Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control
In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Morgan, Matthew [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Rechteinformationen: |
Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Defence studies - Abingdon : Routledge, 2001, 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:15 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; pages:1 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
OLC1961037769 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1961037769 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220214205348.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1961037769 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 320 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 89.83 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Morgan, Matthew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a risk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a alliance politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a command and control | |
| 650 | 4 | |a NATO | |
| 650 | 4 | |a defense strategy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a modeling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Foreign policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geopolitics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Knowledge | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cold War | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Defence studies |d Abingdon : Routledge, 2001 |g 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 |w (DE-627)32730684X |w (DE-600)2043035-8 |w (DE-576)9327306848 |x 1470-2436 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:1 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-POL | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-IBL | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 89.83 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 15 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 1 | ||
| author_variant |
m m mm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14702436:2015----::taeynlxaoaotoorsmngmnadheaoainfnwr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| bklnumber |
89.83 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1961037769 (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.83 bkl Morgan, Matthew verfasserin aut Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War Enthalten in Defence studies Abingdon : Routledge, 2001 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 (DE-627)32730684X (DE-600)2043035-8 (DE-576)9327306848 1470-2436 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_4012 89.83 AVZ AR 15 2015 1 1 |
| spelling |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1961037769 (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.83 bkl Morgan, Matthew verfasserin aut Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War Enthalten in Defence studies Abingdon : Routledge, 2001 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 (DE-627)32730684X (DE-600)2043035-8 (DE-576)9327306848 1470-2436 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_4012 89.83 AVZ AR 15 2015 1 1 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1961037769 (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.83 bkl Morgan, Matthew verfasserin aut Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War Enthalten in Defence studies Abingdon : Routledge, 2001 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 (DE-627)32730684X (DE-600)2043035-8 (DE-576)9327306848 1470-2436 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_4012 89.83 AVZ AR 15 2015 1 1 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1961037769 (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.83 bkl Morgan, Matthew verfasserin aut Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War Enthalten in Defence studies Abingdon : Routledge, 2001 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 (DE-627)32730684X (DE-600)2043035-8 (DE-576)9327306848 1470-2436 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_4012 89.83 AVZ AR 15 2015 1 1 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 doi PQ20160617 (DE-627)OLC1961037769 (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 320 DNB 89.83 bkl Morgan, Matthew verfasserin aut Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control 2015 Text txt rdacontent ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen n rdamedia Band nc rdacarrier In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015 risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War Enthalten in Defence studies Abingdon : Routledge, 2001 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 (DE-627)32730684X (DE-600)2043035-8 (DE-576)9327306848 1470-2436 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 Volltext http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_4012 89.83 AVZ AR 15 2015 1 1 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Defence studies 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Defence studies 15(2015), 1, Seite 1 volume:15 year:2015 number:1 pages:1 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War |
| dewey-raw |
320 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Defence studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Morgan, Matthew @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
32730684X |
| dewey-sort |
3320 |
| id |
OLC1961037769 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1961037769</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214205348.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/14702436.2014.999475</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1961037769</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.83</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morgan, Matthew</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">risk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alliance politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">command and control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">defense strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Foreign policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geopolitics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cold War</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Defence studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon : Routledge, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2015), 1, Seite 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32730684X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2043035-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9327306848</subfield><subfield code="x">1470-2436</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.83</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Morgan, Matthew |
| spellingShingle |
Morgan, Matthew ddc 320 bkl 89.83 misc risk misc alliance politics misc command and control misc NATO misc defense strategy misc modeling misc Foreign policy misc Risk management misc Geopolitics misc Knowledge misc Cold War Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| authorStr |
Morgan, Matthew |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)32730684X |
| format |
Article |
| dewey-ones |
320 - Political science |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
OLC |
| remote_str |
false |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1470-2436 |
| topic_title |
320 DNB 89.83 bkl Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control risk alliance politics command and control NATO defense strategy modeling Foreign policy Risk management Geopolitics Knowledge Cold War |
| topic |
ddc 320 bkl 89.83 misc risk misc alliance politics misc command and control misc NATO misc defense strategy misc modeling misc Foreign policy misc Risk management misc Geopolitics misc Knowledge misc Cold War |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 320 bkl 89.83 misc risk misc alliance politics misc command and control misc NATO misc defense strategy misc modeling misc Foreign policy misc Risk management misc Geopolitics misc Knowledge misc Cold War |
| topic_browse |
ddc 320 bkl 89.83 misc risk misc alliance politics misc command and control misc NATO misc defense strategy misc modeling misc Foreign policy misc Risk management misc Geopolitics misc Knowledge misc Cold War |
| format_facet |
Aufsätze Gedruckte Aufsätze |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
nc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Defence studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
32730684X |
| dewey-tens |
320 - Political science |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Defence studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)32730684X (DE-600)2043035-8 (DE-576)9327306848 |
| title |
Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)OLC1961037769 (DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769 (PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0 (KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee |
| title_full |
Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| author_sort |
Morgan, Matthew |
| journal |
Defence studies |
| journalStr |
Defence studies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Morgan, Matthew |
| container_volume |
15 |
| class |
320 DNB 89.83 bkl |
| format_se |
Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Morgan, Matthew |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 |
| dewey-full |
320 |
| title_sort |
strategy in flux: nato's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| title_auth |
Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| abstract |
In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. |
| abstractGer |
In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_OLC SSG-OLC-POL SSG-OLC-IBL GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_4012 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521 |
| remote_bool |
false |
| ppnlink |
32730684X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
n |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1080/14702436.2014.999475 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T23:38:03.879Z |
| _version_ |
1803603027039354880 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a2200265 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">OLC1961037769</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220214205348.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">tu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/14702436.2014.999475</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">PQ20160617</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)OLC1961037769</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVOLC1961037769</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PRQ)i1351-ef269be7588d9c5c6adfa0ba51bbb107bcefb0070ae5f66d5b71d72233e3fe5d0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(KEY)0439264720150000015000100001strategyinfluxnatosadoptionofriskmanagementandthee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">320</subfield><subfield code="q">DNB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">89.83</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morgan, Matthew</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strategy in flux: NATO's adoption of risk management and the elaboration of a new framework of command and control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen</subfield><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Band</subfield><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In response to the uncertain geopolitical environment which confronted it after the end of the Cold War, NATO adopted a strategy of risk management. Two institutions - the Science and Technology Office and Allied Command Transformation - were responsible for translating this policy into practice. By promoting knowledge development, each institution sought to make NATO a more reflexive and responsive organization. Knowledge development became the foundation for a new model of command and control created by two Science and Technology Office working groups. While this model has vast potential, its implementation has been blocked by internal rifts within NATO.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nutzungsrecht: © 2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">risk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alliance politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">command and control</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">defense strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">modeling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Foreign policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geopolitics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Knowledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cold War</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Defence studies</subfield><subfield code="d">Abingdon : Routledge, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2015), 1, Seite 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32730684X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2043035-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)9327306848</subfield><subfield code="x">1470-2436</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14702436.2014.999475</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">http://search.proquest.com/docview/1673122521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_OLC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-POL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-IBL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">89.83</subfield><subfield code="q">AVZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4001493 |