategy for postdisaster insurance: game theory approach |
title_auth |
Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach |
abstract |
AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. |
abstractGer |
AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. |
abstract_unstemmed |
AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-TEC GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 |
remote_bool |
false |
author2 |
El-adaway, Islam H Coatney, Kalyn T |
author2Str |
El-adaway, Islam H Coatney, Kalyn T |
ppnlink |
130411922 |
mediatype_str_mv |
n |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T23:13:46.638Z |
_version_ |
1803601499081670656 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1957113286</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220216054202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1957113286</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1957113286</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)a1817-e16b9f6e2736860cb06bd07e27cca785270e6ef05034607d1b47487621147cfe0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0138950520150000031000600000evolutionarystablestrategyforpostdisasterinsurance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eid, Mohamed S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolutionary Stable Strategy for Postdisaster Insurance: Game Theory Approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AbstractMitigation of the financial impacts associated with natural disasters is becoming an urgent objective at both the national and international levels, as the rate and magnitude of natural disasters are continuing to increase. Using an evolutionary game theory approach, this paper aims to find an equilibrium profile of postdisaster insurance plans purchased by resident families and sold by insurance companies, as well as ex-postdisaster relief implemented by a government agency. This dynamic integrated assessment minimizes the total losses for the three aforementioned associated stakeholders, thus maximizing welfare within natural disaster host community systems. To this end, the authors determined a plausible set of actions and utility functions for the associated stakeholders. Also, they created a hypothetical sample of 1,000 resident families accounting for heterogeneous income levels, three insurance companies offering three unique insurance plans per company—each with different premium and coverage—and two different types of government compensation plans for postdisaster damage mitigation. The proposed model was implemented on the NetBeans IDE 7.4 platform using the Java programming language for a hypothetical case study. The results indicate that (1) resident families tend to prefer insurance plans with the lowest premium value and coverage; (2) insurance plans with the most comprehensive coverage experienced the least demand; and (3) the evolutionary stable strategy is an oscillating line of chosen plans and insurers as a result of the stochastic and dynamics nature of the factors associated with disaster management. Currently, the authors are working to develop the model further to better account for simultaneous actions by all stakeholders (not only resident families), population growth, changes in financial and income standards, integrating input from available natural hazard prediction software systems (e.g., HAZUS-MH), and continuous data. Ultimately, this evolutionary game theory model will be tested on post–Hurricane Katrina data representing real-life physical damage in Hancock County, Mississippi.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© COPYRIGHT 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technical Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Game theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Usage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">El-adaway, Islam H</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Coatney, Kalyn T</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of management in engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Soc., 1985</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2015), 6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)130411922</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)622799-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)015914895</subfield><subfield code="x">0742-597X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-TEC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.06</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401454 |