A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties
The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasona...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jorge L Contreras [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Berkeley technology law journal - Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996, 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:30 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:1451 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1957717041 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1957717041 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215083616.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1957717041 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 340 |q ZDB |
| 084 | |a 86.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Jorge L Contreras |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Remedies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patent infringement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Royalties | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Models | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patent law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infringement | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Richard J Gilbert |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Berkeley technology law journal |d Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996 |g 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 |w (DE-627)214112748 |w (DE-600)1330427-6 |w (DE-576)053642643 |x 1086-3818 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:1451 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-JUR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 86.00 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 30 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 1451 | ||
| author_variant |
j l c jlc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10863818:2015----::uiidrmwrfradnohres |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
86.00 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957717041 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Jorge L Contreras verfasserin aut A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement Richard J Gilbert oth Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 (DE-627)214112748 (DE-600)1330427-6 (DE-576)053642643 1086-3818 nnns volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2014 86.00 AVZ AR 30 2015 2 1451 |
| spelling |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957717041 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Jorge L Contreras verfasserin aut A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement Richard J Gilbert oth Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 (DE-627)214112748 (DE-600)1330427-6 (DE-576)053642643 1086-3818 nnns volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2014 86.00 AVZ AR 30 2015 2 1451 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957717041 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Jorge L Contreras verfasserin aut A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement Richard J Gilbert oth Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 (DE-627)214112748 (DE-600)1330427-6 (DE-576)053642643 1086-3818 nnns volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2014 86.00 AVZ AR 30 2015 2 1451 |
| allfieldsGer |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957717041 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Jorge L Contreras verfasserin aut A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement Richard J Gilbert oth Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 (DE-627)214112748 (DE-600)1330427-6 (DE-576)053642643 1086-3818 nnns volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2014 86.00 AVZ AR 30 2015 2 1451 |
| allfieldsSound |
PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1957717041 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 340 ZDB 86.00 bkl Jorge L Contreras verfasserin aut A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement Richard J Gilbert oth Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 (DE-627)214112748 (DE-600)1330427-6 (DE-576)053642643 1086-3818 nnns volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2014 86.00 AVZ AR 30 2015 2 1451 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Berkeley technology law journal 30(2015), 2, Seite 1451 volume:30 year:2015 number:2 pages:1451 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement |
| dewey-raw |
340 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Berkeley technology law journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jorge L Contreras @@aut@@ Richard J Gilbert @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
214112748 |
| dewey-sort |
3340 |
| id |
OLC1957717041 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1957717041</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215083616.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1957717041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jorge L Contreras</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Remedies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patent infringement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Royalties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patent law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infringement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richard J Gilbert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Berkeley technology law journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2015), 2, Seite 1451</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)214112748</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1330427-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)053642643</subfield><subfield code="x">1086-3818</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1451</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">1451</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Jorge L Contreras |
| spellingShingle |
Jorge L Contreras ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Remedies misc Patent infringement misc Royalties misc Models misc Patent law misc Infringement A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties |
| authorStr |
Jorge L Contreras |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)214112748 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
340 - Law |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1086-3818 |
| topic_title |
340 ZDB 86.00 bkl A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties Remedies Patent infringement Royalties Models Patent law Infringement |
| topic |
ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Remedies misc Patent infringement misc Royalties misc Models misc Patent law misc Infringement |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Remedies misc Patent infringement misc Royalties misc Models misc Patent law misc Infringement |
| topic_browse |
ddc 340 bkl 86.00 misc Remedies misc Patent infringement misc Royalties misc Models misc Patent law misc Infringement |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
r j g rjg |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Berkeley technology law journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
214112748 |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Berkeley technology law journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)214112748 (DE-600)1330427-6 (DE-576)053642643 |
| title |
A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1957717041 (DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041 (PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0 (KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties |
| title_full |
A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties |
| author_sort |
Jorge L Contreras |
| journal |
Berkeley technology law journal |
| journalStr |
Berkeley technology law journal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1451 |
| author_browse |
Jorge L Contreras |
| container_volume |
30 |
| class |
340 ZDB 86.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jorge L Contreras |
| dewey-full |
340 |
| title_sort |
unified framework for rand and other reasonable royalties |
| title_auth |
A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties |
| abstract |
The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. |
| abstractGer |
The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-JUR GBV_ILN_2014 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties |
| url |
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Richard J Gilbert |
| author2Str |
Richard J Gilbert |
| ppnlink |
214112748 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:09:23.459Z |
| _version_ |
1803608772795432960 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1957717041</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215083616.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1957717041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1957717041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)g815-4ba12df4f402b4aba470dd4f5b9a0b8768dd675de170c7f96d12aab5600201ea0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0160456220150000030000201451unifiedframeworkforrandandotherreasonableroyalties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jorge L Contreras</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A unified framework for RAND and other reasonable royalties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The framework for calculating "reasonable royalty" patent damages has evolved over the years to a point at which, today, it is viewed by many commentators as potentially misleading and untethered from its original purpose. We offer a proposal to modify the framework for determining reasonable patent royalties that is based on recent scholarly and judicial analyses of standard-essential patents that are subject to commitments to license on terms that are reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND). Litigated cases have applied the traditional Georgia-Pacific factors to assess RAND royalty rates with modifications to account for the circumstances of the RAND commitment and the incremental value of allegedly infringed patents to the overall product offering. We propose that the reasonable royalty analysis should be conducted in essentially the same manner for all patents, whether or not they are encumbered by RAND commitments. We find considerable support for our approach in the historical development of U.S. patent law prior to the advent of the Georgia-Pacific test.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Remedies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patent infringement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Royalties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patent law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infringement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Richard J Gilbert</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Berkeley technology law journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Berkeley, Calif. : School, 1996</subfield><subfield code="g">30(2015), 2, Seite 1451</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)214112748</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1330427-6</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)053642643</subfield><subfield code="x">1086-3818</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:30</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1451</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756069115</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-JUR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">86.00</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">30</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">1451</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399288 |