Sophie's Choice
This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference form...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: European societies - London : Routledge, 1999, 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2015 ; number:3 ; pages:351 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1960828355 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1960828355 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215025645.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1960828355 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q ZDB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Carreira da Silva, Filipe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sophie's Choice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Portugal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dualization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a welfare regimes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a welfare attitudes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social rights consciousness | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Valadez Martinez, Laura |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European societies |d London : Routledge, 1999 |g 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 |w (DE-627)265511305 |w (DE-600)1464522-1 |w (DE-576)090954157 |x 1461-6696 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:351 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-SOW | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-BBI | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_49 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2351 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4311 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 17 |j 2015 |e 3 |h 351 | ||
| author_variant |
d s f c dsf dsfc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14616696:2015----::ohec |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1960828355 (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ZDB Carreira da Silva, Filipe verfasserin aut Sophie's Choice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness Valadez Martinez, Laura oth Enthalten in European societies London : Routledge, 1999 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 (DE-627)265511305 (DE-600)1464522-1 (DE-576)090954157 1461-6696 nnns volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2351 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 17 2015 3 351 |
| spelling |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1960828355 (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ZDB Carreira da Silva, Filipe verfasserin aut Sophie's Choice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness Valadez Martinez, Laura oth Enthalten in European societies London : Routledge, 1999 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 (DE-627)265511305 (DE-600)1464522-1 (DE-576)090954157 1461-6696 nnns volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2351 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 17 2015 3 351 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1960828355 (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ZDB Carreira da Silva, Filipe verfasserin aut Sophie's Choice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness Valadez Martinez, Laura oth Enthalten in European societies London : Routledge, 1999 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 (DE-627)265511305 (DE-600)1464522-1 (DE-576)090954157 1461-6696 nnns volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2351 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 17 2015 3 351 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1960828355 (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ZDB Carreira da Silva, Filipe verfasserin aut Sophie's Choice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness Valadez Martinez, Laura oth Enthalten in European societies London : Routledge, 1999 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 (DE-627)265511305 (DE-600)1464522-1 (DE-576)090954157 1461-6696 nnns volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2351 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 17 2015 3 351 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1960828355 (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ZDB Carreira da Silva, Filipe verfasserin aut Sophie's Choice 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness Valadez Martinez, Laura oth Enthalten in European societies London : Routledge, 1999 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 (DE-627)265511305 (DE-600)1464522-1 (DE-576)090954157 1461-6696 nnns volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2351 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 AR 17 2015 3 351 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in European societies 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in European societies 17(2015), 3, Seite 351 volume:17 year:2015 number:3 pages:351 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
European societies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe @@aut@@ Valadez Martinez, Laura @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
265511305 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
OLC1960828355 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1960828355</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215025645.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1960828355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carreira da Silva, Filipe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sophie's Choice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Portugal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dualization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">welfare regimes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">welfare attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social rights consciousness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valadez Martinez, Laura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European societies</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Routledge, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2015), 3, Seite 351</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)265511305</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1464522-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090954157</subfield><subfield code="x">1461-6696</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">351</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe |
| spellingShingle |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe ddc 300 misc Portugal misc dualization misc welfare regimes misc social rights misc welfare attitudes misc social rights consciousness Sophie's Choice |
| authorStr |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)265511305 |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1461-6696 |
| topic_title |
300 ZDB Sophie's Choice Portugal dualization welfare regimes social rights welfare attitudes social rights consciousness |
| topic |
ddc 300 misc Portugal misc dualization misc welfare regimes misc social rights misc welfare attitudes misc social rights consciousness |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 misc Portugal misc dualization misc welfare regimes misc social rights misc welfare attitudes misc social rights consciousness |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 misc Portugal misc dualization misc welfare regimes misc social rights misc welfare attitudes misc social rights consciousness |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| author2_variant |
m l v ml mlv |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
European societies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
265511305 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
European societies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)265511305 (DE-600)1464522-1 (DE-576)090954157 |
| title |
Sophie's Choice |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1960828355 (DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355 (PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810 (KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice |
| title_full |
Sophie's Choice |
| author_sort |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe |
| journal |
European societies |
| journalStr |
European societies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
351 |
| author_browse |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe |
| container_volume |
17 |
| class |
300 ZDB |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Carreira da Silva, Filipe |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |
| dewey-full |
300 |
| title_sort |
sophie's choice |
| title_auth |
Sophie's Choice |
| abstract |
This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. |
| abstractGer |
This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-SOW SSG-OPC-BBI GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_49 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_2012 GBV_ILN_2351 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4311 |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Sophie's Choice |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| author2 |
Valadez Martinez, Laura |
| author2Str |
Valadez Martinez, Laura |
| ppnlink |
265511305 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:43:01.084Z |
| _version_ |
1803599563808833536 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1960828355</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215025645.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1960828355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1960828355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1215-e6e83fae4cc2bca51511b25a20542740db363dabc1d2908d925b54771e74af810</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0385930420150000017000300351sophieschoice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Carreira da Silva, Filipe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sophie's Choice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article examines social attitudes towards social rights in Portugal. It utilizes original survey data from 2013 to study the distribution of welfare attitudes in a context of economic austerity and welfare retrenchment. The main argument is that there are at least two sources of preference formation regarding public social provision: one is universalistic (or needs-based), and the other is contributory. These two logics frame choices concerning the future of the welfare state in Portugal. We explore the determinants of this choice through three hypotheses: dualization between insiders and outsiders (H1), the type of welfare regime (H2) and social rights consciousness (H3). Our findings suggest that choice between universalistic and contributory models is not impervious to macro-institutional factors and labour market performance. The paper's main contribution, however, is to empirically demonstrate that this choice is significantly shaped by pre-existing understandings of social rights in Portugal, namely its politically contested character.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Portugal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dualization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">welfare regimes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">welfare attitudes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social rights consciousness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valadez Martinez, Laura</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European societies</subfield><subfield code="d">London : Routledge, 1999</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2015), 3, Seite 351</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)265511305</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1464522-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090954157</subfield><subfield code="x">1461-6696</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616696.2015.1035299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-SOW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-BBI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_49</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">351</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4016542 |