The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research
Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication w...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: OCLC systems & services - Bingley : Emerald, 1993, 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:31 ; year:2015 ; number:4 ; pages:163-195 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1958425826 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1958425826 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230714144733.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1958425826 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |a 020 |q DNB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Marsh, Rebecca Mary |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Library & information science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Library technology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Librarianship/library management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Communications networks | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Software | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Archives & records | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Digital transmission | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Object repository | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t OCLC systems & services |d Bingley : Emerald, 1993 |g 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 |w (DE-627)131208373 |w (DE-600)1154667-0 |w (DE-576)467751587 |x 1065-075X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:163-195 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-MAT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-BUB | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-BBI | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 31 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 163-195 | ||
| author_variant |
r m m rm rmm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1065075X:2015----::hrloisiuinleoioisneeoighcmuiai |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1958425826 (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 020 DNB Marsh, Rebecca Mary verfasserin aut The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository Enthalten in OCLC systems & services Bingley : Emerald, 1993 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 (DE-627)131208373 (DE-600)1154667-0 (DE-576)467751587 1065-075X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI AR 31 2015 4 163-195 |
| spelling |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1958425826 (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 020 DNB Marsh, Rebecca Mary verfasserin aut The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository Enthalten in OCLC systems & services Bingley : Emerald, 1993 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 (DE-627)131208373 (DE-600)1154667-0 (DE-576)467751587 1065-075X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI AR 31 2015 4 163-195 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1958425826 (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 020 DNB Marsh, Rebecca Mary verfasserin aut The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository Enthalten in OCLC systems & services Bingley : Emerald, 1993 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 (DE-627)131208373 (DE-600)1154667-0 (DE-576)467751587 1065-075X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI AR 31 2015 4 163-195 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1958425826 (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 020 DNB Marsh, Rebecca Mary verfasserin aut The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository Enthalten in OCLC systems & services Bingley : Emerald, 1993 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 (DE-627)131208373 (DE-600)1154667-0 (DE-576)467751587 1065-075X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI AR 31 2015 4 163-195 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1958425826 (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 004 020 DNB Marsh, Rebecca Mary verfasserin aut The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository Enthalten in OCLC systems & services Bingley : Emerald, 1993 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 (DE-627)131208373 (DE-600)1154667-0 (DE-576)467751587 1065-075X nnns volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI AR 31 2015 4 163-195 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in OCLC systems & services 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in OCLC systems & services 31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195 volume:31 year:2015 number:4 pages:163-195 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository |
| dewey-raw |
004 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
OCLC systems & services |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
131208373 |
| dewey-sort |
14 |
| id |
OLC1958425826 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1958425826</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714144733.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1958425826</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">020</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marsh, Rebecca Mary</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library & information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Librarianship/library management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communications networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Archives & records</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Digital transmission</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Object repository</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">OCLC systems & services</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131208373</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1154667-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)467751587</subfield><subfield code="x">1065-075X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:163-195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">163-195</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary |
| spellingShingle |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary ddc 004 misc Library & information science misc Library technology misc Librarianship/library management misc Communications networks misc Software misc Archives & records misc Digital transmission misc Object repository The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| authorStr |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)131208373 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science 020 - Library & information sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1065-075X |
| topic_title |
004 020 DNB The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research Library & information science Library technology Librarianship/library management Communications networks Software Archives & records Digital transmission Object repository |
| topic |
ddc 004 misc Library & information science misc Library technology misc Librarianship/library management misc Communications networks misc Software misc Archives & records misc Digital transmission misc Object repository |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 misc Library & information science misc Library technology misc Librarianship/library management misc Communications networks misc Software misc Archives & records misc Digital transmission misc Object repository |
| topic_browse |
ddc 004 misc Library & information science misc Library technology misc Librarianship/library management misc Communications networks misc Software misc Archives & records misc Digital transmission misc Object repository |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
OCLC systems & services |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
131208373 |
| dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems 020 - Library & information sciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
OCLC systems & services |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)131208373 (DE-600)1154667-0 (DE-576)467751587 |
| title |
The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1958425826 (DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826 (PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40 (KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm |
| title_full |
The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| author_sort |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary |
| journal |
OCLC systems & services |
| journalStr |
OCLC systems & services |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
163 |
| author_browse |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary |
| container_volume |
31 |
| class |
004 020 DNB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Marsh, Rebecca Mary |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 |
| dewey-full |
004 020 |
| title_sort |
role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| title_auth |
The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| abstract |
Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. |
| abstractGer |
Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-MAT SSG-OLC-BUB SSG-OPC-BBI |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
131208373 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:49:11.719Z |
| _version_ |
1803615051949539329 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1958425826</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230714144733.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1958425826</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1958425826</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)e1747-eddc71ef44ec1e6033b9670d73cfd2575f0cad1d67a9905c19aa4b7013ac60e40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0184708220150000031000400163roleofinstitutionalrepositoriesindevelopingthecomm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="a">020</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marsh, Rebecca Mary</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose – This paper aims to uncover the central purposes of institutional repositories, how developments are being affected by policies and researcher behaviour and also what services and approaches are appropriate in supporting repositories from those partners involved in scholarly communication with a particular focus on services that support the publication of research. Design/methodology/approach – The research reviews the literature and current practices within higher education with regard to the core purposes of institutional repositories, the possible causes of low population of repositories in some institutions and subject disciplines, how this is being addressed and likely future developments. A qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews explores current best practices and tests the specific research questions that emerged from the literature review. Findings – The rate at which institutional repositories have grown in number has been very fast in recent years, but the population of repositories with research has been relatively slow. The research identified a number of reasons as to why the population of repositories was likely to accelerate in the future and have a more significant impact on scholarly communication. The main catalysts are: strengthening of national and funder policies that serve to both mandate open access (green or gold) and raise awareness of open access amongst faculty; the alignment of repositories with current research information systems within universities; and the development of metadata and open archives initiative harvesting that will improve discoverability and usage data. Research limitations/implications – As many of the issues around the development of repositories centre on the attitudes of faculty, it would also provide an interesting extension to the research to understand their views of the role of institutional repositories, too. Practical implications – The study presents a number of possible new ways of working by both information professionals and publishers to improve scholarly communication through the inclusion of research within institutional repositories and how perceived barriers could be overcome. Social implications – The study provides guidance on how the communication of scholarly research could be improved and reach a wider audience. This, in turn, will benefit researchers, corporate organisations and the public at large. Originality/value – The paper provides a review of current best practices in managing institutional repositories and identifies new ways of addressing some of the perceived barriers to populating repositories and the benefits for each stakeholder in the scholarly communication process.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library & information science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Library technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Librarianship/library management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communications networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Software</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Archives & records</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Digital transmission</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Object repository</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">OCLC systems & services</subfield><subfield code="d">Bingley : Emerald, 1993</subfield><subfield code="g">31(2015), 4, Seite 163-195</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)131208373</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1154667-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)467751587</subfield><subfield code="x">1065-075X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:163-195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1732339374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-BUB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">163-195</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401354 |